Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Boeing-Saab T-7 Red Hawk. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. -Fnlayson (talk) 00:54, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

your opinion has been registered invalid

congratulations 1234567890Bobdob (talk) 01:10, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Boeing-Saab T-7 Red Hawk shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly (talk) 01:10, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Boeing-Saab T-7 Red Hawk. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. BilCat (talk) 01:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

contiuning to talk to me without permission will result in immediate banning 1234567890Bobdob (talk) 01:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Fnlayson. BilCat (talk) 01:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

wow i dont care 1234567890Bobdob (talk) 01:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Firefangledfeathers. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Alexandria City High School. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wikipelli ^Talk 22:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.acps.k12.va.us/Page/2481 It’s almost as though I know what I’m talking about and you don’t 1234567890Bobdob (talk) 22:53, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dont care

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]