Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Michael Warren | Talk 21:12, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Luchesi authorship controversy. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. Baseball,Baby! ^{balls•strikes} 21:57, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to 40 (number). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Imaninjapirate^{talk to me} 23:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from User talk:Omeomi. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Random ^{Say it here!} 22:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Influenza, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Haemo 00:17, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Touchdown, you will be blocked from editing. Avant Guard 17:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your revision to this page, revision 174927830, with the edit summary "not nonsensical he's right- opinions dont matter- ban Pink" was not constructive and has been reverted. Your revision cites previous reversions of edits made with the nonsensical and unsupported summaries of "rv due to wrongness," "LAPD does not carry this as an opem (sic) homicide case because girl was not murdered," and "rv SOURCED irrelevant opinion by obsessed fan." None of these are legitimate or logical reasonings for changing material that is sourced and cited. If you have difficulty understanding these concepts, please see WP:NPOV, WP:CITE, WP:VERIFY and WP:RELY. They outline Wikipedia policy regarding citations, what defines a reliable source and verifiability. Posting material from established reliable sources is part and parcel of a WP article. The death of Karyn Kupcinet was ruled a homicide by coroner's investigation and was investigated by legal authorities as the same. It is unsolved and open. Adding material to this article which explains theories of her death which are published elsewhere does not constitute opinions by an obsessed fan.

The edit summaries that were reverted, further, constituted a personal attack upon another editor, as does your edit summary and your contribution to the article's talk page. Your comments on the talk page violate Wikipedia policies regarding civility, ettiquette, and no personal attacks. You make unfounded accusations that the editor in question only edits this page, which is factually inaccurate. You also make unfounded accusations that the editor "drove...away" users ColScott, Isotope22, and Dooyar. ColScott is an account that is banned indefinitely for issues unrelated to this page and in fact, made no contributions to this article. There is no user with the name Isotope22, however there is an administrator with a similar name, although that person has made no contributions to this page, according to the page's history. The user Dooyar still makes contributions to this page. Please desist from making personal attacks, idle threats of having other editors banned and vulgarity or you may be blocked from editing. Wildhartlivie 23:57, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Talk:Karyn Kupcinet, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Your disruptive edits and personal attacks will no longer be tolerated. Please refrain from making disruptive edits. Diff. Rjd0060 00:30, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edit to Lucky225 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 18:08, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does it suck to know that even strangers think you are a dried up old shrew? 66.77.102.10 (talk) 02:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It does, but the knowledge that there are big men like you out there, willing to insult people they don't know over an anonymous medium, always gives me heart. Thanks for being there, ~ Riana ⁂ 02:25, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wait a minute- if it sucks that you know you are a dried up old shrew tell me again how it is a insult? You are what you are and you live with it. We will always be here to remind you.HydeDoctor (talk) 17:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]