Thanks for uploading Image:Lou Gehrig best 800.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 04:29, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Hey, how ya doin? I noticed you added some pics to the Sybil Ludington page, I have a hunch you live in that area. I myself grew up about a quarter-mile from her grave (which is partly why I did some work on the article). How bout you?

Sorry for the delay in responding to your message, but you didn't leave a link and I had to reply to my own talk page. I don't live in the area, but I visit Putnam County once in a while. I like to take pictures in the area. If you visit the articles for Carmel and Patterson, you will see more of my pictures. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony22 (talk • contribs)

Hi, thanks for donating the images. I don't think it's really appropriate to add images of family graves to living people, I moved the De Niro one to his father's article Robert De Niro, Sr.. Arniep 00:29, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You going by the Putname County cemeteries any time soon? --evrik 14:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC) We got a photo of the grave we needed. Thanks for your offer! --evrik 17:11, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I actually confirmed your info right here on WP, which I should have done before reverting your edit. My only defense is that I saw an unsourced assertion in an article that is a frequent target for vandalism. Subtle vandalisms which add false info to an article are particularly dangerous because they can damage WP's credibility. I already replaced your material; sorry if I caused you any concern : ) Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 01:36, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I disagree; find a photograph of the man, not his headstone. Frankly, it could be any Nast; there's no name on it confirming him. In any case, it's trivial. This isn't a dead site for fans, though I love gravestones and graveyards as much as the next guy. I really don't think a gravestone pic belongs in an encyclopaedia article, even if you have posted many before. Frankly, such an image isn't important unless (a) the gravesite is extraordinary and of wide interest (ie architecturally, like the tomb of Warren G. Harding) or (b) it is being used to illustrate the posthumous devotion of fans, ie Oscar Wilde or the lead singer of the Doors.Mowens35 01:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the photo of the Babe Ruth headstone from that article for reasons similar to those cited by Mowens35 (above). Frankly, the photo does not add any value to the article: it is not architecturally or stylistically unique and doesn't say anything about Babe Ruth himself. To quote Mowens35: "I really don't think a gravestone pic belongs in an encyclopaedia article, even if you have posted many before." Sorry to be so blunt, Oscar 14:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Anthony22. I have to agree with Mowens35 and Oscar, all the grave pictures are a bit much. I was looking at the Gate of Heaven Cemetery page because most of my dead family members are buried there and you had added gravestone pictures too all of the famous people listed there. I then checked out what your other contributions were and it seems that you've done this to a lot of people. The point of an article is to talk about what made the person famous and why they are important. A headstone doesn't have to do with their life unless in the words of Mowens35, " A) the gravesite is extraordinary and of wide interest (i.e. architecturally, like the tomb of Warren G. Harding) or B) it is being used to illustrate the posthumous devotion of fans (i.e. Oscar Wilde or the Jim Morrison)" There's no need for pictures of gravestones on people who don't have famous gravesites. It's kinda creepy to have pictures of gravestones on people's pages when there aren't any pictures of them when they were living. I think from now on in the future, you probably shouldn't put up all of those pictures. I can see you live in Westchester and you like to take pictures of other things in Westchester. So why don't you continue to do that instead of taking anymore gravestone pictures. I won't remove the pictures that are already up. But if an Admin came along and saw the pictures, they might remove them because 1) they don't enhance the article or add to the understanding of the person 2) you don't need them for most people 3) It's kinda weird. I hope you understand. Hdog13 04:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I did clean it up. The wording was not neutral at all, and, more importantly, it was copied straight from the school's website. Unless the school relicenses the text on their website under the GFDL, it should be removed anyway. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shanel (talk • contribs) 00:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The text from the school's website will have to go; it's a copyright violation. But, if you wrote the text about the football team yourself, that can stay. I thought that perhaps it was copied from an offline source or was on the school website at some point in time (as some copyvios are); my apologies.--§hanel 00:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:Fair use. Judging by your edit history you need to familiarize yourself with it. No worries though, I made a lot of mistakes when I first started up as does everybody. Quadzilla99 02:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, that image is (most likely) copyrighted by the publisher of the book, so the source and copyright need to be identified as such. This would mean it could only be used under a claim of fair use, but as Quadzilla mentioned, there are many restrictions to the use of fair use images. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 02:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Michael_Jordan_202.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been on the staff and written histories of aspects of Fordham. The address of Fordham for purposes of the postal service, taxes, real estate records, etc., is Fordham Road. The Ram plaque is on the "main drive" in from the Fordham Road gate. The records for all Fordham-related issues are under "fordham Road." The provincial's office was Fordham Road, and the main drive from Fordham Road leads to the front door oif the administration buildings. The entrance picture was originally for Fordham Hospital, now gone (which is where the parking lots now are). The fact that drivers to the school use that lot does not make it the official main entrance.HarvardOxon 02:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anthony. Thanks for taking the trouble to add the picture of Peter Revson. Unfortunately the copyright for that picture still belongs to the photographer who took it, or possibly the magazine who may have bought the rights from him/her. Scanning the picture in does not constitute creating a new image, but copying an existing one. The GFDL license is therefore not appropriate as the rights to the picture are not yours to release. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Image_guidelines. 4u1e 07:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please correct the license template you have used for all the images that you have scanned. The copyright belongs to the photographer/publisher, not you, so you don't have the rights to release it under GFDL. You have been warned before about this. Please cease uploading new images until your previous uploads have been corrected. If they aren't fixed, the images are subject to deletion. If you have any questions, leave a message for me on my talk page. Thanks and have a good day. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 07:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Whitman_300.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Betty_&_Dan_200.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bryant_200.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 12:53, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:01 Patterson grave.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:001 Patterson.JPG. The copy called Image:001 Patterson.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dorothy_300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was preparing to move Image:01 Patterson grave.JPG to Wikimedia Commons so it can be used on other Wikimedia projects, but there is conflicting license information on the image page. You state that you release it under GFDL, but farther down you also state that you place it in the public domain. You can't do both as the concepts are mutually exclusive. Please remove one or the other of the license tags, and if you feel up to it, you can also move the image to the Commons so other projects can use it. If you don't move it, someone else will get around to it. --Darkwind (talk) 06:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This image shows small pebels/rocks on the headstone, three on the left (as well as some fallen into the grass) and one on the right. This is a Jewish custom when visiting a gravesite; it suggests more than one person linked to them personally had been to the grave within a year of the photograph's date. Shir-El too 15:15, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Floyd_Patterson#Photograph_of_grave_of_Floyd_Patterson

Hello, the pic is still there, it is your original, on floyd's talk page you said many things are done wrong on wikipedia? LOL, welcome to the club. I have an account with over 2000 edits(in few months), there is even some talk on my talk page requesting my assistance and to apply for administratorship, i say never, not for any money, dont waste your life here, build your own site. I did not touch that account since April. Way too many people have been suspended here for being somebody they are not, or tried to help. Check wikipedia-watch.org site, will tell you more. But that does not mean you should not correct mistakes. And there are tons of them here. Hopefully some day there will be new wikipedia leadership, i'd do so much to change things here, it's a jungle!

As far as Floyd goes, he should be remembered as a great champion, we do not have many gentlemen left in boxing these days.

For your info...

Floyd Patterson who became champion in 1956 at 21 & 10 months, (Patterson was originally trying for a light heavyweight title but after marciano's retirement was moved to heavyweight division with high #5 rating on may 2 1956), boxers like willie pep, bobbo olson and patterson stood for some culture/ a boxer should be a gentleman in and out of ring. IN their lifes they have proven it.

But it goes to show you that Floyd waited for Rocky's retirement, he simply did not want to be moved to the heavyweight division.

Laters amigo.

Thank you for uploading Image:CC Mall Walk.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 23:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:New Roc City NR.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:11, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:W.C. Handy Place 800.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:W.C. Handy Place.jpg. The copy called Image:W.C. Handy Place.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 00:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is in the references under the "Death" subsection. Therefore, it should not be in the External links. Chessy999 (talk) 22:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony22 - I would like to talk to you about possibly using one of your images in a documentary. How might I reach you? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hitch & Plow (talk • contribs) 17:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Crane_200ab.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The informatrion you cited was removed in error, not intentionally. The next time you have a question about one of my edits, I suggest you approach me in a civil manner and do so on my discussion page, not my user page. Please refer to the Wikipedia pages about civility, wikiquette, and assuming good faith before leaving anyone another rude message. Thank you. MovieMadness (talk) 18:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Anthony, thanks for getting in touch. Your encounter with the camera Nazis sounds like what happened to me when I visited the British Library in London with my digital cam in hand; all I wanted was a picture of the only surviving manuscript of Beowulf, is that so much to ask? They kindly held my camera until I was ready to leave, sheesh.

Anyway, I'm readying Marshall's article for WP:GAN and hopefully WP:FAC, which is kind of a big deal, so that's why I'm particularly anal about things at the moment. The reason why the information about Marshall's burial is mentioned in past tense is so it can match with the rest of the section; to suddenly switch it to "Bob Marshall is buried" is grammatically awkward and incorrect. Although it is interesting and noteworthy that he is buried with the rest of his family, including one sister who eerily died at the same young age as he did, I think it's more important to stick to the established tense and note that he was buried next to his parents; what happened after, in present tense, doesn't exactly fit. I hope you don't mind me reverting back, and I do appreciate the input, but I want only the best for this article and for Marshall's legacy, nitpicky grammar and all. :) Take care and better luck visiting other historic cemeteries, María (habla conmigo) 23:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see no problem with Aaliyah being listed, as are the other names of famous persons, but if you started listing all "private rooms" the article would be flooded. Someone that is interested in finding the location can get a list at the office. It is not pertinent where you placed it. Doc ♬ talk 07:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Amanda Blake. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Unruh_201.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:59, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Jean harris 100.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TwoMightyGods^Persuasion_Necessity 21:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did not intend to delete the cheerleader picture. My apologies!--JConoco (talk) 02:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any other photos relating to the high school? either the building, campus or students?--JConoco (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I was thinking the article wld benefit from the addition of certain photos (ie: the 'new wing', the clocktower(close-up, the 'Whitney Young Auditorium' of athletic type images). --JConoco (talk) 02:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for photographing and uploading your pic for Saint Paul's Church National Historic Site. I don't know why exactly, but no one else has been able to get there, and it has been a notable gap in photo coverage of historic sites in NYS. If you have another pic or two from other angles, or inside, I would love to see those added, too.

If you're not aware, there's a List of NHLs in NY which is very nearly complete in terms of photos, and there's List of Registered Historic Places in Westchester County, New York, which could use more additions. Thanks again, keep up the good work! doncram (talk) 21:01, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding that pic; can you give coordinates for the grave, please (likewise for any other graves you may have photographed)? Grave coordinates can be added to several infoboxes using resting_place_coordinates or similar; for info on finding coordinates, see: Wikipedia:Obtaining geographic coordinates. Note that such coordinates should be specific to the grave-site not general coordinates for the cemetery. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 21:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be grateful for a reply to my question, please.Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 22:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nudge. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:06, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! I have to say I'm jealous of the number of graves you've been able to upload. I wanted to make a note, however. Have you heard of Wikimedia Commons? If you upload images there instead of here on Wikipedia, members of any Wikimedia project can use them, not just those of us on the English language version. Check out my gallery of graves, by the way: [[1]]. --Midnightdreary (talk) 21:57, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright information is inadequate. I thought you'd like to fix this. Images w/o proper copyright information can be deleted on sight. -- Cat ^chi? 21:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Harry_Houdini_Grave_Marker_1024.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:37, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:M R 800.jpg, an image uploaded from this account in April 2006, is now available as File:Max Reinhardt 800.jpg (Commons:File:Max Reinhardt 800.jpg). — Athaenara ✉ 04:41, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:01 Vin Learson grave.JPG The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you upload to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:01 Yonkers Raceway.JPG. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:01 Paine cottage.JPG. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:47, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:1 Albert Hodge 800.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:1 Billie Burke best 800.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 03:00, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:1 Bonwit 800.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 13:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:1 Cagney best 800.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 13:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:1 David Sarnoff 800.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:1 Dorsey best 800.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:1 Dutch Schultz 800.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:1 Gate of Heaven best 800.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:1 Harry Frazee 800.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 16:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:1 Peter Arno 800.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 17:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 Julie Haydon.JPG, an image uploaded to Wikipedia from this account in April 2007, is now File:1 Julie Haydon.jpg (Commons:File:1 Julie Haydon.jpg). — Athaenara ✉ 17:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:1 Queen of Peace 800.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:1 Sal Mineo cr.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:36, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony, I have to delete the photo you took of the lake at the Kensico Cemetery, because "lake.jpg" is too generic a filename, and other people have uploaded completely different lake photos.

Don't worry, though - I'm going to re-upload it as "Lake at Kensico Cemetery.jpg" (unless you'd prefer it be called something else instead).

Let me know within the next 24 hours. DS (talk) 19:41, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:1Iona Prep 800.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:16 West fairway.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2 horses 800.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Two Horses at Tilly Foster Farm, Southeast, New York.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Two Horses at Tilly Foster Farm, Southeast, New York.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eddie Foy Park.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Eddie Foy Park.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:56, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eddie Foy Plaque cr.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Eddie Foy Plaque cr.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:56, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eastchester Town Hall 800.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Eastchester Town Hall 800.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Anthony22. I have some misgivings about the publication of your latest cheerleader photo, and I've asked for advice at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Advice please: Personally identifiable image of teenage girl. --Orlady (talk) 16:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No point in deleting the image -- unless and until someone more knowledgable than either of us says it needs to go. I posted on the noticeboard in hopes of getting some advice on the regarding policy on that kind of image, because I know that Wikimedia has sensitivities about stuff like that. I think it's probably OK, since the guideline at Commons seems to allow for photos taken in a public place, as long as the photos aren't uncomplimentary of the subject. --Orlady (talk) 00:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'd noticed you have added some to Find A Grave to some articles. That's perfectly fine, but I would like to encourage you to use the template for the site. This gives us consistent display of the site and also allows us to track which articles have links. If you would when you add the link, use this: {{findagrave|GrID}}. For Ed Gein, for instance, it would look like this: {{findagrave|089170}}. The grave ID number is just after the "GRid=" in the link. You don't have to put anything else, it's all done by the template. Thanks so much. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I appreciate that you've added all the information to the article, but there are problems with it. An encyclopedia actually *can* cover too much information on one thing. What has happened on Iona's page is that there's paragraphs upon paragraphs on the football history. But it's not an article about Iona Prep Football. It's an article about the school. The amount of information on the football program dwarfs the rest of the article.

There's a horribly uneven slant towards their football teams. There's barely a passive mention of any of the other sports. The football sections are too long and contain way too much information. For example, the scores of every game in the seasons covered and in depth analyses is absolutely not necessary, and one could argue that it violates WP:ENC. The sections are written like essays to promote the school's program. The football section should be reduced to a few shorter paragraphs that mention the school's football history. The paragraphs also use sentences like "Tyrae Woodson-Samuels and Jeff Mack spearheaded one of the most prolific offenses in the history of the CHSFL as Iona Prep steamrollered undefeated through 12 consecutive games.", which uses words that only make the history sound nicer and makes the article look pretty (bolded), and even uses a peacock term (which is italicized). I believe that the football sections need to be completely rewritten so that they're entirely neutral and are completely encyclopedic.

I understand that you don't feel qualified to add history on the other sections, that's why I added the tags, so that other editors could add such information. You're not the only editor that frequents the page, I'm sure.  AcroX  17:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that you disapprove of my previous edit in which I removed File:Bob Marshall Burial Site 1000.jpg from Bob Marshall (wilderness activist), but may I remind you to assume good faith? My edit was not vandalism, nor was it in any way intended as malicious. I admit that I did not consider the technical difficulties that you may have had in obtaining such an image; rather, I was concerned with its lack of aesthetic appeal in an article that is already sufficiently illustrated. I fail to see why two images are required to illustrate Marshall's final resting place, when most biographies rarely have one. While removing this image, I kept the one of his tombstone (obviously the most important of the two), and added a free image of Marshall himself elsewhere in the article. With both images in the "Later efforts and sudden death" section, it looks crowded. The main reason for its removal, however, is that the image is incredibly dark, practically covered in shadow, and its subject only becomes clear when one clicks on it. Even then it's very difficult to read what's on the tombstones. In short, I question its ability to enhance the article or add to the understanding of the subject matter, which is what images should do.

As you can see, my edit was not "indiscriminate"; quite the opposite. It would have been impossible for me to explain my reasons for removing the image in an edit summary, which is why I used the benign term "cleaning up pictures" instead. I still don't believe it warrants inclusion in the article, which has obtained Featured Article status and must therefore maintain a high quality. Whether it remains or not, the image is included at the Commons, where any Wikipedia project may find and use it. Your work remains. I hope you reconsider the addition of this particular image, but either way thank you for contacting me with your concerns. María (habla conmigo) 12:59, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply, Anthony. I'm aware of a photographer's inability to change the circumstances of the scene they're photographing, and I didn't mean my above comments to insult your abilities as a photographer, so please don't take this personally. I'm commenting on the image, not you. As it is, the image is difficult to make out and therefore does not add to the article. As for the newest addition, I found it on the Forest Service's website, but I'm fairly sure it was included in Glover's biography. There are tons of photos I've found via searches that I would love to include in articles, as well, but copyright is always an issue, I agree. María (habla conmigo) 13:35, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bust of Jacob K. Javits at Javits Convention Center.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:34, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Marilyn Monroe, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 05:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:58, 20 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Victor Borge Mermaid 800.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Powers ^T 23:48, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anthony22,

is it possible to upload the Albert Lasker Mausoleum.JPG linked in Albert Lasker to Commons? I want use it for article Albert Lasker in German WP, the translation is in progress de:Benutzer:Starshollow/Albert Lasker. Thanks. --Starshollow (talk) 13:34, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:John McGillicuddy Gravesite 2011.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hi, i noticed that they were deleting your photo [2], which i have re-uploaded to en:wikipedia here [3] hope you don't mind. Slowking4: 7@1|x 17:28, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, regarding this edit, please read WP:ENGVAR. LadyofShalott 02:39, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Frankie Manning Nov. 07, 2011.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:31, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Jessica Dragonette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Hawthorne

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:36, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Pat McDonald (athlete), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hawthorne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited J. Gordon Edwards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minarets (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Henri Bendel Memorial 2010.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tuckahoe Tigers 2010 NYS Football Champions.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 23:45, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wariner C 400.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Whitman 200.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Susan Smith DL.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:17, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Revson 200.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:18, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lorenzo Charles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Raleigh and Oakwood Cemetery

Jay Paterno (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bill O'Brien

Joe Paterno (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bill O'Brien

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please stop adding links to the site Find A Grave. This site has repeatedly been determined to fail both WP:RS and WP:EL criteria and should not be added. You seem to be doing it a lot, so I thought I should let you know.

We have had problems with people from the site Find A Grave coming here and purposefully adding their site everywhere. Many editors see it as a form of mass spamming.

Furthermore, please stop putting the m for minor tag on your edits when you are adding content. That's not what the tag is for. Using it that way is highly misleading. Some people automatically hide all minor edits from their watchlist, and by marking your non-minor edits as minor you are making it difficult for people to see what you are doing. I hope that was only a mistake. DreamGuy (talk) 19:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Don May, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NIT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance you can add the date of this memorial? Can we assume 1972? As a 3D artwork, photography of it for WP is not allowed under the current US copyright laws, but they only apply post 1990. If it's pre 1990, also need to add the correct template when it gets moved to commons - see Freedom_of_panorama#United_States  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I don't know the date of construction of any mausoleums. I would imagine that the cemetery office would have knowledge and access to this information. I have uploaded many images of mausoleums to Wikipedia, and this is the first time that I've ever had a request for a date of construction. I am fairly certain that the Wilson mausoleum predates 1990. Anthony22 (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would assume it must be close to his death. I thought you might know a date. No problem, we'll just say 1972. And you may well get asked for more in future as all free images are being moved off of en-Wiki, hopefully by the end of 2013 - and commons will need to know the date of modern 3D artwork constructions.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oriental Dragon 2012C.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Goldstar Mothers Statue 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:48, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Celtic Cross Kensico Cemetery February 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the File as there is a duplicate on commons - File:Frieze on Outer Wall of Queen of Peace Mausoleum 2006.JPG - we don't keep duplicates of commons files. It would have been deleted soon anyway, as all free files now end up in commons - either you can put them there or someone will soon move it there.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sculpture of George Washington in Kensico Cemetery February 2012.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:58, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Treestone With Anchor, Kensico Cemetery February 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 01:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Patricia Mary Quinton Child Monument February 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Erotic Lovers April 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:14, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Benjamin T. Babbitt Headstone 2009.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Dutchess County Fair at Rhinebeck, NY, August 2012.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:31, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hyde Park Statues of Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt August 21, 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Powers ^T 01:15, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gold Star Mothers Memorial Getty Square 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:30, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruby Goldstein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that we cannot link to videos on YouTube which are copyright violations. It is up to you to show that the video was uploaded by or with permission of the copyright holder. Yworo (talk) 21:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Porter: "a person employed to carry luggage and other loads"[5]. However, "bearers" is fine, especially if it's used in the film. I just didn't like them being called "girls". Clarityfiend (talk) 23:10, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John Wooden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Game of the Century

Yvette Vickers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to William Hudson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Richard Alexander (actor) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Babes in Toyland

Richard Tucker (actor) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Forest Lawn Memorial Park

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irwin Dambrot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Howard Taft High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]