Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Madchester (talk | contribs)
m Reverted edits by Relaxing (talk) to last version by Madchester
Madchester (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


As an aside, you shouldn't be deleting another editor's comments, even if it's a welcome message per [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines]]. However, you are free to [[WP:ARCHIVE|archive]] past comments. Cheers, --[[User:Madchester|Madchester]] 17:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
As an aside, you shouldn't be deleting another editor's comments, even if it's a welcome message per [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines]]. However, you are free to [[WP:ARCHIVE|archive]] past comments. Cheers, --[[User:Madchester|Madchester]] 17:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

==Talk page==
{{Uw-tpv1}}

Again, please don't remove other editors' comments without their permission per [[WP:TPG]]. If you fwish to free up some space, please [[WP:ARCHIVE|archive]] past comments instead. Thanks. --[[User:Madchester|Madchester]] 17:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:36, 17 October 2007

Hi Relaxing

Not sure but "The Information Age" seems to have some formatting problems... I see you are still working on it. Is this work in progress?? VictuallersVictuallers 14:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boxfive

Hi. I've placed the most recent version of the article (most recent one without a deletion tag on it, that is) in your userspace, at User:Relaxing/Boxfive. When you're ready to move it to the article space, go ahead; I'll undelete the older edits for GFDL purposes at this point in time. Picaroon (t) 15:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted User:Relaxing/Boxfive since it was a duplicate of the post at User:Relaxing/Box Five (draft) and User:Relaxing/Box Five (draft) now include references not listed in User:Relaxing/Boxfive. -- Jreferee t/c 15:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied Box Five

I uerfied Boxfive to User:Relaxing/Box Five (draft) per this request. Please post a request at WP:DRV before moving your draft article to Boxfive. -- Jreferee t/c 15:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weird Fishes/Arpeggi

I would recommend leaving the tag there until discussion has actually taken place. It's a bit of a jump to assume that a lack of discussion equals no interest in a merge. There actually haven't been that many unique registered editors working on the page; further exposure will actually lead to more conversation.

Currently, the In Rainbows songs have yet to gain any individual notability to warrant separate articles. Should a song be released as a single or become an important, verifiable highlight in the band's musical development, then it can be included under the Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Songs. Articles should be created to reflect notability; they shouldn't be created to induce or anticipate future notability, that's simply speculation. --Madchester 14:16, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that verifability does not imply notability. Again, we create articles on Wikipedia because the topic is notable; we don't create them to promote it or anticipate its future popularity or significance.

As an aside, you shouldn't be deleting another editor's comments, even if it's a welcome message per Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. However, you are free to archive past comments. Cheers, --Madchester 17:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Again, please don't remove other editors' comments without their permission per WP:TPG. If you fwish to free up some space, please archive past comments instead. Thanks. --Madchester 17:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply