Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
203.129.23.146 (talk)
203.129.23.146 (talk)
Line 31: Line 31:
:Your personal attacks on others seem to speak for themselves. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:203.129.23.146&oldid=434557309 One of the former versions of this page] gives the flavor of the issues. You stated there, 'I don't really give a rats about making Wikipedia better any more.' Since that is your position, it's unclear why we should be going out of our way to assist you. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 03:16, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
:Your personal attacks on others seem to speak for themselves. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:203.129.23.146&oldid=434557309 One of the former versions of this page] gives the flavor of the issues. You stated there, 'I don't really give a rats about making Wikipedia better any more.' Since that is your position, it's unclear why we should be going out of our way to assist you. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 03:16, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
::And if you continue this ''while'' you are blocked, you won't be able to edit this talk page either in addition to a possible block extension. As for "bureaucracy", [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia isn't one]] and please [[WP:POINT|do ''not'' disrupt Wikipedia to make a point]].[[User:Jasper Deng|Jasper Deng]] [[User talk:Jasper Deng|(talk)]] 03:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
::And if you continue this ''while'' you are blocked, you won't be able to edit this talk page either in addition to a possible block extension. As for "bureaucracy", [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia isn't one]] and please [[WP:POINT|do ''not'' disrupt Wikipedia to make a point]].[[User:Jasper Deng|Jasper Deng]] [[User talk:Jasper Deng|(talk)]] 03:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
::: Your threats are empty. 'I don't really give a rats about making Wikipedia better any more.' is pretty tame on the scale of Wikipedia comments. It was also a response to incivility towards me by another "experienced" user. I also don't expect assistance. I expect bureaucratic nonsense, which is exactly what I'm getting. It's just funny how freely it flows here.
::: Your threats are empty. 'I don't really give a rats about making Wikipedia better any more.' is pretty tame on the scale of Wikipedia comments. It was also a response to incivility towards me by another "experienced" user. I also don't expect assistance (you still haven't justified the block). I expect bureaucratic nonsense, which is exactly what I'm getting. It's just funny how freely it flows here. I'm not disrupting Wikipedia, I'm just pissing off a select few administrators who are willing to abuse their privelidges to violate the very same policy they preach (make a point).

Revision as of 03:45, 9 October 2011

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:51, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:43, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for Talk page disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SpinningSpark 08:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Thanks for making my point SpinningShark. It's unfortunate that Wikipedia must suffer the "experienced editor".

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:29, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:03, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 203.129.23.146. You have new messages at Gerardw's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Personal attacks

Please do not call other editors "shills" or make any other personal attacks, regardless of viewpoint, as you did here and here, and please assume that the other editors are acting in good faith. Thank you.Jasper Deng (talk) 22:53, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "assume that the other editors are acting in good faith". Speak for yourself shill. The whole talk page you refer to is a warzone lacking any level of faith. Go on, have me blocked. It won't change anything. You're a shill and a gamer WP:GAME.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:20, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of Two Weeks for Disruptive Editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY (TALK) 03:05, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please clarify your reasoning behind this block? What Wikipedia policies have I expressly violated that warrant a block? What pages have I edited that warrant a block? I'm assuming the block is in relation to the Windows versus Linux comparison article talk page. Have you read that page? It is full of Wikipedia policy violations by everyone involved (hence why at one point I proposed the article for deletion). Did you just block me because Jasper Deng asked you to (because he thinks I'm "attacking" him)? You cite "disruptive editing" but on that policy I can't see anything related to what I've done, especially since I haven't really edited any articles. My contribution to Wikipedia has been so far focused on talk pages. I'm not requesting to be unblocked. It doesn't bother me in the slightest and will not change my attitude or behaviour in any way. I'm testing the bureaucracy, but I believe that I've been unfairly blocked and that further explanation is warranted.
Your personal attacks on others seem to speak for themselves. One of the former versions of this page gives the flavor of the issues. You stated there, 'I don't really give a rats about making Wikipedia better any more.' Since that is your position, it's unclear why we should be going out of our way to assist you. EdJohnston (talk) 03:16, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And if you continue this while you are blocked, you won't be able to edit this talk page either in addition to a possible block extension. As for "bureaucracy", Wikipedia isn't one and please do not disrupt Wikipedia to make a point.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your threats are empty. 'I don't really give a rats about making Wikipedia better any more.' is pretty tame on the scale of Wikipedia comments. It was also a response to incivility towards me by another "experienced" user. I also don't expect assistance (you still haven't justified the block). I expect bureaucratic nonsense, which is exactly what I'm getting. It's just funny how freely it flows here. I'm not disrupting Wikipedia, I'm just pissing off a select few administrators who are willing to abuse their privelidges to violate the very same policy they preach (make a point).

Leave a Reply