Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Could you please explain why you are removing the word "Jerusalem" as the proclaimed capital of the State of Palestine from that article? nableezy - 14:50, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RolandR. Your recent edit to the page Israeli settler violence appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You should never, under any circumstances, alter a direct quotation, or the title of a work cited, even if this better suits your point of view. RolandR (talk) 01:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. While you have been here more than 30 days, you only have 41 edits so you are not yet allowed to edit WP:ARBPIA articles. Please follow the rules. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:39, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 15:04, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston So what does it actually means? I'm not allowed to edit Articles related to the Arab-Israeli conflict at all? is it temporary? ברעזרא (talk) 01:11, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you have only 53 Wikipedia edits. That means you will have to wait until you have made 500 edits before you touch anything which has to do with the Arab-Israeli conflict. This restriction applies to all new editors, not just you. EdJohnston (talk) 02:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you EdJohnston. ברעזרא (talk) 02:29, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:38, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Snuggums why did you reverted my edit? it is true, you can check it over here. בר (talk) 20:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New York Post isn't a good source to use, and even if it was, that piece doesn't indicate she officially adopted it as part of her legal identity. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:48, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, בר. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michal Nagen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 13:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn there is a reference now. Problem solved? Bar (talk) 19:50, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It could do with some more, but that should happen over time. Thanks for your hard work, Boleyn (talk) 20:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, בר. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, בר. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mad Decent logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

בר שלום, תגיד מה נסגר אתך, אברהם הוא אבי האומה הישראלית? ומדוע לא ישראל? ובכלל אנחנו מכונים 'יהודים', מדוע אבי האומה אינו יהודה בן ישראל? השקעתי וערכתי הסבר רלבנטי הרבה יותר, לאומיות היא מושג מודרני, ובמקרה הישראלי-ציוני יש אב אומה מובהק כל כך, חבל להחמיץ זאת. Dovole (talk) 18:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dovole אכן שאלה טובה האם מדובר באברהם או יעקב. למיטב ידעתי אנחנו העם היחיד שיש לו שלושה אבות, אבל אף אחד מהם איננו הרצל. הרצל הוא חוזה המדינה, לא אבי האומה. דוד בן גוריון ודאי מתהפך בקברו למשמע מחקר מקורי מסוג זה. Bar (talk) 19:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

מחקר מקורי? אתה אמיתי? על איזו אומה אתה מדבר ה"אומה היהודית" (שוב לא נוסדה לא על ידי אברהם ואפילו לא על ידי ישראל, גיבורי הם יהודים , יהודאים, כמו בית דוד)- ולא, אין מדובר במחקר מקורי- ההבחנה בין ישראל ויהודה היא הבחנה הקיימת בתעודות אשוריות ועבור עד ימי הפרובינקיה יהודה). האומה הישראלית,

תרצה "אומה בהתהוות" מקובל שנוסדה על ידי חוזה המדינה החילונית, זה שאותו בן גוריון היה בין הדואגים שתמונתו תופיע במליאת הכנסת, תמונה שנחה אף על שידתו של צבי הכהן קוק.

Dovole (talk) 15:37, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dovole בכל פעם שחיפשתי את "אבי האומה הישראלית" או "אבי האומה היהודית" קיבלתי תוצאות הנוגעות לאברהם אבינו. אף פעם לא הרצל. זה לא נראה לך מוזר? אם הטענה שלך איננה מחקר מקורי, אנא הבא מקורות מהימנים לפיהם הרצל הוא אבי האומה שלנו. Bar (talk) 15:56, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

הב נא המקורות שאברהם הוא אבי האומה הישראלית.Dovole (talk) 15:58, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dovole אני חושב שזה ברור מהתואר המצורף לשמו: אברהם אבינו. אני מוכן לקבל את השגותייך כלפי אברהם, אבל אינני מוכן לקבל את הטענה שהרצל הוא אבי האומה. לכך נדרש סימוכין. Bar (talk) 16:13, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

בר, המעשה שלך פסול, אתה טוען שהטיעון שלי הוא בגדר מחקר מקורי ונתלה בתפישה המסורתית ובכינוי "אבינו" בלבד?! אני מבקש ממך לחפש טענות למקורות שלך, כי לאלה שלי יש, ומי שלמד היסטוריה מודרנית מעט יותר מבתיכון (אך גם), יוכל לצטט מקורות רבים בעניין.

בר האם אתה מודע לדיון בשאלת קיומה של אומה ישראלית, כפי שנדונה בבית המשפט העליון בישראל?Dovole (talk) 17:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dovole, כלל לא פסול, הלא כתבתי זה מכבר שאני מוכן לקבל את השגותייך כלפי אברהם בהקשר זה. לפיכך, כל שנותר הוא לבקש בפעם השלישית מקורות לטענותייך. Bar (talk) 18:11, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

. פסול גם פסול, לבקש מקור לאחר שלא רק שהחלפת לטענה שגויה, גם לא טרחת לספק לה שום מקור, מופרך ככל שיהיה, מסתמך על ההיקש "אבינו"

בר אני לא עובד בלספק לך מקורות, לכשאתפנה למצוא מקור ראוי, אני אוסיף אותו, עד אז אתה מוזמן להסתפק בחיפושי גוגל פשוטים על מיסדי ישראל, אפילו בערכים כאן בויקיפדיה האנגלית.

לא לשווא שאלתי האם אתה מכיר את פסיקת בית המשפט העליון בשאלת קיומו של "לאום ישראלי", האם אתה מכיר אותה?Dovole (talk) 18:25, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dovole אתה מלין על כך שלא הוספתי מקור אך במקביל טוען "אני לא עובד בלספק לך מקורות". זו צביעות. אי אפשר לקחת את טענותייך ברצינות, אם לא תבסס אותן. זאת אמורה להיות עובדה בסיסית, מה כל כך קשה להמציא לכך מקור? כפי שהסברתי, חיפוש אחר המונחים "אבי האומה הישראלית" או "אבי האומה היהודית" מביאות לתוצאות הנוגעות לאברהם אבינו. האם זה מספיק? כבר אמרתי בעצמי שלא. אבל, אין כלל תוצאות המייחסות זאת להרצל, וזאת עובדה כבדת משקל. בנוגע לפסיקה, אני מודע לקיומה אך מעולם לא העמקתי בה. Bar (talk) 19:02, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

אני לא כתבתי שאני לא אספק מקור, אלא שאספק אחד כשאתפנה לעניין (והעניין של "העובד אצלך" מכוון שבקשת המקור שלך קנטרנית).

אל תיקח הטענות שלי ברצינות, יש לך איך לתרום לערך, צא ולמד ספרי הלימוד, מהי אומה, ומהו "חוזה המדינה", מדובר במוסכמות לא פחות מבוססות מ"אברהם אבינו".

המקורות שאתה כנראה מוצא הם דתיים, ולא חסרים כאלה, אתה כנראה אינך מוכן להכיר בכך ש"ישראל" היא "מדינת ישראל" ולא "בני ישראל" מהמעשיות המקראיות.19:49, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Dovole אני מצטער, בקשת מקור איננה קטרנית. ודאי שלא למידע בסיסי שכזה. הרי יש אינספור מקורות לכך שאטאטורק הוא אבי האומה הטורקית. העובדה שאתה מתקשה לספק מקור לטענה שלך כנראה מעידה על טיבה. Bar (talk) 20:27, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

בר אני מצטער, אך לדיון עמך אין תועלת (אינך יכול להשיב באשר לפסיקת העליון כדי שיהיה לנו איזה בסיס משותף לדיון), וזה כאשר מדברים עמך בשפת אמך, אני מניח לך להתבשם "במקורות" שלך שגויים ככל שיהיו.

Dovole זה פשוט: כשיש מחלוקת על מידע, ולא על דעה, ניגשים למקור ובודקים אותו. אם אפילו אין מקור, אין על מה לדון בכלל. Bar (talk) 20:35, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

בעבור קוראי עברית מדובר במידע ברמה של ספרי לימוד, תיקנתי השגיאה בערך, תוך הסבר מפורט, לא התפנתי למצוא מקור ראוי, הגם שיש כאלה המונים כאמור, והדרישה שלך כזה היא לא רק קינטור אלא מזיקה למרחב הערכים, לאחר שהשבת והתעקשת על שגיאה בוטה.Dovole (talk) 21:14, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dovole (talk • contribs) 21:12, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

זה לא נכון. קוראי עברית החליטו להסיר את ישראל מהרשימה בוויקיפדיה העברית. ראוי אם כן, שכך יעשה גם ביתר הוויקיפדיות. אני לא הגבלתי אותך למקורות באנגלית, ולצורך הדיון, גם אם היה מקור בעברית זה היה טוב. אני לא מצאתי כזה. אם יש כאלה "המונים", אינני מבין מה הבעיה להביא לפחות אחד. התבססות על מקורות חציונים ואיכותיים לא רק שאיננה קינטור, אלא תנאי הבסיס לכל ערך בוויקיפדיה. Bar (talk) 21:20, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

אני חושש שאתה טועה ואתה תביא למצב אף פחות רצוי.Dovole (talk) 21:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ram Ben-Barak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue and White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2019–20 Israeli political crisis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 22:21, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As you're removed the again, the issue is now at WP:ANI here. Number 57 08:08, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped versus group image

Sorry, בר, as mentioned in the ANI report, I don't see how you finding the image to be unflattering (which, honestly, I don't really see) can be grounds for it being supplanted with the less relevant group image. Per the policy, you do not actually get special consideration just because you are the creator. In that sense, it's too late, you've already released the image under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. I read both the Hebrew and English talk page discussion regarding the image, and your position is just not adding up, I'm sorry to say. El_C 13:44, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

El_C Please show me where I claimed to own the photo ?? In fact, I argued the exact opposite. I explained my opinion on the talk page. Bar (talk) 13:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bar, fair enough. That was my own assumption and I accept your correction. Sorry about that. I have since commented on the article talk page, so please feel free to respond there. El_C 13:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

El_C He wanted to start a discussion on ANI because he thought he had a majority. While He realized he do not have a majority because he relied on sockpuppet, he sent his complaint anyway. Why are you ignoring it? It is also clear that I do not claim ownership of the picture, - but that is his main claim against me. Why are you ignoring that too? Also the second you declared your support on his side, he switched between the photos. That's how discussions are taking place on English Wikipedia? Bar (talk) 17:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because I'm starting to agree with Cullen that you may have OWN issues pertaining to this after all, despite all your protests to the contrary. And please leave the moving or copying of items from the Administrators' noticeboard to admins. You are not mandated to do so. El_C 22:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Of course this is nonsense, but even if it was true this is no excuse for ignoring the significant problems I mentioned above. However when I wrote these complaints a few hours ago I thought you were an admin so I complained about your hypocrisy. Now I understand that you are a regular user and so it is not your responsibility to be unbiased. Bar (talk) 22:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am an admin and I take an exception to your personal attack. Please don't personally attack other contributors, or you may face sanctions. El_C 22:37, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So you do admin, well it is very disturbing. I find your conduct, in this case, unprofessional and biased. You are not eligible to ignore my complaints against number 57, even if you agree with him about other things. This is not a personal attack but a legitimate criticism that should take your attention. Bar (talk) 22:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. But accusing me of "hypocrisy" is a personal account. Please don't do that again. By the way, Cullen is also an admin. So is Number 57. El_C 23:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So now the motives for this delusional behavior are clear - You're just protecting another admin. In Hebrew Wikipedia, I have not yet encountered an admin who managed an edit war. Especially not one who restores another's edit in the second he got support from another user. You ignored it as you ignored his vain complaint, and all in the name of protecting another admin. Your conduct, as Number 57, is rotten from the ground up. Bar (talk) 00:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.S Philbrick(Talk) 12:36, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Renuar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renuar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 20:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Florence Downes, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 19:49, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited King of Italy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Banna and Arbin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please, add citations on Protests against Benjamin Netanyahu because it does not cite any reliable source. Econdo 25 (talk) 07:49, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Protests against Benjamin Netanyahu, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Captain Calm (talk) 09:10, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've had enough. User:Captain Calm Delete the draft. Bar (talk) 11:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Protests against Benjamin Netanyahu (2020). Thank you. Captain Calm (talk) 11:42, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems boring to you. Please stop making trouble. Bar (talk) 11:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, בר. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Florence Downes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:09, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The destruction of Joseph's Tomb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://slavaguide.com/sites/joseph-s-tomb-history-and-important-events. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 16:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Selfstudier (talk) 18:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At Shireen Abu Akleh, you are in breach of the rule that says you must not revert more than once in 24 hours. Kindly self revert. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 18:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Selfstudier, Are you administrator? ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 18:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. Please self revert as you were asked. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 18:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not your private property. You added * today * controversial content and we have a dispute. Therefore, you need to restore to a stable version, and discuss it on the talk page. You are ignoring this law.

Please, remove this paragraph from Shireen Abu Akleh. Otherwise, I will turn to administrators. ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]