Template:Active editnotice

A category you created is currently being discussed at Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion#Category:Wikipedians_who_support_proprietary_software. User:Dorftrottel 16:37, January 15, 2008

Thanks for protecting that page. Reverting was becoming annoying. Take Care and Happy Thanksgiving...NeutralHomer • Talk • November 27, 2008 @ 06:34

Hey i'm mczack26, im from the i.p. adress

90.204.97.40

Which you just declined, is this a way of verifinging that tilejoin is no longer on this address? There are other people on the network who edit anon.

P.S. It's a sad day when people can't edit anon on wikipedia...

Hello, Od Mishehu. You have new messages at Cobi's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Since you used rollback rather than give a summary, I thought I'd ask... Pcap ping 10:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This template is intended to populate Category:Computer language stubs. In general, any changes to stub categories and their templates should go through Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals or Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read Talk:Computer language? Would you really want me to take the stub to deletion and have someone retag a few hundred pages? Do you actually have a content argument here rather than behaving like a bot with a mop? Pcap ping 10:35, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As in general with Wikipedia:Deletion discussions, redirect is a potential outcome. Additionally, your action would mean deleting Category:Computer language stubs. If you think such action is appropriate, bring it to Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion, proposing to redirect the stub template and delete the category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is something about you on ANI....[[1]] Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:36, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible your recent vandal has anything to do with your ANI thread? Hell In A Bucket (talk) 05:35, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

07:56, 10 September 2009 Od Mishehu (talk | contribs) deleted "Led eleven" ‎ (Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject (CSD A7))

Hi Od Mishehu, I am new to Wikipedia and tried to include an article about a local "Band" in the Rhein-Main area around Frankfurt in Germany. They are a tongue in cheek-performance act and somewhat well-known to the locals here. They have been around for about 2 years and do regular performances.

Is it possible to include a description of them in Wikipedia?

Thanks for your help,

freakbrother —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freakbrother (talk • contribs) 08:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read our notability guide, and the sub-guide on bands, and decide for yourself. Please note that if you doo write an article, you should make it clear why they are important/significant, and cite a source for your claims. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:31, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help at Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives. --68.0.124.33 (talk) 03:52, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This was not a favor for you. I believe that it will reduce the amount of false positives, while still catch nearly all bad removal of all categories (whether by accident or vandalism). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:16, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Od Mishehu, I come to you because I urgently need admin help to protect two film articles: Veer-Zaara and Har Dil Jo Pyar Karega, and my request on WP:RFPP has not been taken care of for almost a day (in addition you cannot request protection for two pages). One individual with different IP accounts strangely keeps messing up the credits order in these two articles, swapping places between the film's supporting actor and leading actor (he is clearly a fan of this particular actress and thus gives her higher billing in both articles). He does that continuously through different accounts and now he did that again. I thought to follow WP:RBI or something, but it's impossible. Could you please protect these two articles? Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it looks to me like there's an edit war going on, and that if you keep up you could be blocked for edit waring. We definitely don't need semi-protection here, ass this would give you an unfair advantage in what seems like an edit war where both sides are acting on equally good faith. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry? Edit war? In fact, I did not revert him again because I expected an admin to observe this. Please assume good faith on me instead of sending me warnings. I frankly feel very offended at your reaction. I've been on Wikipedia enough time to understand what I'm doing and what an edit war is. There's no edit warring here and no good faith from his part, and as you see, the anon uses different IP accounts to swap places between the film's leading actor and supporting actor. This is definitely sneaky vandalism. This is as simple as anything can be. Would you like this to remain this way? Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how this can be categorized as obvious vandalism. There may be some reason this anon is re-ordering the list (note that the content of the list isn't being modified) from multiple IPs. In fact, the exception to 3RR which mentions vandalism (bold is in the original; parts I want to emphasize are underline) says:

Obvious vandalism – edits which any well-intentioned user would immediately agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding cruel or offensive language. Legitimate content changes, adding or removing tags, edits against consensus, and similar actions are not exempt.

It seems to me that what you've been reverting isn't what's described here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:26, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]