Welcome 14Jenna7Caesura!

Thank you.--14Jenna7Caesura (talk) 21:09, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Terrence Deyalsingh. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 9#Terrence Deyalsingh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sharon Gay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 22:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Venom: Let There Be Carnage. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. $chnauzer 23:16, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The transcript is like IMBD.--14Jenna7Caesura (talk) 23:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Saturday Night Live (season 47), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Identifying notable people who appear in a sketch is notable (and common). But we don't identify every sketch; or if so notability needs a reliable source or consensus. Sundayclose (talk) 19:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are biased because you think the Squid Game mention is more important than Jon Gruden. Okay. I let you keep your edit. I see that you have strong feeling about the SNL 47 page. That is okay with me. Have a good day!--14Jenna7Caesura (talk) 19:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your mind reading failed in this case. I've never seen Squid Game and know almost nothing about it (nor do I know much about Jon Gruden). This is not about Squid Game or Gruden; it's about standard practice that is the WP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS on SNL articles. And by the way, you don't let editors keep an edit, nor does any editor. A disputed edit is determined by policy or consensus. You also have a good day. Sundayclose (talk) 22:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Fiasco (TV series). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. PamD 14:12, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CaffeinAddict. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The Closer (2021 film) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CaffeinAddict (talk) 03:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fiasco (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability: sourced only to programme website and unreliable Imdb

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 13:26, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, When you create an article like Fiasco (TV series) with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Fiasco ), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one, adding it to the disambiguation page. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 14:14, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly.--14Jenna7Caesura (talk) 14:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Freedom to Vote Act, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 04:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sexuality of Adolf Hitler, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Rusalkii (talk) 05:15, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 14Jenna7Caesura

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dan arndt, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Lawrence Washington (1565–1616), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dan arndt}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dan arndt (talk) 23:40, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 14Jenna7Caesura. You have new messages at Talk:Fareed Zakaria GPS.
Message added 01:25, 27 November 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Shearonink (talk) 01:25, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Here's how to add references from reliable sources for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain the Wikipedia policy of verifiability.

Adding well formatted references is actually quite easy:

1. While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "Cite". Click on it.
2. Then click on "Templates".
3. Choose the most appropriate template and fill in as many details as you can. This will add a well formatted reference that is helpful in case the web URL (or "website link") becomes inactive in the future.
4. Click on Preview when you're done filling out the 'Cite (web/news/book/journal)' to make sure that the reference is correct.
5. Click on Insert to insert the reference into your editing window content.
6. Click on Show preview to Preview all your editing changes.

• Before clicking on Publish changes, check that a References header   ==References==   is near the end of the article.
• And check that   {{Reflist}}    is directly underneath that header.

7.  Click on Publish changes. ...and you've just added a complete reference to a Wikipedia article.

You can read more about this on Help:Edit toolbar or see this video File:RefTools.ogv.
Hope this helps, --Shearonink (talk) 02:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• To use this message, place {{subst:User:Shearonink/ref}} on User:talk pages when needed.

I just learn about the "Templates" drop-down menu from you. Thanks.--14Jenna7Caesura (talk) 03:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Crossroads ^-talk- 06:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]