Archives

• January 2007–May 2010 • May 2010–July 2010 • July 2010–May 18, 2013 • May 19–July 31, 2013 • August 4–September 30, 2013 • October 2013 • November 2013–November 17, 2015 • Feb. 2016-Dec. 2019 • 2020 • to November 2022 • to 26 June 2023

Can you explain why you're reverting my edit? Simply reverting without a meaningful edit summary is very rude. Parsecboy (talk) 11:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Replied. --Technopat (talk) 11:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sources for my edits were the US Census QuickFacts and a few other surveys in the demographics section of the articles. Should I copy that source again or is it better to use a source that discusses the demographics of the cities rather than just listing census data?

Also, is there some way that I can respond on my talk page to make you see my message? I don't know how to do this. 135.180.146.84 (talk) 16:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. --Technopat (talk) 20:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You mentioned on my talk page that I don't cite sources when I do cite multiple sources so where did I not cite sources??? You cant make a statement and not tell me where. Fortnitegamer3432 (talk) 20:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Replied. --Technopat (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  The YouTube video was a interview with the former Pakistani Minister of Interior, its not the only source citing Hamid Gul's participation in the battle of Jalalabad there are plenty of other sources considering the reason he got sacked was because of that specific Operations failure Fortnitegamer3432 (talk) 21:31, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Replied. --Technopat (talk) 21:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

e Article already mentioned Hamid Gul's Participation in the Battle of Jalalabad so I dont see how getting mad over a source was nessacary considering there already is a sourceh

Fortnitegamer3432 (talk) 21:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Article already had the Source* Fortnitegamer3432 (talk) 21:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Replied. --Technopat (talk) 21:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making a report about SaulGoodman6969 (talk · contribs · block log) at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Just for the record (for future reference): The user, after having received a sufficient number of warnings from other users, including a "may be blocked from editing without further warning" from an admin, continued to removed perfectly valid references, on at least two occasions that I was aware of: (an edit which had been reverted before I could do so and (and one that I reverted). This second edit was made after the page had been protected. That is not, in my humble opinion, mere "unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith". --Technopat (talk) 17:29, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Could you explain why you reverted my edit to Genetic recombination, please? Thank you. 47.155.41.201 (talk) 09:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Replied and apologised. --Technopat (talk) 09:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't revert if you don't know what is happening. 24.161.76.18 (talk) 15:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Replied. --Technopat (talk) 15:48, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why you reverted my edit about the date of death of Dr. Anthony Stevens?

Don't revert if you don't know what is happening! Иван Куряков (talk) 07:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Replied. --Technopat (talk) 07:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the sandbox. TYCF (talk) 10:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert the edit when there is no active content dispute or edit war ? Elvetham Heath TYCF (talk) 12:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

From Wikipedia:Stable version . TYCF (talk) 12:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Replied. --Technopat (talk) 12:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a edit war. TYCF (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Technopat, I know there are some unsourced content, but they are there before I started editing. And I don't understand why it is excessive and also, is it too long because of the images ? TYCF (talk) 13:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, can I revert your edit but remove the unsourced content and some photos . TYCF (talk) 13:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Replied. --Technopat (talk) 13:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Stop reverting them , I removed the things that you said were not good. TYCF (talk) 15:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Replied. --Technopat (talk) 15:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you ! TYCF (talk) 17:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't bother. I think reverting their edits is just baiting and feeding them. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 17:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note. You may have other opinions and experiences. Technopat (talk) 17:22, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. Thanks. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 17:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Technopat!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

can we please talk? I'm trying to be civil but it feels like your messing with me Wwew345t (talk) 23:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

dont blame me for a edit war that your refusing to stop Wwew345t (talk) 02:29, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Replied. --Technopat (talk) 09:09, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sir you need to visit "pakistan army equipment" page there are some informations which are based on unreliable source's, these sources itself using Wikipedia as a source and just copy pasting unreliable information of Wikipedia (uncited).And patriotic people's using these sources to save unreliable information. I researched a lot and try to edit it with reliable sources (india/pakistan army equipment) Page's,but one person still reediting it many times.I am not saying I am completely right that's why I need your help, visit page and make conclusions/edit. Dl ff (talk) 11:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]