Hello SumeetJi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Copysoft for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Template:Z166

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SumeetJi (talk) 00:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC) - Understood, will look for an News Article instead.[reply]

Hello SumeetJi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Thor's Hammer (video game) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Template:Z166

John B123 (talk) 13:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SumeetJi (talk) 00:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC) - Understood, will look for an News Article instead[reply]

An article you recently created, Arcanum Computing, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 13:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Understood, have contacted the Author for more information, Sumeet Singh, 27/09/2020.

An article you recently created, Escape Programming, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 13:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Understood, have contacted the Author for more information, Sumeet Singh, 27/09/2020.

An article you recently created, Reaping the Dungeon, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 14:00, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Understood, have contacted the Author for more information, Sumeet Singh, 27/09/2020.

Hi SumeetJi! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Link non existing page to existing page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Waterdeep: Dungeon of the Mad Mage (board game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://shop.wizkids.com/products/dungeon-of-the-mad-mage-standard-edition-online-store. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Amkgp 💬 15:27, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SumeetJi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ~ Amkgp 💬 15:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SumeetJi (talk) 00:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC) - Regarding above, understood, I only comment on that which I've used in the past, I've no affiliation with what I write on, and only do so for historical reasons to advance the human race. - Sumeet Singh 02/10/2020.[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amal Graafstra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Microchip implant. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Amal Graafstra, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 16:31, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SumeetJi (talk) 00:45, 21 November 2020 (UTC) - Reinstated page while removing all circular references to the person in questions business while keeping only verified independent sources of information.[reply]

An article you recently created, Life and death (comic series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 23:41, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33

Hi SumeetJi, if you intend to topics related to any of the above named countries, you are required to read and follow all the applicable Wikipedia policies. Failure to do so can invite sanctions. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:32, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like, even though you have been here for a while, you never received a welcome message. I will give one now. It gives you a quick guide to the various policies you need to adhere to. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Care to define which rules I broke and what instances so I don't repeat it? I've had a look at what you've linked and cannot see it at all. - SumeetJi (talk) 20:48, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The alert is about what you need to do in future, not what you have done in past. So I won't narrate the things from the past.

• A golden rule is to be civil to other editors at all times. If you engage in personal attacks or abuses, you will be quickly shown the door.
• If you are challenging existing content, you need to do so based on reliable sources, either the sources that are already being used or some new sources you bring to the table. If you bring a new source, all you need to say is read XYZ, page so and so, and it contradicts what is written here. Making arguments based on what you think is "possible" or "not possible" (you can go back and read your comments again) will not get you anywhere.
• If you are polite and make policy-based comments, you will find that other editors will pay back in kind. Otherwise, they will just walk away and ignore you. We are all volunteers here. Nobody is obligated to engage in debates with you. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 02:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 20:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SumeetJi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arcanum Computing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SumeetJi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Escape Programming, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SumeetJi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reaping the Dungeon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amal Graafstra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Amal Graafstra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah ^💬 19:52, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SumeetJi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noah 💬 19:52, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SumeetJi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Life and death (comic series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mughal Empire. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 12:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have given an appropriate response that accepts the users ruling in the Talk page with concession to remove biassed source. The user is refusing to read my edit. I will write it again one last time. SumeetJi (talk) 13:02, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• You initiated a talk page discussion only after this warning, you seem to be under the misapprehension that if you say something that's consensus. You want to change long standing content in the article, the onus is on you to get agreement PRIOR to doing that, especially when there's an objection. —SpacemanSpiff 14:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I mentioned the user in a continuous discussion section involving them named "Text in lead on "pacification" vs. "suppression"" before your comment on this talk page which another user also mentioned them. I also followed your direction after your warning and created the new section specifically for them which they haven't answered I've also escalated after reading Wikipedia's rules and posted the dispute for resolution on this page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Third_opinion#Active_disagreements SumeetJi (talk) 14:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Third Opinion listing has been removed because third opinions have been given by RegentsPark and TrangaBellam (or, depending on how you want to see it, more than two editors are now involved in the dispute, so it no longer qualifies for a Third Opinion). If further dispute resolution is desired, see here for additional options. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 19:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC) (Third Opinion volunteer)[reply]

• Final warning: Any further form of disruption will cause your editing privileges to be revoked. Just because you don't get your way, you can't indulge in personal attacks. —SpacemanSpiff 03:53, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You accuse me of "*You initiated a talk page discussion only after this warning, you seem to be under the misapprehension that if you say something that's consensus." When clearly I didn't. I did message the user and continued following your rules after. I accepted the decision and leaved my note on the article to say I'm no longer involved. What are you talking about? SumeetJi (talk) 04:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• You just went on a rant on the talk page calling people useless. If you don't understand even what you type, that's not my problem, any further disruption and you will be blocked. —SpacemanSpiff 05:02, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Context matters, I was accused first by yourself and them of misleading matters and personal attacks e.g. "troll" which were unwarranted. I accepted all decisions. Never in 5 years have I had any issue on this site except that 1 biassed racist article which I attempted to fix and even then I followed every rule once I learnt the correct way to do so. Goodbye. SumeetJi (talk) 05:23, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:SumeetJi, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 10:26, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (your reason here) --SumeetJi (talk) 10:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've been here for 5 years and never had any issues.

I've noticed racism from the Mughal Empire page from Wiki admins and authors, which led me to believe other such genocides are being lied about.

Going to other Wikipedia pages in the last 3 days shows high levels of English Wikipedia admins supporting racism.

Any rule that I broke I followed all steps to fix the issues, clearly Wikipedia is a racist website. The Uyghur genocide fake article is the final nail in the coffin from this disgusting website.

If there are going to be no non Western voices on this website to counterbalance the racism from English Wikipedia Admins, then I suggest you delete my account. SumeetJi (talk) 10:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]