Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
151.40.23.226 (talk)
151.40.23.226 (talk)
Line 8: Line 8:
:I read the HCSS 2014 report, and I only saw it mentioned the USA, EU, China and Russia as great powers. Maybe I missed the part where it called Italy a great power, could you tell me what page number it is on? Thanks. [[User:Antiochus the Great|Antiochus the Great]] ([[User talk:Antiochus the Great#top|talk]]) 09:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
:I read the HCSS 2014 report, and I only saw it mentioned the USA, EU, China and Russia as great powers. Maybe I missed the part where it called Italy a great power, could you tell me what page number it is on? Thanks. [[User:Antiochus the Great|Antiochus the Great]] ([[User talk:Antiochus the Great#top|talk]]) 09:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


It was post in overlaps of Middle power article.It has been removed.You are a very good english writer.Theoretically it's difficult to distinguish great powers at the described levels.Just Canada is border line for demography and military.Germany and Japan are better than France, UK and Italy for economy and demography but not for military or cultural power.Russia lacks totally for economy and partially as cultural power.China lacks for level of life and same India that is much worse in economy (above all in net national wealth that is more important than nominal GDP).USA are the perfect great power. [[Special:Contributions/151.40.23.226|151.40.23.226]] ([[User talk:151.40.23.226|talk]]) 09:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[[Special:Contributions/151.40.23.226|151.40.23.226]] ([[User talk:151.40.23.226|talk]]) 09:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
It was post in overlaps of Middle power article.It has been removed.You are a very good english writer.Theoretically it's difficult to distinguish great powers at the described levels.Just Canada is border line for demography and military.Germany and Japan are better than France, UK and Italy for economy and demography but not for military or cultural power.Russia lacks totally for economy and partially as cultural power.China lacks for level of life and same India that is much worse in economy (above all in net national wealth that is more important than nominal GDP).USA are the perfect great power as single country. [[Special:Contributions/151.40.23.226|151.40.23.226]] ([[User talk:151.40.23.226|talk]]) 09:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[[Special:Contributions/151.40.23.226|151.40.23.226]] ([[User talk:151.40.23.226|talk]]) 09:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:45, 14 June 2016

Great power

Greetings,good article.HCSS 2014 report describes Italy as a great power (it's a very important source and very recent).It's difficult today describe a perfetc great power except for the USA.Italy (and India may be even it's global position it's weaker) can be added in the flags of today great powers.Greetings again)151.40.23.226 (talk) 08:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I read the HCSS 2014 report, and I only saw it mentioned the USA, EU, China and Russia as great powers. Maybe I missed the part where it called Italy a great power, could you tell me what page number it is on? Thanks. Antiochus the Great (talk) 09:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was post in overlaps of Middle power article.It has been removed.You are a very good english writer.Theoretically it's difficult to distinguish great powers at the described levels.Just Canada is border line for demography and military.Germany and Japan are better than France, UK and Italy for economy and demography but not for military or cultural power.Russia lacks totally for economy and partially as cultural power.China lacks for level of life and same India that is much worse in economy (above all in net national wealth that is more important than nominal GDP).USA are the perfect great power as single country. 151.40.23.226 (talk) 09:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)151.40.23.226 (talk) 09:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply