Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Because of the serious nature of these allegations I requested several Bureaucrats and Admins to review my edit history.
Roger Davies (talk | contribs)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 99: Line 99:


- [[User:Ret.Prof|Ret.Prof]] ([[User talk:Ret.Prof#top|talk]]) 04:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- [[User:Ret.Prof|Ret.Prof]] ([[User talk:Ret.Prof#top|talk]]) 04:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

== Meditation diffs ==


Can you please remove from your ArbCom statement the quotes and diffs taken from meditation. The relevant policy says [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy#Principles|Mediation proceedings are privileged and cannot be used as evidence in an arbitration case or community user-conduct proceedings]]. &nbsp;[[User:Roger Davies|<span style="color:maroon; font-variant:small-caps">'''Roger Davies'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|''talk'']]</sup> 14:51, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:51, 1 September 2014

'Wikipedia does not care about you or me being qualified scholars. Wikipedia is not a scholarly site, but a summary of sources that speak for themselves. We all have the right to edit, but there are rules to make sure that proper sources are used for appropriate articles and editors are civil. If you want to accuse me of a Christian bias:

Please read this.
Archbishop Desmond Tutu comes to my home in South Africa at the height of our struggle. The house of Nelson Mandela was just down the road.

At Wikipedia we must all try to edit from a NPOV. On occasion my Faith has been called into question. Indeed some have honestly wondered how I can write what I have about the Historical Jesus and still be a Christian. The answer is simple, my relationship with God never had anything to do with history or archeology. Let me explain...

Christianity not relevant in our modern world As a young litigation lawyer, I believed in God, but felt that Christianity was no longer relevant in our modern world. Jesus' teachings such as "Thou shalt not kill" "Love your enemy" "You can not serve both God and Money" were just not relevant in these modern times. I believed in the death penalty, war, material wealth. I did unto others before they did unto me. I did not get angry, I got even...and a bit!

Spiritual awakening Then, a series of events made me reconsider my beliefs and come to the conclusion that the Gospel of Jesus Christ was still relevant today. I read a great deal about people who still believed in the Gospel, including Mahatma Gandhi, Dr Martin Luther King Jr., etc., etc. This led to a Spiritual awaking that forever changed my life.

South Africa It was here, working for Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Nelson Mandela that my faith was put to the test. Could love and non violence really bring down the Apartheid government? We were out-gunned, out-matched in every way. What the Archbishop was preaching made no earthly sense. Yet before my eyes I witnessed this racist government fall. As I stepped out in faith on a daily basis, I experienced God in a real way. In my heart I came to believe that the Gospel of Christ was the most powerful force in the Universe. The Roman Empire never stood a chance. Nor did the British Empire in India, or, for that matter, Segregation in the South.

Twelve Step Program Several years later I was approached by a group who wanted to use my Church. They explained to me that their program was basic Christianity without many of the offensive "buzz words" that had been added over the years.

  1. Confessing that we were miserable sinners became "We admitted we were powerless over alcohol or drugs etc -- that our lives had become unmanageable."
  2. Faith was changed to "Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity."
  3. Accepting Jesus Christ as our Personal Saviour became "Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him."
  4. Accepting that we had all sinned and fallen short of the Glory of God was changed to "Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves."
  5. Making our confession was reworded to "Admitted to God, to ourselves and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs."
  6. Repentance became "Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character."
  7. Bin saved became "Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings."
  8. "Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all."
  9. "Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others."
  10. Continued confession became "Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it."
  11. "Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God, as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out."
  12. Born Again & Witnessing became "Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to others, and to practice these principles in all our affairs."

This simplified "Gospel" has transformed the lives of millions. It is truly powerful regardless of the packaging. My faith finds form in Anglicanism because of the freedom from "strict dogma", but I have seen the power of Christ in all denominations. Walking with Christ for these many, many years has given me a faith that allows me to edit Wikipedia from a NPOV. The reason is that my faith is not based on the "historical evidence" that has survived to 2014 but rather it is based upon my experience over a very very long time...and now to have a Pope whose focus is love, forgiveness and caring for those in need rather than dogma is a true blessing!


Talk Page Archives:
Archive 1 (2008)
Archive 2 (2009)
Archive 3 (2010)
Archive 4 (2011)
Archive 5 (2012)
Archive 6 (2013)
Archive 7 (2014)



.






Mediation:To what extent, should Matthew's Gospel in Hebrew as described by Papias be represented in the Gospel of Matthew?

As to content, I believe the mediation has been helpful...particularly regarding FRINGE and RELIABLE SOURCES. However during the Mediation discussion, I was warned: Frankly, "if this continues even another few days, I am going to find the time to file an Arbcom request and solicit permanent sanction, being either a full site ban, or at least a topic ban. Ret.Prof. you need to withdraw again or we are going to arbcom this time." Although I complied, I felt it was very, very wrong. I was further advised that I was not allowed to respond such threats and other behavioral issues at Mediation.

I now agree that the time had come to finally resolve this issue and "pull this problem out by the roots." Therefore in accordance with Wikipedia Policy I am requesting Arbitration. - Ret.Prof (talk) 04:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Arbitration

After the ANI and the Mediation regarding Papias, I decided to stop editing the Gospel of Matthew or any Wikipedia articles. I chose to work on my userspace and shift my focus to different areas of interest putting the Gospel of Matthew behind me. My goal was a simply one. I would prepare some "draft edits" on several different topics. At the end of the summer I would present this work for review. Only if the proposed edits were found worthy by other editors would they be incorporated into Wikipedia articles. (I personally would no longer do any actual editing of WP Articles.) The result was even more conflict:

Because of the serious nature of these allegations I immediately stepped back from editing and sought advice from a a number of Bureaucrats and Admins. They indiated that attacks on me were are out of line - "userspace is granted broad discretion." diff Furthermore, it is not appropriate to "bully" them away and "blank their pages". diff Finally, NONE of the Admins or Bureaucrats believed that my userspace use was wrongful or in violation of any Wikipedia policy.

I am now convinced I am being "made an example of" and that I will be followed and harassed anywhere I go. My deficiencies as an editor have been expanded to include:

Because of the serious nature of these allegations I requested several Bureaucrats and Admins to review my edit history to see if I had done anything to warrant being banned from Wikipedia. None of them could find any edits to justify the allegations of rudeness, vexatious editing, etc brought against me. Admin.MichaelQSchmidt looked into the situation and his response was “Your only "sin" has been to be calm and reasonable in the face of negativity." And “your edits based upon existing policy and guidelines are sound. Your stepping back from areas of drama is to be applauded.”

I now believe the time has come to request arbitration:

  1. To have any user account found guilty serious wrongful behavior be banned from editing 'Jewish or Hebrew' Christianity (30 CE to 90 CE) for a period of three months.
  2. Because intimidation is a key factor, it is my hope that I will not be banned. My being banned would send the wrong message to those good faith editors who would like to edit but do not want to put themselves in jeopardy.


- Ret.Prof (talk) 04:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Meditation diffs

Can you please remove from your ArbCom statement the quotes and diffs taken from meditation. The relevant policy says Mediation proceedings are privileged and cannot be used as evidence in an arbitration case or community user-conduct proceedings.  Roger Davies talk 14:51, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply