• If I leave a message on your talk page, please respond there, not here. Leaving a {{talkback}} notice is allowed on my talk page.
• If you leave a message here, I will always respond here. Do not leave a {{talkback}} message here.
• Do not use personal attacks! That is strictly forbidden!

(Remember WP:NPA and WP:LEGAL) 7107Lecker ^{Tischgespräch, außerdem...} 03:34, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Please can I ask you to change your old user page to remove the accusation that I continue to "delete my efforts in helping Wikipedia out, and has made it clear than I am unfit to use this user". This is completely untrue. I have removed a couple of your edits on my talk page, and have explained the reasons why on your old talk page. I have never stated that you are or ever have been an unfit to use your user. If you think I have, please show me where, and give me the opportunity to put explain what I meant, as this was never my stance. As far as changing user name, you approached me asking how to go about it.

Thank you. Stephen! ^Coming... 16:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As you have not been online for the last day or so, I have taken the liberty of removing your personal attack against me and User:Mikhailov Kusserow. I would ask you please to review the Wiki policy of no personal attacks. If you have an issue with me, please come to me directly; I will be more than happy to discuss things with you. Or if you feel that you cannot, then bring it up at the admin's notice board where you will receive advice from impartial sources. Please be aware that personal attacks can result in blocks. Stephen! ^Coming... 12:01, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for removing that accusation I made using the old user, but I am still holding a "grudge" against Mikhailov Kusserow. You see, he's warning me for committing to vandalism, while in real life, I have never vandalized Wikipedia under the name "RuleOfThe9th". In that case, you should contact the anon-editor and discuss this incident. Thank you.--7107delicious (talk) 12:01, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a look at the interaction between the two of you, and my suggestion is this: Let it go. Yes, he may have given an inappropriate warning to you, but if you are going to expect an apology, I think you will be disappointed. The thing that he was objecting to (and yes, a non-templated note would have been helpful) is your answering on behalf of others on their talk pages ([1], [2]). You raised this at ANI, and it did highlight some odd edits of this user. However, archiving or deleting notices from talk pages is not to be taken personally. What people do on their talk pages is up to them - provided it isn't a personal attack, BLP violation or spam.

I know you have an ambition to become an admin, and that is a fine goal to aim for. But you need to stop letting every little thing get to you about what others get up to. Should you file another RFA, people will look back over ALL your edits (both with this account and also with your older account). What they will be looking for is signs that you can keep your cool in a crisis. Yes, your older edits won't help, but if they see an improvement in how you handle situations, and don't let things get to you, then you may well succeed.

If you want to see examples of original research, POV, COI violations, you only need to look at some of my earlier edits! So don't worry about your past mistakes - just let it go. Also, don't dwell on other users' past mistakes against you, as that WILL be held against you. Here are a few things that are liable to happen to you should you get the mop: you'll be insulted; people will vandalise your page like nothing else; other people's problems will somehow become your fault; people might try and impersonate you and give the appearance of a vandal; you'll get newbies asking the same questions over and over again; people will accuse you of racism/anti-semitism/other hate crimes, all because you deleted an advert.

This is why it is important not to dwell on the past - should you be given admin powers, you will have the potential to block users. Administrators are needed to keep their cool no matter what is thrown at them. Put yourself in my shoes now... had I written something about you, accusing you of saying that I was not good for the project, or something like that. How would you have reacted? How would you have reacted if you had the power to block me? Would I now be indefinitely blocked? Or would I be reading a message asking me to withdraw the comment and justify my position?

So, to cut a long story short (whaddaya mean too late?), forget about Mikhailov Kusseraw and remove any comments from your userpage that indicate that you are even bothered by it. And next time you post on someone elses talk page, make sure that you are talking to the user, and not replying on that user's behalf - they might not like it!

By the way, you mention on your current user page that you had "controversies with an administrator". As Mikhailov is not an administrator, I can only assume you mean me. I'm not sure what point you are trying to make, but comments like that won't help people look favourably on you as a user. They may jump to the (incorrect) conclusion that you were a vandal, or engaged in edit wars, possibly reported for incivility, or many other things. I'm not saying admins are always right, but on the whole they are a trusted bunch of editors. As a result, people might decide without looking into matters that you are automatically in the wrong. I suspect that this is not the message about yourself you wish to put across.

I'm not saying I handled the situation between the two of us correctly, but I did what I thought was right at the time, and under the same circumstances, I might even do the same again (although I might word things differently). If there was anything that I said to you that you did not like, then I would rather you say so - being an admin is a learning process, and I appreciate that I will make mistakes. However, it is only by being told what I did was wrong, or how others might have handled things differently, will I hope to learn. And don't worry about offending me - as an admin, my skin is naturally thick.

If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to say. Stephen! ^Coming... 16:43, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If someone had given me the mop, and that he/she considers me liable to use the mop correctly, I would warn you four times, before reviewing the disruptive contributions and blocking you. You see, everything begins with a simple subject (in Wikipedia, it starts with a general warning.) {{Uw-vandalism1)) is a simple example of these kinds. Should you have any inquiries regarding the incident, I will contact you ASAP, or drop me a message in my talk page.--7107delicious (talk) 13:07, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And what do you refer as "skin"?7107delicious (talk) 13:09, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thick skinned - the ability to withstand criticism. Stephen! ^Coming... 13:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The link is dead - is this a Wikipedia page? Tell me where the original page is. It's a dead link, there, Stephen. Can I call you Steve?--7107delicious (talk) 14:13, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thick skin - my bad. As for my name, please call me Stephen - I'm not keen on being called Steve, but thank you for asking. So many people just assume that Steve is fine.

About the warnings you mentioned you would use, you spoke about using templated warnings. You do need to be careful as to what warnings you use. Vandalism warnings are fine for vandalism, but shouldn't be used with (for example) personal attacks. If you have a look at WP:MLT and WP:UTN there are a whole host of useful warning templates to use.

Before you go ahead and use them, you do need to think about when to use them. When someone used one on you, you were more than a bit put out. Have a read of this essay: WP:DTTR - I suspect a lot of the problem would have been sorted before it even became a problem had you received a note of explanation rather than a templated warning. Also, read the edits/deletions made by the suspected vandal - is it really vandalism? Have a look at what is not vandalism.

There are a number of essays linked on that WP:DTTR page, all of which (whilst not actually Wikipedia policy) are very good practices. If you do your best to follow these practices, then you will find editing wikipedia a lot less stressful, and a whole lot more enjoyable. And if you are ever in doubt as to what someone's motives are? assume good faith! Stephen! ^Coming... 16:06, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!--7107delicious (talk) 11:22, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Deleted all the info you told me to remove.

BTW, the name of the anon editor I told you was Kusserow, not Kusseraw.--Berlin Approach | Lufthansa 533 at FLT230 11:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I need some administrators like YOU to change the registry of the IP address, in which in reality is registered as HIGH SCOPE INDONESIA. I am worried that the IP used was also blocked on the English WP. I can assume you that this registry is incorrect and must be change.--Berlin Approach | Lufthansa 533 at FLT230 10:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May I suggest that this is something which you should take to WP:AN/I? --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 19:16, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saya adalah seorang yang berstatus berkebangsaan Indonesia, dan saya memang secara fisik berpenampilan seperti bangsa perantau dari negeri tirai bambu yang pada umumnya berkehidupan maju di negeri jiran.

Saya merasa kecewa juga dengan beberapa aksi yang terlalu menyalahkan bangsa Malaysia. Saya merasa bahwa negara-negara yang seperti Jepang, Cina, India, dan beberapa negara lainnya yang lebih jauh maju dari Indonesia juga banyak yang dijiplak bangsa kita yang mulai agresif ke arah "adu domba" bagi bangsa yang awam.

Terima kasih atas pesannya, salam.

Relly Komaruzaman Talk 19:52, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Betul sekali, kebetulan juga saya merasa bahwa tindakan yang diambil para pengguna www.malingsia.com itu sesuatu yang dilebih-lebihkan. Terima kasih atas komentarnya.--Berlin Approach | Lufthansa 533 at FLT230 09:13, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Secara pribadi, saya merasa tidak diperlakukan secara manusiawi oleh suatu etnis tertentu. Jujur saja, saya tidak ambil peduli dengan manusia yang telah memperlakukan saya seperti manusia rendahan sejak usia dini hingga hari ini. Perlakuan yang tidak menyenangkan menjadi trauma abadi di pikiran saya. Kesimpulannya adalah I don't care about the disaster.

Ucapan dari kejujuran. Relly Komaruzaman Talk 07:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Etnis apakah yang memperlaukukan Anda secara tidak manusiawi?--Berlin Approach | Lufthansa 533 at FLT230 10:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tanyakan juga pengguna lainnya di Wikipedia, apakah mereka peduli akan musibah tersebut?--Berlin Approach | Lufthansa 533 at FLT230 10:27, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 7107delicious. You have new messages at StephenBuxton's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, 7107delicious. You have new messages at StephenBuxton's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock #1619253 lifted or expired. Request handled by: עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:07, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply] Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Thanks for signing my GuestBook! December21st2012Freak http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:December21st2012Freak/Guest_Book 19:37, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

If you're going to use the warning sandbox, please clean it out. Especially if you use warnings that add categories, like username concern, or indefinite blocks. Thank you!--Unionhawk ^{Talk E-mail Review} 11:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip, but how would I do so?--Berlin Approach | Lufthansa 533 at FLT230 16:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Despite my best efforts to read your edit as carefully as possible, I did not realize what the purpose of the page was. The edit has been reverted and I have removed the warning message. Please excuse my error and accept my apologies. Alansohn (talk) 16:03, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I accept your apology. Just remember to be more accurate next time. Cheers, --Berlin Approach | Lufthansa 533 at FLT230 16:07, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

for signing my user page, here is a barn star.

The Orangesodakid Guestbook Page Barnstar

---

This user has signed orangesodakid's signature page.

regards--Orangesodakid 15:54, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! My second barnstar after December21st2012Freak's guestbook signature. I was forced to bring it myself back to my talk page:).--Berlin Approach | Lufthansa 533 at FLT230 15:59, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's going to matter with regards to the username warning you gave that user. Anyways, I was going to ignore Architect's benign threat/tirade on Jimbo's talk page, but after his following two edits I could not as his intent was clear. Anyways, thanks for your concern. MuZemike 01:40, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look lively and closely. That username is very close to constituting a company name.--Berlin Approach | Lufthansa 533 at FLT230 01:42, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, indeed it was unclear, and is written like a public complaining.--Berlin Approach | Lufthansa 533 at FLT230 03:35, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is, --One moment, Reciever | Thank you for your instructions. 03:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't ever give out private info, like a name, as you just did on Jimbo's talk page. It's been suppressed. See WP:OS. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So I suggested it at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:7107delicious_-_seeking_attention. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 12:10, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]