Content deleted Content added
Antiochus the Great (talk | contribs) |
Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Additional Director General. Tag: Twinkle |
||
| (205 intermediate revisions by 49 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
R E T I R E D |
|||
{{today cell}} |
|||
'''{{CURRENTTIME}}''' |
|||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == |
|||
== Possibly unfree File:HMS Iron Duke salutes her affiliates in Jersey MoD.jpg == |
|||
A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:HMS Iron Duke salutes her affiliates in Jersey MoD.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files]] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:File:HMS Iron Duke salutes her affiliates in Jersey MoD.jpg|file description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 June 25#File:HMS Iron Duke salutes her affiliates in Jersey MoD.jpg|the discussion]] if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> <font color="navy">[[User:January|January]]</font> <small>(<font color="navy">[[User talk:January|talk]]</font>)</small> 09:31, 25 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Antiochus the Great. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
== Page you might be interested in == |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
[[Talk:Potential superpowers/GA1]], Thanks [[User:OccultZone|'''<span style="color:DarkBlue;">Occult</span><span style="color:blue;">Zone''']] <small>([[User talk:OccultZone#Top|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OccultZone|Contributions]] • [[Special:Log/OccultZone|Log]])</small></span> 03:19, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks! I have replied there. [[User:Antiochus the Great|Antiochus the Great]] ([[User talk:Antiochus the Great#top|talk]]) 11:14, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=866997855 --> |
|||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == |
|||
::I don't think it's going to pass at this point. [[User:Supersaiyen312|Supersaiyen312]] ([[User talk:Supersaiyen312|talk]]) 13:03, 2 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Antiochus the Great. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for June 29== |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Type 997 Artisan 3D]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Mach]] ([[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Type_997_Artisan_3D|check to confirm]] | [[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Type_997_Artisan_3D|fix with Dab solver]]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 08:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=866997855 --> |
|||
== Question == |
|||
==British Armed Forces - regular and reserve manpower figures== |
|||
Hello, you modified the United Kingdoms reserve forces figures here [[List_of_countries_by_number_of_military_and_paramilitary_personnel]]. The source you have included is two years prior to another source listed and provides figures from 2007, as no data is available from 2008 - 2012 in that document for total numbers of reserve forces (including those held at low readiness for a time of need). The 2014 report includes these figures and is accurate. The note that you added says there are two categories of reserves: Fixed Term Contract; and liable to recall. There are probably closer to three types, refered to in the 2014 document as: Volunteer Reserves (those who are on a three year roling contract and attend Army Reserve/RNR/RAF Reserve units for a set period of days each year); Regular Reserves (Those who have left the Regular Forces and remain liable to call-up in time of need); and Full Time Reserve Service (Those who can come from either Volunteer Reserve and Regular Reserve pools but are in a regular military billet on a fixed term contract. These definitions can be found on page 8 and pages 11-13 of the 2014 report. There are others, but the figures are negligable. |
|||
Hi, I see you have indicated you are retired, but I was curious to see if you were still monitoring your talk page, or at least checking in from time to time and if so, would you be willing to respond to a question about your previous contributions? (not a criticism, I am looking for assistance).<p>I'm now also wondering if you are aware of of the "[[Template:Retired|<nowiki>{{retired}}</nowiki>]]" template, which places a more recognizable banner on your user pages. This is actually a few questions now, but any response would be appreciated. Cheers - [[User:Thewolfchild|<span style="color: black">wolf</span>]] 10:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
To cut a long story short - I think you've been confused by the recent change in terminology and have gone with the most recent figures relating to term low readiness reserves, which is woefully out of date. Due to the exponential down turn in the armed forces through redundancies and natural wastage since the 60s the UK Regular Reserve (those that were once regulars and are now help for "times of need") are a tiny fraction of what they once were and whilst this looks weird on paper (or screen in this case) the 2014 report states it to be fact. |
|||
== Retired but ...... reaction to changes from january 2016 at List of Active Russian Navy ships == |
|||
The correct figure should be 82340 total reserves made up of 45110 Regular Reserve and 37190 Volunteer Reserve (What we in the UK actually call "the reserves"). There is a 40 man discrepency in the table for some reason. With your permission I'd like to change the total figure back to 82340 and to amend your note (which I think is a great idea, but uses the wrong terminology) to reflect to true figures from 2014. [[User:Munchingfoo|Munchingfoo]] ([[User talk:Munchingfoo|talk]]) 15:51, 8 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Hi, you are really make that page look pretty but thanks to good meaning you start to begining of ruining whole submarine part of article (and maybe more - I have no time to ceck that now) |
|||
:Hello Munchingfoo! I really appreciate you taking the time to contact me here and explain your position. Regarding the Regular Reserve forces, the British Army website explains the different categories very well [http://www.army.mod.uk/reserve/31789.aspx here], and it applies to the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force too: |
|||
Just for your info: In Russian Navy is main designation their Number: K-535 for example for ship named Vladimir Monomakh and it is different from pennant number which where you named 535 for it and some clever guy delete it totally .... Names are very often changing at RN when new ships takes names from units still in service which serves with new name or without it |
|||
:*The first category is known as the Regular Reserve, which is in turn split into two sub-categories (A and D). Category A is mandatory, so any soldier, airman or sailor ''must'' serve in category A upon leaving the Regular military. Category D is voluntary, whereby those who have served their time in category A can voluntarily choose to extend their service in the Regular Reserve. |
|||
If you come back in future I will be glad to you if you will editing only pages which is familiar to you - you was spend lot of time to make changes and someone will now spend lot of time to fixing that --[[User:Hornet24|Hornet24]] ([[User talk:Hornet24|talk]]) 22:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:*The second category is the Long Term Reserve. Since 1997, any ex-Regular who no-longer serves in category A and D is automatically part of the Long Term Reserve until the age of 55. |
|||
:You came to the page of a guy that does not edit anymore to tell him not to not edit anymore? All because of an edit he made '''four years''' prior? If you think an article is somehow broken, then [[wp:bold|fix it]]... and if you already have, then problem solved.<p>Anyway, I just popped in to see if AtG has been around, but unfortunately it doesn't seem he has, so I guess I'll try again later. - [[User:Thewolfchild|<span style="color: black">wolf</span>]] 23:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC) {{tps}} |
|||
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Additional Director General]]== |
|||
[[Image:Information icon4.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]] |
|||
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read [[WP:Your first article|the guide to writing your first article]].</p><p>You may want to consider using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard|Article Wizard]] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} |
|||
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on [[:Additional Director General]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A3|section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the [[Wikipedia:Help desk|help]] or [[Wikipedia:Reference desk|reference]] desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see [[Wikipedia:Stub#Essential information about stubs|Wikipedia:Stub]] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on [[Wikipedia:Notability|notable]] subjects and should provide references to [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verify]] their content. |
|||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Additional Director General|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Additional+Director+General|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request [[WP:RFUD|here]]. <!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Jmertel23|Jmertel23]] ([[User talk:Jmertel23|talk]]) 11:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:*The third category are the pensioners, but no MoD publications I have come across have ever reported their strength, so we can ignore these and not discuss them. |
|||
:Categories A and D of the Regular Reserve serve under a fixed-term reserve contract and are required to report for training or military service when necessary (when called up they are known as the Full Time Reserve Service). Note that these contracts are similar to those of the Volunteer Reserves, but at the same time they are also distinctly different! The Long Term Reserve, however, do not serve under any contract, instead, they remain liable to be recalled in a time of need (or national emergency) under the Reserve Forces Act. Recent MoD publications now only report the strength of the A and D Regular Reserves, which numbered 45,110. They also report the strength of the Volunteer Reserves which numbered 37,190 - but they no-longer report the strength of the Long Term Reserve, and have never reported the strength of the Pensioners. |
|||
:The last reported strength of the Long Term Reserve was 127,440 in 2007. Therefore, I added the 45,110 personnel of the Category A and D Regular Reserve together with the 127,440 Long Term Reserve and got 172,550 reserves. |
|||
:Since 2012, MoD publications have been including the Volunteer Reserve along with the active Regular military. You can see this [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/310468/quarterly_personnel_report_apr14.pdf here in table 1, page 6]. Notice how the MoD combine the active Regulars with the Volunteer Reserve and call it "UK Forces Service Personnel" (or simply "UK Service Personnel"). This is because of the changes made in the 2010 SDSR and the 2011 "Future Reserves 2020 Review" - as since then, the Volunteer Reserve has been tasked with performing a larger role in UK defence as part of a new "integrated armed forces". So I used the MoD figure of 198,810 for the active personnel. |
|||
I hope this explains my reasoning well enough. [[User:Antiochus the Great|Antiochus the Great]] ([[User talk:Antiochus the Great#top|talk]]) 17:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== India == |
|||
Hi.....it seems that India has 3 references as a great power....although I'm not sure if that's enough...maybe we can mention about India in a small paragraph in the Aftermath of Cold War section and a line in the lead. Thanks, '''<span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px lightskyblue;">[[User:Strike Eagle|<span style="color:#F62817">ƬheStrike</span>]][[User talk:Strike Eagle|<span style="color:#1673F5">Σagle</span>]]</span>''' 15:41, 16 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:Those 3 sources are good quality academic sources, so I feel that it is more than enough. In fact, India now has more recent academic sources than many of the great powers already mentioned in the article! I added a paragraph on India in the Aftermath of Cold War section and added a 4th academic citation which called India a great power. Personally I think that the map needs to be changed to add India too. [[User:Antiochus the Great|Antiochus the Great]] ([[User talk:Antiochus the Great#top|talk]]) 09:28, 17 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::Glad you added it...I feel India could be added in the map with a mention as a new great power or something that way. Map change would need consensus anyway. '''<span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px lightskyblue;">[[User:Strike Eagle|<span style="color:#F62817">ƬheStrike</span>]][[User talk:Strike Eagle|<span style="color:#1673F5">Σagle</span>]]</span>''' 16:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
[https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/10626536_566888770081676_5928676376789034499_n.jpg?oh=85f2ec4f86abb91beaa1178db2dc32ed&oe=5471E6E6&__gda__=1417281594_ba51b135793d398197a7f09d5a7d5619 On a lighter note...] {{smiley|5}} {{smiley|5}} '''<span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px lightskyblue;">[[User:Strike Eagle|<span style="color:#F62817">ƬheStrike</span>]][[User talk:Strike Eagle|<span style="color:#1673F5">Σagle</span>]]</span>''' 16:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Recruiting poster == |
|||
Greetings, I stumbled across [http://warof1812ingeorgia.com/Page8.html this] while working on another project. It's gotta be in the public domain.--<span style="background:#C2C2C2">[[User:Gaarmyvet|<font color="red">'''Jim in Georgia'''</font> ]][[Special:Contributions/Gaarmyvet|<font color="white">''Contribs''</font> ]][[User Talk:Gaarmyvet|<font color="blue">'''Talk'''</font>]] </span> 19:31, 7 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Italy as great power == |
|||
It seems you don't like a lot [[Italy ]],i'm sorry for you but it has a huge weight in the world at every level.If India (or Brazil) should be added as [[ great power ]] why not Italy that economically overtakes Russia and on the military Germany?Italy overtakes economically India too as GDP and national net wealth above all.Italy overtakes as national net wealth UK too.It seems the new chief of PESD and PESC of EU is [[ Federica Mogherini ]].Italy in EU is rapresented also by the ECB President [[ Mario Draghi ]].Italy weighs..and a lot.People added Japan and Germany just to justify France,UK and Russia in great powers list.If i well remember Italy leads [[ Uniting for Consensus ]] that now rapresents 120 states in UN.The only 2 real great powers are USA and China.USA and EU are in fact the only superpowers and China a real potential superpower.Academics opinions aren't sufficient above all when they are partial or based on not complete informations or dated[[Special:Contributions/151.40.34.81|151.40.34.81]] ([[User talk:151.40.34.81|talk]]) 12:07, 8 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:Italy is irrelevant in the context of today great powers. This is reflected in the numerous academic publications which do not mention Italy as being a great power, rather a middle power of little note. [[User:Antiochus the Great|Antiochus the Great]] ([[User talk:Antiochus the Great#top|talk]]) 16:38, 8 November 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Middle power]] == |
|||
Please don't falsify a source. The book ''Strategic Vision: America & the Crisis of Global Power'' doesn't mention India as a Great power, [http://books.google.com.au/books?id=RWVVAQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Strategic+Vision:+America+%26+the+Crisis+of+Global+Power&hl=en&sa=X&ei=UuPbU4KKEcOSuASg-oC4Ag&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Strategic%20Vision%3A%20America%20%26%20the%20Crisis%20of%20Global%20Power&f=false here] is the online version of that book. When I fixed this false remark and put the online link of the book, you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Middle_power&oldid=619482206&diff=prev reverted] me leaving an edit summary "''Restore sourced material''". This is purely unconstructive, don't repeat it again. [[User:Nomian|Nomian]] ([[User talk:Nomian|talk]]) 13:49, 12 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:Actually, that publication does mention India as being a great power, along with the 5 permanent members of the UNSC, Japan and Germany. Why don't you actually read the book before making such accusations? [[User:Antiochus the Great|Antiochus the Great]] ([[User talk:Antiochus the Great#top|talk]]) 16:34, 8 November 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== ITALY == |
|||
Why did you change [[Italy]] article without passing by Italy Talk?First of all Italy is a leading middle power and able to exert its influence on a global scale AS CITED IN THE CITATION POSTED.A major european power AT LEAST a leading or major leading power,i repeat at least.The rest are your personal opinions.The fact that you changed the italian status sveral stimes shows that you haven't well focused Italy.As reported in Italy Talk Lifeintechnicolors you seem to have a anti italian view.You like to low italian image to make better appear some other images like UK in these presentations.Italy and India in Wikipedia are like 2 states (in reality they are great powers,not in the web or in people thinking that read Wikipedia articles-reality is different from appearing or movies) in no man's land.Connected to Italy is Vatican too that is more important than all other powers.Italy as middle power can't be compared to Austria for e.g..Italy is a major middle power able to exert its influence on a global scale this must be well explained,the sentence at the moment is not clear.You should pass by Italy Talk before than changing to have people agreement.Citations aren't sufficient neither complete. |
|||
FOCUS & DOUBTS |
|||
In Wikipedia there people of different religions and believes.I wonder for istance how of a freemasonery of the egyptian rite can write bad things on Napoleon or russian leaders like Putin.I've more than an half idea of administrators or editors like them.Same for other lines of religions or belivers.Do we want to open an article on "Human behaviour and acting in Wikipedia"? |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/151.40.67.21|151.40.67.21]] ([[User talk:151.40.67.21|talk]]) 10:31, 26 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
I've deleted a couple of your posts on [[Talk:Italy]] when I excised the IP's posts (sock of Mediolanum). Hope you don't mind. --[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 22:12, 30 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:No problem NeilN, thanks for notifying me, much appreciated. [[User:Antiochus the Great|Antiochus the Great]] ([[User talk:Antiochus the Great#top|talk]]) 22:40, 30 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Thanks == |
|||
Thanks for watching my talk page. That editor has caused more than one of us to question his [[WP:CIR|competence]]. --[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 22:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Barak 8 as an ABM system== |
|||
:Check out source in article ".Barak gets bigger and better" It mentions barak as a possible ABM weapons system. Worth checking out. Given the precident of [[Iron Dome]] in terms of its remarkably fast development and increasing maturity, This I think should be mentioned somewhere on mainspace. |
|||
Any thoughts? Ta for pruning that bloated see also section too. Cheers [[User:Irondome|Irondome]] ([[User talk:Irondome|talk]]) 03:22, 25 November 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::Yes I mentioned Barak 8s possible use as an ABM weapon in the article, as it is quite an important piece of information, I used a source from defence industry daily. I also added a little information about an ER variant of Barak 8 that will increase its range to 100 km and is reported to eventually equip the future project 15B destroyers. If you ever find good sources, please don't hesitate to add them to the article! Cheers! [[User:Antiochus the Great|Antiochus the Great]] ([[User talk:Antiochus the Great#top|talk]]) 14:09, 25 November 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Africa as a Superpower == |
|||
I noticed you reverted my recent addition to the "Potential Superpowers" page. I would have left it as you had put it, however, you gave no defense as to why I should not have edited. I have deleted your revision on the page, regarding little or no defense of a somewhat important change. If you have a solution that you think would put this to rest, I encourage you to visit my talk page. Happy Christmas! [[User:Kieran P. Clark|Kieran P. Clark]] ([[User talk:Kieran P. Clark|talk]]) 16:51, 26 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:It is fairly obvious why I reverted your addition of Africa to the article. Africa is not a legal entity and therefore cannot attain the status of superpower, just as any arbitrary group of countries cannot. Furthermore, you provided no reliable sources that argue the merits of Africa being a potential superpower. My solution is that your edits are unsuitable and should remain reverted. I notice another editor reverted your changes too. That should tell you something! Thank you, and happy holidays to you too! [[User:Antiochus the Great|Antiochus the Great]] ([[User talk:Antiochus the Great#top|talk]]) 19:41, 26 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
==January 2015== |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your '''only warning'''; if you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, as you did at [[:Royal Air Force]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. [[User:Tadeusz Nowak|Tadeusz Nowak]] ([[User talk:Tadeusz Nowak|talk]]) 05:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tadeusz_Nowak&diff=641047331&oldid=641045287 Note]. --[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 05:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Middle power]] == |
|||
You've been around too long for me to lecture. Please be careful. [[User:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkRed">Tide</span>''']][[User talk:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:darkRed">rolls'''</span>]] 15:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Removal of referenced content == |
|||
Hello, can I ask you why you make this edit? ([[Special:diff/633226371]] & [[Special:diff/633226517]])? You say removal of original map and removal of unreferenced content, then '''why you remove multiple cited''' content?, but at the same time, Royal Canadian Navy that got no reference at all didn't get removed? Please stop this kind of edit.--<font style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #FF0000; color: #ffffff;">[[User:Aldnonymous|AldNon]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Aldnonymous|Ucallin?☎]]</sup> 19:56, 21 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:None are specifically accompanied with a reference that describes them being a green-water navy.[[User:Antiochus the Great|Antiochus the Great]] ([[User talk:Antiochus the Great#top|talk]]) 21:35, 4 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== [[List of modern equipment of the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force]] == |
|||
Someone deleted the "infantry weapons" because of source problems, when in fact it has source in the links. Maybe they want inline citations. Can you repair it? I just saw you added contents on that page before, so i think maybe you can help. |
|||
[[User:Suneditor|Suneditor]] ([[User talk:Suneditor|talk]]) 09:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Potential superpowers' headnote == |
|||
Consider reading [[Talk:Potential superpowers#Head note]]. Thanks. [[User:OccultZone|'''<span style="color:DarkBlue;">Occult</span><span style="color:blue;">Zone</span>''']] <small>([[User talk:OccultZone#Top|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OccultZone|Contributions]] • [[Special:Log/OccultZone|Log]])</small> 05:13, 5 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for March 18== |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Green-water navy]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[AEGIS]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Green-water_navy check to confirm] | [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Green-water_navy fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 08:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Hello :) == |
|||
Hey Antiochus the Great, yes you are right about barak 8 not fitted in Kamorta class, I didn't check the source :). happy to see you again how are you doing ?.[[User:Nicky mathew|Nicky mathew]] ([[User talk:Nicky mathew|talk]]) 21:22, 28 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:Hey! No problem Mathew. I am fine thanks, hope you're keeping well too. Keep up the good work and cheers for the friendly message :) [[User:Antiochus the Great|Antiochus the Great]] ([[User talk:Antiochus the Great#top|talk]]) 21:25, 28 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:{{ping|Antiochus the Great}} :) [[User:Nicky mathew|Nicky mathew]] ([[User talk:Nicky mathew|talk]]) 21:33, 28 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Indian Navy == |
|||
Antiochus the Great! Great to see you! The LCU MK IVs are in active service(4)! You can check the images of all the four launched MK IV..! Only four of the eight are still under construction! I mentioned the MK IVs in the page only after confirming that they are in active service. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Launch_of_Yard_2094_(3).jpg http://indiannavy.nic.in/press-release/3rd-lcu-mk-iv-project-launched-grse http://indiablooms.com/ibns_new/news-details/N/9242/fourth-lcu-for-indian-navy-launched-at-grse.html. --Jaaron95 07:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
In https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Indian_Navy_ships, you edited the class of LCUs to MKIV and MKIII... How can a class of ship be just it's versions?? I think mentioning "LCU" will be good.. And I would love to patrol new pages.. As I'm a bit newbie, can you guide me whether I should post a request or is it given automatically?? --Jaaron95 13:50, 30 March 2015 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jaaron95|Jaaron95]] ([[User talk:Jaaron95|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jaaron95|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Future of the Indian navy == |
|||
Hi again,3 months ago I saw a news article regarding Saryu class, they mention the class as capable of being upgraded to a light frigate standard and now i tried to find that article now but I didn't get yet.if I manage find it, then I will let you know and we will discuss whether to add it or not. Another thing that I want to ask you is about '''status''' of ships, in your recent edits you removed number of ships from status section now it's confusing for the readings to understand how many are under construction, how many are in sea trails in the same class of ships for eg see Kolkata class status , I think we should also mention no. of ships their itself rather than taking it to the '''note''' side. thank you :) [[User:Nicky mathew|Nicky mathew]] ([[User talk:Nicky mathew|talk]]) 14:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:Yes, if you can find the news article again, or another source which supports the Saryu class capable of being upgraded to light frigate, then we can mention it in the article. [[User:Antiochus the Great|Antiochus the Great]] ([[User talk:Antiochus the Great#top|talk]]) 16:37, 30 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
==how many personnel in bangladesh air force=== |
|||
please imagaine that the total number of bangladesh armed forces cant be 157000 if the air force personnel is 52000 and the naval force is 48000. Sri Lanka Army has larger force than Sri Lanka Navy and Sri Lanka Air Force. Bangladesh Army cant have only 57000 personnel...[[User:MilitaryBangla|MilitaryBangla]] ([[User talk:MilitaryBangla|talk]]) 15:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:The personnel figure for the Bangladesh Air Force is not accompanied by any citation, and the citation that is provided for the Bangladesh Navy doesn't even work. I would therefore suggest that those figures are incorrect, not the International Institute of Strategic Studies which is very reliable and authoritative source.[[User:Antiochus the Great|Antiochus the Great]] ([[User talk:Antiochus the Great#top|talk]]) 16:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 11:19, 15 February 2021
R E T I R E D
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Antiochus the Great. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Antiochus the Great. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Question[edit]
Hi, I see you have indicated you are retired, but I was curious to see if you were still monitoring your talk page, or at least checking in from time to time and if so, would you be willing to respond to a question about your previous contributions? (not a criticism, I am looking for assistance).
I'm now also wondering if you are aware of of the "{{retired}}" template, which places a more recognizable banner on your user pages. This is actually a few questions now, but any response would be appreciated. Cheers - wolf 10:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
[edit]
Hi, you are really make that page look pretty but thanks to good meaning you start to begining of ruining whole submarine part of article (and maybe more - I have no time to ceck that now)
Just for your info: In Russian Navy is main designation their Number: K-535 for example for ship named Vladimir Monomakh and it is different from pennant number which where you named 535 for it and some clever guy delete it totally .... Names are very often changing at RN when new ships takes names from units still in service which serves with new name or without it
If you come back in future I will be glad to you if you will editing only pages which is familiar to you - you was spend lot of time to make changes and someone will now spend lot of time to fixing that --Hornet24 (talk) 22:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- You came to the page of a guy that does not edit anymore to tell him not to not edit anymore? All because of an edit he made four years prior? If you think an article is somehow broken, then fix it... and if you already have, then problem solved.
Anyway, I just popped in to see if AtG has been around, but unfortunately it doesn't seem he has, so I guess I'll try again later. - wolf 23:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
Speedy deletion nomination of Additional Director General[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Additional Director General requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jmertel23 (talk) 11:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)