Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Carolina2k22 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Strawberry Shortcake: Berry in the Big City and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 04:16, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 04:16, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how I'm being ridiculous? Can you explain. Toongirl1985 (talk) 18:27, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not on mine! The article’s talk page. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 18:31, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok have added there -- please respond. Toongirl1985 (talk) 18:36, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Old Guard (franchise), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 04:40, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Template:DreamWorks Animation, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Like I've said previously several times, navboxes are for existing articles. Create articles first, then add them. Navboxes are not intended to list everything associated with a subject, but to ease navigation. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, whoa hold on… i only got rid of Meet the Gillmans, not mess it up BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 07:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"they stay, no changing. Navboxes are fine like this. You shouldn’t judge them by their looks", pardon? You again did the following:

• ** [[Shrek (franchise)#Spin-off|''Puss in Boots'']] As far as Wikipedia is concerned, Puss In Boots is part of the larger Shrek franchise
• Same goes for Dog Man, there is nothing about a film adaption in that article
• Megamind: The Button of Doom, Panda Paws, Marooned, To: Gerald, Precious Templeton: A Pony Tale and The Bad Guys in Maraschino Ruby do not have articles. WP:NAV is for WP:EXISTING articles.

So I'm going to ask you again to create the articles first, before unnecessarily adding these into the navbox. And please undo your own revert. You are being disruptive at this point and not following clearly established guidelines. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:44, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looking back at your talk page, in the less than two years you've been here you had a history of edit warring, and you've been issued several warnings. I do not want to see you blocked. I do think you want to help. So please, just follow consensus. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 08:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I get those because they don’t understand me or what i’m trying to fix. If you check my profile, i have autism. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 08:27, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, but you can't use your autism as an excuse not to follow guidelines or go against consensus. Like French philosopher Sartre said, hell is other people, but here you have to work with other editors. Could you undo your revert, please? I've pointed to relevant guidelines why the navbox shouldn't stay that way. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 10:54, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BMA-Nation2020, it's been over 24 hours since my last message. I see you've been actively editing, but you haven't replied or undid your revert. I've pointed you to the relevant guideline. Please be so kind to do so. I'd be happy to do it if you don't feel like it. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 11:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wanna be left alone. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 17:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can get fed up about it, as I've said again and again, our guidelines clearly state that naboxes are for existing articles. Are you sure you want go that way, BMA-Nation2020? Please undo your revert. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 18:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no undoing. I'm tried of this. I leave it where it was and that's final. Stop bothering me and please let me do my own thing. Dog Man and Puss in Boots have both franchises. and i moved the short films list to the related ones. So it won't be a bothersome for you to revert it. the template for Skydance is fine but DreamWorks isn't. Don't talk to me like this again and again and do not discuss me over the templates i edit. Cause i swear if there's a loophole to the guidelines, i'll prove that not every template need your WP:EXISTING thing or WP:NAV. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 18:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]