Content deleted Content added
190.236.132.154 (talk) →Compulsory Voting: new section |
Reaper Eternal (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Heya Sig, how ya doin? Missed your RfA, I afraid. :( Give it a few months. You'll be fine, I trust. Don't have much time on WP, but I wanted to say hi. Best, [[User:Nolelover|'''<span style="color:FireBrick;">Nolelover'''</span>]] [[User talk:Nolelover|'''<span style="color:Gold"><sup>Talk</sup>'''</span>]]<sup>·</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Nolelover|'''<span style="color:Gold"><sup>Contribs</sup>'''</span>]] 14:31, 15 October 2012 (UTC) |
Heya Sig, how ya doin? Missed your RfA, I afraid. :( Give it a few months. You'll be fine, I trust. Don't have much time on WP, but I wanted to say hi. Best, [[User:Nolelover|'''<span style="color:FireBrick;">Nolelover'''</span>]] [[User talk:Nolelover|'''<span style="color:Gold"><sup>Talk</sup>'''</span>]]<sup>·</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Nolelover|'''<span style="color:Gold"><sup>Contribs</sup>'''</span>]] 14:31, 15 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Compulsory Voting == |
|||
--[[Special:Contributions/190.236.132.154|190.236.132.154]] ([[User talk:190.236.132.154|talk]]) 18:21, 15 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
You are evil. Please compulsory voting. I stay in certain. |
Revision as of 18:28, 15 October 2012
A barnstar for you!
The Admin's Barnstar | |
First time I give this barnstar and is for you. I don't care what happened at your RFA, you deserve this award and more. Thank you for being part of this big community called Wikipedia. — ΛΧΣ21™ 01:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC) |
Template:X1/sandbox/is not talk
Per the TfD, I have moved Template:X1/sandbox/is not talk to User:Lowercase sigmabot/is not talk, but feel free to move it to another place in userspace. I will delete the redirect in a day or two. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Lonecloud
I have substantially re-worked the text from the source it was taken. I will continue to add to the article other sources. I encourage you to read both sources and to delete the copyright violation. --Hantsheroes (talk) 08:06, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- I did read the sources, spending 15 minutes comparing the article's text with that of the source. As it stands, the article is a copyright violation. And as such, the tag should not be removed until the issue is rectified. →Σσς. (Sigma) 08:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Just dropping by...
Heya Sig, how ya doin? Missed your RfA, I afraid. :( Give it a few months. You'll be fine, I trust. Don't have much time on WP, but I wanted to say hi. Best, Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:31, 15 October 2012 (UTC)