Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Crossmr (talk | contribs)
Civility
Crossmr (talk | contribs)
Line 59: Line 59:


It seems to me that you have acted in an [[WP:CIV|uncivil]] manner on [[:User_talk:Vesther#Re:Final_Take_on_Apprentice_4]]. It is important to keep a cool head, despite any comments against you. [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|Personal attacks]] and [[Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point|disruptive comments]] only escalate a situation; please keep calm and action can be taken against the other parties if necessary. Your involvement in attacking back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors, and lead to general bad feeling. Please try to remain [[Wikipedia:Civility|civil]] with your comments. Thanks! <!-- from Template:Civil1-n --> --[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] 22:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
It seems to me that you have acted in an [[WP:CIV|uncivil]] manner on [[:User_talk:Vesther#Re:Final_Take_on_Apprentice_4]]. It is important to keep a cool head, despite any comments against you. [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|Personal attacks]] and [[Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point|disruptive comments]] only escalate a situation; please keep calm and action can be taken against the other parties if necessary. Your involvement in attacking back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors, and lead to general bad feeling. Please try to remain [[Wikipedia:Civility|civil]] with your comments. Thanks! <!-- from Template:Civil1-n --> --[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] 22:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
:Comments like "useless tralala", "inane tralala" and "Please keep your tralala and useless chit-chat..." are incivil. Please refrain from using them in the future.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] 01:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:10, 26 July 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Indo-Pakistani War of 1947, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pifactorial 23:38, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No man, no war. PEACE. 219.91.203.71 21:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Making it more encyclopedic

You definitely want to make things a bit more encyclopedic. That includes watching your language usage, plus I felt that I had to make your pointers "more encyclopedic" that's why I tried to condense it and make it look a bit more professional-looking. In fact, it should look a bit more business-like. Don't try to invoke a cliched environment on an article or you might make it look very bad that it might turn people off. — Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 05:52, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Making it more encyclopedic

You definitely want to make things a bit more encyclopedic.

Isnt that what everyone wants to do on wiki? lol. 219.91.203.71 18:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That includes watching your language usage, plus I felt that I had to make your pointers "more encyclopedic" that's why I tried to condense it and make it look a bit more professional-looking.

Language usage? lol. Learn what painstakingly means.
If you are talking about condensing then you should checkout my latest edit! I made it even more "professional looking" than where you left it. Hope thats even "more encylopedic" for you. Its very even more business-like now. 219.91.203.71 18:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't try to invoke a cliched environment on an article or you might make it look very bad that it might turn people off.

Dude, are you talking to yourself and that too without context? lol. And thats no cliche. Please restrain from making things look bad and turning people off. Thank you. Cheers. 219.91.203.71 18:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

Good work on catching POV addition on Narendra Modi. Why don't you create an account? --Nearly Headless Nick 16:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, will think about creating account. 219.91.203.71 19:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with four tildes (~~~~), which will let others know who left it. --Nearly Headless Nick 16:26, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My final take on The Apprentice 4

I'm not gonna debate about the reasons why Toral got fired, but on talk pages, you shouldn't be bolding your text because then you are like "yelling" and/or "shouting" at the person, something that I found unpleasant. I really don't want to get into an edit war with you, so edit the article to the point you see fit, but if there are some things that I really have to disagree on and/or if I have to condense it, then you should be willing to accept my ways of condensing the article so that it can take less disk space. — Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 22:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did tell you to change the bold! And I see you have willingly accepted my very professional condensed version as it took less disk space!! :) 219.91.203.71 17:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not gonna debate on this anymore, alongside the useless tralala that you've given me over the last couple of days, apparently the tralala you've gave to me should've been used in improving the articles rather than engaging in useless chit-chat. Just accept my condensation patterns when I have to do so in any article and we're cool. That's the final chit-chat that I'm gonna give to you. — Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 22:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please dont keep leaving your useless tralala on my userpage alongside my amused replies to your inane tralala. Please keep your tralala and useless chit-chat for "Painstakingly" "improving" articles. LOL. Also, you can just accept my condensation patterns that I have to do in any article and we are cool. LOL. You can keep vainly condensing that Episode 4 of Apprentice when someone else edits it, till it has a single "last word" for all I care. LOL.
In contradiction to some people, the nice, intelligent, secure, and not-vain Sue Anne appreciated my edits and condensing of that very section of Apprentice 4 muchly (her comment below) LOL.
This is the final PAINSTAKING chit-chat I am gonna give you. HAHAHAHA. Bye Bye. 219.91.203.71 18:33, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Create an account

I really liked your edits to the Apprentice 4 page. I'd really encourage you to make an account. If you do, please leave a note on my user talk page with your new name. Sue Anne 01:11, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

It seems to me that you have acted in an uncivil manner on User_talk:Vesther#Re:Final_Take_on_Apprentice_4. It is important to keep a cool head, despite any comments against you. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and action can be taken against the other parties if necessary. Your involvement in attacking back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors, and lead to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! --Crossmr 22:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments like "useless tralala", "inane tralala" and "Please keep your tralala and useless chit-chat..." are incivil. Please refrain from using them in the future.--Crossmr 01:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply