→Otranto Raid: new section |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Yes I would agree, I did not realize the Command of the Oceans 1914-1915 box was specifically for battles of the German Asiatic fleet. I was thinking the campaign box was for naval battles fought in the Pacific and Indian Oceans by any Central or Entente navy's. Since the battle off the Falklands is an Atlantic event, I moved it to the recently created Atlantic 1914-1918 campaign box. I thought it was kind of wierd seeing the Battle of the Falkland Islands in both the Atlantic and Command of the Oceans campaign boxes. To put it simply, its not my way of organizing and I am very content when it comes to a consistant organized system, a standard protocol if you will. Now that you have explained yours it makes sense. I see your reasoning and agree therefore I will not change it back, sorry for the mix up.--[[User:Aj4444|Aj4444]] ([[User talk:Aj4444#top|talk]]) 22:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC) :>) |
Yes I would agree, I did not realize the Command of the Oceans 1914-1915 box was specifically for battles of the German Asiatic fleet. I was thinking the campaign box was for naval battles fought in the Pacific and Indian Oceans by any Central or Entente navy's. Since the battle off the Falklands is an Atlantic event, I moved it to the recently created Atlantic 1914-1918 campaign box. I thought it was kind of wierd seeing the Battle of the Falkland Islands in both the Atlantic and Command of the Oceans campaign boxes. To put it simply, its not my way of organizing and I am very content when it comes to a consistant organized system, a standard protocol if you will. Now that you have explained yours it makes sense. I see your reasoning and agree therefore I will not change it back, sorry for the mix up.--[[User:Aj4444|Aj4444]] ([[User talk:Aj4444#top|talk]]) 22:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC) :>) |
||
== [[Otranto Raid]] == |
|||
Hello, Aj4444. Do we really need this article? It just duplicates the content that's already at [[Battle of the Strait of Otranto (1917)]]. The battle article isn't long enough to warrant a subarticle, and the article you created doesn't add anything new. I think it'd be best to just redirect the article you created to the battle article. [[User:Parsecboy|Parsecboy]] ([[User talk:Parsecboy|talk]]) 12:02, 26 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:10, 26 July 2009
--Aj4444 (talk) 21:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)== Welcome! ==
Hi Aj4444! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
hi Talk to Magibon 01:56, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Battle of Trindade has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): geocities\.com (links: http://ca.geocities.com/volturno@rogers.com/volturno61.html). It appears that you inserted an e-mail address to Battle of Trindade. Wikipedia pages should not contain personal information. For more information, please read Wikipedia:Biography of Living People, specifically the section about personal information.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Command of The Oceans
You have stated that the Battle of the Falkland Islands article cannot belong in two campaign boxes, yet there are dozens of articles in wikipedia in multiple campaign boxes. The Command of the Oceans box contains the battles fought by the German East Asian Squardron and by that reasoning the battle of the falkland islands would belong in that box as well, would you not agree? XavierGreen (talk) 21:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes I would agree, I did not realize the Command of the Oceans 1914-1915 box was specifically for battles of the German Asiatic fleet. I was thinking the campaign box was for naval battles fought in the Pacific and Indian Oceans by any Central or Entente navy's. Since the battle off the Falklands is an Atlantic event, I moved it to the recently created Atlantic 1914-1918 campaign box. I thought it was kind of wierd seeing the Battle of the Falkland Islands in both the Atlantic and Command of the Oceans campaign boxes. To put it simply, its not my way of organizing and I am very content when it comes to a consistant organized system, a standard protocol if you will. Now that you have explained yours it makes sense. I see your reasoning and agree therefore I will not change it back, sorry for the mix up.--Aj4444 (talk) 22:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC) :>)