Hi Abrvagl! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Jr8825 • Talk 17:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I really need to communicate with you from e mail, could you send your gmail? 78.190.1.110 (talk) 18:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sorry, I do not want to share my personal details on Wikipedia, especially with anonyms IP user, whom I do not know. Please use talk page or WP:EMAIL Abrvagl (talk) 20:43, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. Thank you. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 10:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• This has now concluded. You are formally warned that further instances of edit warring, including slow motion edit warring, will result in sanctions. Thryduulf (talk) 14:38, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks for notifying me and sorry for late reply (I had an emergency surgery and was not able to reply). I respect the judgment of the administrators and will accept the warning. However, I never intended to edit a war. I just having difficult time while being ignored, like here [1].

  Another example is 2020 Ghazanchetsots Cathedral shelling, where I made an good faith edit[[2]], which was reverted saying that if Saadats nationality is Azerbaijani, then her response is related to official Azerbaijan[3]. Although I proved that edit was justified and agreed helping to raise RfC for other proposals, other user did not self-revert, saying that stable version of article shall be keep until RfC. This does not make sense to me, how the valid edit linked to the RfC?

  If there such Wikipedia policy, that article shall not be edited at all until there is RfC, then why other used added two low quality sources to the article? One of which is Russian search engine result[4], which refers to non-existing online publication Kdpconsulting.ru (when you click it it opens some unknown https://runews.biz/). The second one[5] is also unknown news paper agency(or personal blog), which wrongly calls Saadat as male and focus on her nationality calling her Azerbaijani journalist, where in reality she is working for TASS and holds Russia citizenship In the same vein, Azerbaijani journalist Saadat Kadyrova revealed to the Russian TV audience that the church bombing was justified. He compared the residents to terrorists.

  I will also ping Rosguill, gents can you please advice what is the best way to act in such situations? Thanks in advance! Abrvagl (talk) 06:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. Thank you. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 13:16, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]