Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Flyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs) →Feminism article: You have chosen the wrong person to believe you. |
||
| Line 839: | Line 839: | ||
::And [[WP:CITELEAD]] states: Because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material. Leads are usually written at a greater level of generality than the body, and information in the lead section of non-controversial subjects is less likely to be challenged and less likely to require a source; there is not, however, an exception to citation requirements specific to leads. The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many citations; others, few or none. The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 20:03, 10 February 2015 (UTC) |
::And [[WP:CITELEAD]] states: Because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material. Leads are usually written at a greater level of generality than the body, and information in the lead section of non-controversial subjects is less likely to be challenged and less likely to require a source; there is not, however, an exception to citation requirements specific to leads. The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many citations; others, few or none. The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 20:03, 10 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
:::You are more than welcome to have an administrator check my account. They will see that I have nothing to do with the other account referenced. As far as your other remarks, those should really be on the Feminism talk page, where discussion regarding edits to that article takes place. [[User:BrentNewland|BrentNewland]] ([[User talk:BrentNewland|talk]]) 20:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC) |
:::You are more than welcome to have an administrator check my account. They will see that I have nothing to do with the other account referenced. As far as your other remarks, those should really be on the Feminism talk page, where discussion regarding edits to that article takes place. [[User:BrentNewland|BrentNewland]] ([[User talk:BrentNewland|talk]]) 20:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
:::::{{User|BrentNewland}}, if you expect me to believe that you, a relatively dormant Wikipedia account that started editing Wikipedia again today only after the relatively dormant Spudst3r account started editing Wikipedia again a day ago, are unrelated to that account when both accounts edit the [[men's rights]] aspect in essentially the same way (including by their focus on [[WP:Words to watch]]), you have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Flyer22&diff=644147408&oldid=644147286#WP:Sockpuppet_watch chosen the wrong person to believe you.] But carry on as usual, I suppose. The truth usually comes out on matters such as these, especially in the obvious cases. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 21:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Editing Mercedes W204 == |
== Editing Mercedes W204 == |
||