Hello, பெரும்பாண்டியன்2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Battle of Mullaitivu (1996) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Obi2canibe (talk) 14:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1990 massacre of Sri Lankan Police officers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rebel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Weli Oya (1995). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

- UmdP 06:33, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@UMDP: பெரும்பாண்டியன்2's edits on Battle of Weli Oya (1995) can not be described as disruptive. You may not agree with their contributions but that does mean they are disruptive or warrant a warning.--Obi2canibe (talk) 16:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He has been continuously making unsourced edits and reinserting them when reverted and has also added/edited numbers multiple times in many pages 1 2 and also targeting editors ethnicity instead of seeking dispute resolution. Because the behavior has repeated I believe a warning is warranted. - UmdP 16:37, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@UMDP: I don't need your warning and you look at your faking behaviour. As you are Sinhalese, you are supporting the government propaganda and using Wikipedia pages for your propaganda works. I don't your warning. I make a humble request Obi2canibe to delete that warning, as I have not done anything wrong against the Wiki's guidelines. I respect the guidelines of Wikis.

       Also, I request @Obi2canibe to allow me to write on that article. These Sinhalese are writing their side of view and not allowing Tamils to write their views in any Sri Lankan battles articles. Please take a look at that article(Battle of Weli Oya (1995)). None of the article's details doesn't cite any sources (The one cited is a blank citation) and they are written in a way that can distort the history. Those details written in that article are cooked-up stories. I have the full report of that battle in Tamil. It's a well-documented battle as that was the first of the Tamil Commandos battle.