Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Line 21: Line 21:
*[[Special:Contributions/162.213.158.157]]
*[[Special:Contributions/162.213.158.157]]
*[[Special:Contributions/195.211.155.107]]
*[[Special:Contributions/195.211.155.107]]
*[[Special:Contributions/195.211.155.126]]
*[[Special:Contributions/198.23.65.40]]
*[[Special:Contributions/173.239.196.216]]
*[[Special:Contributions/173.239.196.216]]
*[[Special:Contributions/211.20.73.16]]
*[[Special:Contributions/211.20.73.16]]

Revision as of 14:38, 11 February 2014

Sunday, 16 June 2024

Past Discussions

Brazil as superpower

Kinda doubting about it. There might be some who says, but it will need reliable sources, and section may need to be re-written. OccultZone (talk) 22:34, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the section definitely needs some reliable sources. But reliable sources that support Brazil as a potential superpower are thin on the ground. I haven't been able to find any. Brazil is in a very different category than true potential superpowers like China, India and even the European Union. There are lots of academic sources supporting those. Antiochus the Great (talk) 10:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So, re-writing would be best option. OccultZone (talk) 08:17, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on Power (international relations)

Hi, i made this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Power_(international_relations)&diff=593786673&oldid=593409607 I deleted those two references because the first one is about Italy's role in the Mediterranean while the second one is a link is to the main page of Carabinieri. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minorpain (talk • contribs) 21:36, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for informing me. Next time please leave an edit summary when you edit an article, it will help others to understand you edits. Thanks again. Antiochus the Great (talk) 22:20, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suspicious activity

Continued from User talk:The Bushranger#Suspicious activity:

  • Special:Contributions/209.190.227.72
  • Special:Contributions/162.213.158.157
  • Special:Contributions/195.211.155.107
  • Special:Contributions/195.211.155.126
  • Special:Contributions/198.23.65.40
  • Special:Contributions/173.239.196.216
  • Special:Contributions/211.20.73.16

173.239.196.216 blocked yesterday?

At Talk:People's Liberation Army Navy Surface Force, you mention that an IP editor was blocked yesterday for edit warring. Can you point me to the account/IP that was blocked yesterday? It wasn't obvious in that page's diffs; however, if the user is IP hopping to evade the block, that's an issue that needs addressed. —C.Fred (talk) 21:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hes was editing as User talk:61.220.97.93 (Contributions/64.129.10.92) when he got blocked yesterday for his behavior. The IP is using proxies and his IP is jumping from country to country, over the last three days he has been harassing and stalking any article where I have recently made contributions and being highly disruptive. I have been in discussion with an administrator about the IPs disruptive behavior for the past two days, he can confirm whats been going on. Heres a link to the discussion (User talk:The Bushranger#Suspicious activity), its a pretty nasty situation. Antiochus the Great (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think you have the wrong ip, I am addressing the edits. Since there is no discussion first and putting material on People's Liberation Army Navy Surface Force like no tomorrow, are having editors concerned on this. So I contest those edits I noticed, I placed a discussion and so far there is no response.--173.239.196.216 (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious Wikipedia:DUCK . Unlikely your the wrong IP. You exhibit the exact same behavior as the IP using proxies, such as: specifically targeting articles where I have made contributions and targeting my edits only, using deceptive edit summaries to try and cover up what your doing and the same style of language. Given that this behavior has been going on for the past three days, and you are exhibiting the exact same behavior - I find it highly unlikely you are not the same person. Antiochus the Great (talk) 21:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Who is 198? You had your 2 reverts. I have reverted him. Kindly request a admin. The page requires protection. Thanks OccultZone (Talk) 11:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply