Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
8		Southern Cross Campus (talk)						Add sources
128		Raj Comics (talk)						Add sources
5,388		Hawaii (talk)						Add sources
10		Diocesan School for Girls, Auckland (talk)						Add sources
5		Immanuel Christian School, New Zealand (talk)						Add sources
14		Botany Downs Secondary College (talk)						Add sources
13		Wesley College, Auckland (talk)						Cleanup
16		Auckland International College (talk)						Cleanup
71		University of Hawaii at Hilo (talk)						Cleanup
9		Henderson High School (Auckland) (talk)						Expand
22		Phage (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)						Expand
21		Index of Hawaii-related articles (talk)						Expand
275		History of Hawaii (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
260		Ferengi (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
53		Sugar plantations in Hawaii (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
18		Compositions by Liliuokalani (talk)						Merge
266		Tim Russ (talk)						Merge
2,353		SAP SE (talk)						Merge
71		Gorn (talk)						Wikify
627		Walter Koenig (talk)						Wikify
591		Where no man has gone before (talk)						Wikify
5		Jugal Devi Saraswati Vidya Mandir, Kanpur (talk)						Orphan
3		Hawaii County Band (talk)						Orphan
6		Index of structural engineering articles (talk)						Orphan
10		Oratia United (talk)						Stub
13		Sanjay Gupta (comics) (talk)						Stub
8		Fighter Toads (talk)						Stub
7		Birkdale, New Zealand (talk)						Stub
7		Auckland Seventh-day Adventist High School (talk)						Stub
3		McAuley High School, Auckland (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the warm welcome Solarra. My explanation for the personel attack I posted on your talk page is, I was not intending to attack you but I posted that with a lot of heat. The same reason applies to the numerous spelling mistakes I made in the message I posted on My talk page. This heat resulted from the fact that I thought that you were randomly calling my edits vandalism, you see: your third reversion of my edits contradicts your first reversion of my edits. Further I thought that you knew that pelycosauria is not a valid clade(my reason being that no scientist other then Michael J Benten use pelycosauria as a formal clade). Sorry for the personal attacks.Aliafroz1901(talk)14:27, 19 June 2012(UTC)

It is not a problem, I am not a paleontologist by any stretch of the imagination so I have to go off of common sense when I revert any edits. In this case I will defer to your obviously superior knowledge on the subject. Thank you very much for apologizing to me :-) If there is anyway I can help you navigate the labyrinth that is Wikipedia, please do not hesitate to let me know!

<3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Who are you? and why you changed the topic for PICkit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.157.239 (talk) 12:42, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

• You deliberately misspelled a word, and it was obviously vandalism, if you need guidance please see WP:VANDALISM :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 10:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Solarra. You have new messages at Arctic Kangaroo's talk page.
Message added 10:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Arctic Kangaroo 10:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

The age of consent in India is now 18, under the new law signed by the president. Why did you revert my change?

• source: [[1]]

read the source; it says:

"The law has fixed age for consensual sex at 18 years. Pranab Mukherjee has given his assent to the Anti-rape Bill, providing enhanced punishment for rape, making stalking and voyeurism criminal offences and fixing the age of consent for sex at 18."

• another source:[2]

"The law has fixed age for consensual sex at 18 years".

And do more research yourself, but please don't revert correct changes.12:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.27.35 (talk)

Notice on the other user's talk page I support you as does the LA Times and the Huffington Post. Thanks for bringing this to my attention :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Hello. Please take a look at this, and consider commenting there. Thanks. -- Hoary (talk) 13:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Done ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Edit to Mona's Queen (1934) shown by you in this diff, is not vandalism, and level 3 warning was unwarranted. Please be more careful and remember to assume good faith. The editor is new to WP, was spooked and concerned. He emailed me to discuss as I had given him a level 2 on the same set of edits. Reviewing the edits, I have to concur with him. -- Alexf^(talk) 14:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Fixed, as you had reverted it, I had assumed it was legitimate vandalism, thanks for the heads up :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Please see the article's talk page for the explanation of the dilemma and request for thoughts... which is what I should have done in the first place; thanks :-) Tony Holkham (talk) 20:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

The user from the Ukraine has removed information on Cossack societies in Japan because of the radical views that Anglo-Saxons and Asians can not be Cossacks. But Maxim Krivonos was a Scot. There was a lot of Kalmyks and Buryats among Cossacks. There were Asians even among Vikings according to the archeological data. Lavr Kornilov had not only Kalmyk origin, but he had a Tatar (Moslem) grandmother. So there were not only different races, but different faiths as well among Cossacks. General Karbyshev was white and Christian, but a Tatar (Kryashen).

Thanks for the information, usually when I see a major content edit on a subject I know nothing about, I assume good faith and let it slide, in this case it initially looked like Vandalism, then he started making a bunch of edits adding lots of content so to me it appeared as if he was adding legitimate content. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

The user 72... even removed information on Alexander Pushkin as an African Russian, who wrote a heterosexual poem about Mazepa, in his opinion. They recognize only "Mazepa" by Lord Byron as an LGBT poem. They hate Africans as heterosexuals and the enemies of LGBT, in their opinion. Typical WP:FRINGE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.71.0.246 (talk) 21:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed your message. The previous edit was not vandalism, it is possible to check it for example on Wiktionary, although I personally don't know how to put direct Wiktionary links on Wikipedia. 141.136.222.121 (talk) 15:27, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

I never said it was vandalism, just unsourced. Not to mention that it might be best to not place that definition in an article describing a medical condition :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Hello Solarra

The edit of the "1933 Concordat" needed distention from the a Concordat of the same year with Germany. The Concordat referenced here is with Austria. Than you for the update.Integrtiyandhonesty (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi I have many sources for Vishwaroopam Box Office, that is, the collection exceeding the 200 crore mark. Please refer these links.

http://www.metromasti.com/kollywood/gossip/Viswaroopam-50th-day-total-collections-Vishwaroopam-box-office/25900 http://www.smskhan.com/2013/03/14/box-office-collection-of-viswaroopam-48-days-vishwaroopam-48th-day/ http://www.newsmirchi.in/vishwaroopam-hit-48-days-earning-at-cinemavishwaroopam-48th-day-income/2516/ http://superwoods.com/photo-galleries/jiiva/news-id-viswaroopam-45rd-day-collections-viswaroopam-box-office-collections-11-03-136348.htm

Request to update it accordingly

Thanks,

Vijayabasker — Preceding unsigned comment added by VijayEmerio (talk • contribs) 03:23, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Solarra,

thanks for dropping me a line about your removal of my comments.

I think they should be added back to the article.

By their very nature, there cannot be any references, as follows:

statement (i) [in essence]:

'current concepts of hair growth cannot account for the continued growth of transplanted hair': explanation: a 'reference' for that would be a meta-review of all research on hair growth. However, the research presented in the article (further below) already illustrates the point that all those mechanisms don't explain why one hair from the same individual would grow in one site after putting it in there while others from the same individual don't. I think it is important to point that out because people mostly don't realize that all the molecular pathways don't explain that obvious clinical observation.

statement (ii):

there are no genetic twin studies for male balding explanation: I checked it on PubMed and Google-- be my guest, do the same! How do you reference 'searched on PubMed but not found'???

kind regards John — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.36.198.228 (talk) 08:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

After checking the logs, I didn't revert the said edit, if you have any questions about sourcing please check WP:SOURCE :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Hi Solarra - thank you for writing to me about the edits I made to this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_machine_translation_applications Can you tell me why you think the source I cited (www.bing.com/translator/help) is not sufficient proof that Bing Translator supports the languages that I added to the article? The language list as listed on this official Microsoft page is as follows: CURRENTLY SUPPORTED LANGUAGES Arabic Finnish Italian Romanian Vietnamese Bulgarian French Japanese Russian Catalan German Korean Slovak Chinese Simplified Greek Latvian Slovenian Chinese Traditional Haitian Creole Lithuanian Spanish Czech Hebrew Malay Swedish Danish Hindi Norwegian Thai Dutch Hmong Daw Persian Turkish English Hungarian Polish Ukrainian Estonian Indonesian Portuguese Urdu

You can actually try them at http://bing.com/translator. Here is the blog announcement: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/translation/archive/tags/languages/

Would love to hear from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.0.40 (talk) 08:40, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

After checking the edit and reviewing the source I restored the edits and removed the message on your talk page, in order to avoid a misunderstanding such as this in the future, please use descriptive edit summaries when editing tables and figures as such edits are often performed as vandalism. If you wish feel free to make an account to avoid such an issue in the future. It's free and anonymous :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Will do, and Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.0.40 (talk) 16:47, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

But the edit was made because that user make attack. When I editted page, I included reasons on talk page. User SeanHoyland only reverted and made an attack at me and another user with no constructive addition. So I remove his attack, but no harm done. Dasixiaoriben (talk) 08:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Upon review, the edit in question to a talk page and article being heavily vandalized did constitute vandalism. Please refrain from changing other people's posts on talk pages :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Yes, SeanHoyland is vandalizing with revert war and personal attacks. I have right to change attack on me because his attack is against Wikipedia policies. I not vandalize anything, I just make another constructive edit on article page and will make one on the talk too. Maybe you can take off your vandal police uniform and put on your mind-your-own blinders. Dasixiaoriben (talk) 08:56, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

This edit [3] is vandalism. Please see WP:VANDAL :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Not vandalism. But to make you happy, I just remove SeanHoyland comment whole. It is not constructive and have no place. It is vandalism. Dasixiaoriben (talk) 09:03, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

"Preventative" iz not a word. It haz an extra syllable that means it stems from "preventate", which iz also not a word. So, please whenever you see it, and for inexplicable reazons, this non-word iz prolific, chaynj "preventative" to "preventive". 75.152.121.253 (talk) 10:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Please see [4] and [5]. Editing an article simply to change an English variant is generally frowned upon. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

If I wrote an orijinal sentence with regular jeez or "iz", then it wouldn't survive for a second. British English articles are on wikipedia that seem to contradict what you say.75.152.121.253 (talk) 10:22, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi,

It was recently found that Taribo had lied about his age so I was updating it to his real age. Please see http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2303426/Taribo-West-accused-lying-28-40.html for more information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.29.74.39 (talk) 10:15, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

In the future please reference the source when you post birth date changes as such things are often changed to vandalize pages :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

"European federalism" suggests an ideology, not a group. The UEF are not the only group promoting European federalism. The Federal Europe article better explains this ideology. --109.153.96.239 (talk) 10:52, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Generally changing redirect changing is a common form of vandalism and misinformation. After researching the subject I agree with you and have removed the vandalism message on your talk page. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

HI Solarra Do you really think that Sir Isaac Heard lived to be 140? His correct year of death is 1822. Please re-correct.

Fixed.  :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

please do not remove content regarding Energetically Modified Cement on the "Cement" page. The content is approved by a leading academic in the field. So please, do not vandalise the page. You are a law student. Respect freedom of expression and the limits of your expertise.

And I do not want to debate this, I do not have time.

Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jono2013 (talk • contribs) 11:15, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Nothing to debate, edits are restored and warning removed :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Again, Corporation and Incorporated is different types of companies, but Corps and Corporation is the same. Applist (talk) 12:14, 4 April 2013 (UTC) Apple Forever!

I removed the warnings on your talk page, however the company is called Apple Inc. per [6], and it could be construed as vandalism to change it :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Splendid edit!!! You was right!! Thanks! -Talk to me? See what I done? I am Applist 03:18 UTC —Preceding undated comment added 03:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Good anti-vandalism work!...Keep it up! TheStrikeΣagle 12:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello. I saw you reverted the last edit on "Femen" article. The edit did not represent a vandalism, as it is possible to check that many of the protests organised by FEMEN are indeed highly controversial, which does not mean negative or bad. 141.138.38.202 (talk) 13:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I didn't say the edit was vandalism, merely unsourced. If you wish to add that an organization is controversial, please source it :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

You gave a last warning (Lv 4) to User talk:Rebsec. He had not received any warnings whatsoever before. All he had was a speedy deletion notice and a username COI concern notice. Neither one is considered a vandalism or spam warning so a Level 4 is unwarranted. -- Alexf^(talk) 13:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I appreciate where you are coming from, however this particular user is obviously a promotional account and the edit in question [7] was a self promotion in the form of vandalism. In this case I feel a level 4 warning is warranted as the point needs to be made clear that vandalism is not tolerated for self promotion or any other purpose :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Addendum Actually it was two edits including [8] and the one mentioned above. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Promotional? Yes. A report to UAA is warranted in this case. For spam/vandalism, a Level 3 was more appropriate as it says Please Stop. A Level 4 says Last which makes no sense when there are no previous warnings. -- Alexf^(talk) 13:58, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I see where you are coming from :-) Next time I'll use the 'Only' template in a similar situation, or if using Huggle a level 3 as you suggest. Thanks again :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Addendum: Added the user to UAA as suggested :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 14:05, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Solarra, perhaps you hadn't noticed, but as soon as Southern Wear 307 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was indefblocked for vandalism, I undid all their unsourced airing date related edits, as, based on their birthday vandalism, I assume these are faulty as well. Also, thanks for having removed that clueless comment from my talk page. If there's more, don't bother removing though — I'll try to say something. Cheers, and keep up the good work! - DVdm (talk) 13:56, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Did you even read my edit? Did you see the information I changed was as per source? Did you see the information on the page had two different dates of birth? Thanks. 86.183.98.24 (talk) 14:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

This page has had much vandalism from several IPs over the course of the last few hours. Birth date vandalism is a very common practice :-) I have removed the vandalism notes off of your talk page and requested the page be protected so that the vandalism will end for the time being at least :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 14:08, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your welcome message. Perhaps it would have been better to read through fully the change I made and the reason I gave with my edit, before jumping on my supposed vandalism. 86.183.98.24 (talk) 14:10, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Not a problem. Might I suggest making an account, as it will free you from popping up on anti-vandalism tools, allow you to edit semi-protected articles, and allow other users to more easily communicate with you. It is free and anonymous :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

I don't see what was wrong with it. Its a forum all about her so why can it not appear as her website? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BollyFanJenny (talk • contribs) 14:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not an aggregate website for links about celebrities and the like, it is an encyclopedia. It is generally frowned upon to post fansites to articles unless it is the official site for the actor/actress in question. As a courtesy I removed the warning from your userpage. Thank you :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Hi Solarra, We are the communication department of The Mauritius Commercial Bank Ltd. Please note that we are currently feeding updated information on the MCB. Information that you can confirmed on our website : www.mcb.mu

Kind regards, MCBCom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcbcom (talk • contribs) 14:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a promotional site, your username may violate Wikipedia username policies. Please see WP:USER ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

whoops. I was rolling back his edit and dropping a template at the same time you were. My rollback failed but the template went through. Feel free to remove it from users page if you like. Thanks - 4twenty42o (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I had a message off you recently about the date of release. I believe it was actually released in 1974, and written in 1965. I'm not sure what the presented date is to do with but would be interested to know. Please let me know any other information about the song.

From The Corries Wikipedia Page - "They had several albums in the top 50 album charts in Scotland, and released a single: - "Flower of Scotland" (1974)."

If you have a good source for a change in a date or figure on an article please change it :-) Just be sure to source it too, lots of vandals change dates and figures as a form of stealth vandalism. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Could you please kindly stop your reverts before you actually discuss? There is probably some confusions regarding the facts. Thanks. 14.0.144.102 (talk) 15:58, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Could you please stop before we discuss? Thanks. 14.0.144.102 (talk) 16:03, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I was reverting the edits because there is no edit summary nor is there any kind of explanation as to what was being done. To me and several editors it looked like vandalism. Please use edit summaries when removing large amounts of content from articles and/or changing redirects. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

I understand you are reviewing many edits yet still I believe it'd be better if you can refrain from revert wars until you have familiarised yourself with the topic(s) concerned. 14.0.144.84 (talk) 19:51, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Solarra. Jeff Sams was best man in my wedding and we have know each other since 1979. YOu have the birthday wrong. It's 6/18/68. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.98.140.67 (talk) 16:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

That's fine, please cite a source when changing dates on Wikipedia, especially living persons per WP:BLP ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Hi, the alterations I made to the page entitled "1984 UEFA cup final" were not meant by me to be a test, but rather a genuine improvement of the page by adding an infoBox -- in keeping with more up-to-date pages of finals of the UEFA cup/Europa League e.g. the page entitled "2012 UEFA Europa League Final". Obviously I would prefer my alterations to remain, but if you have some kind of objection to the introduction on an infobox then I won't make a fuss about it. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.74.195.209 (talk) 16:39, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Edit restored and message removed, in the future be sure to leave edit summaries to let other editors know what you are doing :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Hello. Yes you made a mistake by reverting my edit. The topic is simply never going to expand beyond two lines, and hasn't done for seven years now. What it relates to is whether a Muslim can or cannot perform the Hajj pilgrimage. This can easily be covered by transferring the two lines of text to the lead section of the Hajj article. 90.218.98.130 (talk) 09:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Than please propose the merger using the proposal process. Single editor deletion of articles into a redirect can be construed as vandalism :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

I took the liberty of proposing the mergers and placing the tags on the respective articles. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

I am the editor of the online Perihelion Science Fiction magazine. I would appreciate it if ONLY the magazine submission from User:Crossdown/sandbox is reviewed and considered. A couple of my colleagues went ahead and tried to create Wikipedia articles. I thank them for their support, but these articles were not to be posted for review without my approval. I doubt they will be approved in any case; they violate Wikipedia standards all over the place. Again, please only consider the submission from User:Crossdown/sandbox. Cancel the submission review request from User:Lynn_Usher/sandbox. Thank you. Sam Bellotto Jr, editor, Perihelion Science Fiction. Crossdown (talk) 10:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

By some means I don't quite follow I had created two pages Motor Vessel Murree and MV Murree. MV Murree was the correct one with all edits. The other was a duplicate and lacked some content. I am in the process of trying to delete it totally and if you can help with that that would be useful. Robert — Preceding unsigned comment added by TWAMWIR (talk • contribs) 10:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I will sort this out, and explain what happened on TWAMWIR's talk page. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Please explain what is wrong with the post i placed on GRAW. I have only advised people that a page exists for players of the game where they can arrange clan matches post results and talk to other gamers. I see nothing wrong with what I did.

Please advise before I take further action.

Ray Rudd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xl BOOSTER lx (talk • contribs) 10:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The link you posted is considered spam and not encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a social network it is an encyclopedia. Hope this helps :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}