Hello, I'm NeilN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Great power, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Great power, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Do not add Italy without a proper source NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LuigiPortaro29! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! McSly (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Hello. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Great power without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Baking Soda (talk) 22:41, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Culture of Italy into Soft power. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:24, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. To add to Theroadislong's comment above, please kindly take a look at the relevant Wikipedia editing policies on Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Any edits that do not comply with these policies will be reverted. It looks like you are new to Wikipedia and might not be aware of these rules. Thank you for your understanding and have a great day! Ceramicist (talk) 22:23, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you check this article.All states have official sources while Italy not.The only official source for Italy is ISTAT.All other countries have official reports while Italy just a private report that isn't an official national source and so it's even a mistake .Nobody trusts that Italy has lower wages than Spain.151.40.70.152 (talk) 04:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me why did you delete Spain from the page of cultural power? What is not true?? I can't believe it, do you got any reasonable explanation or you just did it because you wanted?

Spain,^[1][2] according to the World Economic Forum, Spain is the main cultural turistic center of all Europe, you can check it on the reference 2. I will not start a battle to say who is more than who, that's irrelevant, but what's a fact and true that Spain is obviously a cultural power and the heritage of the Spanish culture which affects all Iberia and Latin America unless Brazil, Surinam and the Guyanas. I've seen that you're a valuable Wikipedia editor.

Here you have some sources to check it; Spain is the cultural heritage for the Spanish language and Iberoamerican world. --TechnicianGB (talk) 09:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

None of those sources appear to explicitly call Spain a cultural superpower, just a cultural power. Antiochus the Great (talk) 15:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, one of the sources call Spain as the main reference for global Spanish heritage, and the cultural center of the Spanish culture and language. I've seen that even a librarian has edited after me and no one deleted it, in fact, it's a fact that Spain has influenced very much on the history of the world and specially on Latin America. I don't consider that it must be in another place as a "superpower", but it must be inside the cultural side, no? Kind regards! --TechnicianGB (talk) 13:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@LuigiPortaro29: what is wrong with you? I am seeing that some months ago some users stated clearly to you why Spain is a cultural superpower (with sources) because it's the creator of the entire Hispanic world and Spanish culture and you delete it because you want it just 6 days ago? "because the sources are in Spanish"? which kind of unuseful excuse is that? Translate it, it's not anyone's problem but yours if you want to check it. --Pfarla (talk) 02:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LuigiPortaro29. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh really? What kind of vandalism am I practicing? Yes, I already talked to you on your talk page but you didn't answer me. Levamigao (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Levamigao: I am trying to explain you why you are destroying the Publication of Credit suisse with the data of globalfire page , Credit Suisse new Publication is not out yet, we should wait a few months, I can not understand why you always do this? LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 01:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the Power (international relations).Italy and India aren't reported with the right ranking.Map to delete.89.97.225.68 (talk) 11:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Middle power has been vandalized several times by several people.I stopped them even today.Same thing for Great power and Power (international relations).In the list of the active military ships of the Italian Navy should be added the Rizzo as GP FREMM.Another article to follow is list of european countries by average wages where eastern states activity is very very high for propaganda (especially from Hungary;is he really an hungarian?).Thanks.89.97.225.68 (talk) 14:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your edits on Satellite navigation because I think you removed the added info a bit prematurely. There is a discussion on this on the talk page. We need to build consensus on this topic before moving forward and taking unilateral decisions. I feel a comparison of all satellite navigation systems (global or otherwise) is a nice thing to have. Please put forward your suggestions/arguments on the Talk page. Thanks Adamgerber80 (talk) 13:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you erased comments on this talk page (section about Italy/India). Is there any policy based reason for that? Such action could be considered harmful by admins with possible sanctions against you as an outcome. I don´t think IP will complain, but someone other may notice. Pavlor (talk) 05:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You just vandal wikipedia by placing too many dot at the end of sentence and break the meaning of the topic sentence (and capitalized The Company). "Pirelli‎ was a listed company but current a subsidiary", is one sentence. It would confusing people by break one sentence in two, separated by another sentence of Pirelli‎'s product. Matthew_hk tc 08:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I introduced a better synthesis, People watching your comment on Pirelli, They think everything is now all of Chinese origin, but it is not. Why do not you put a Chinese Flag in the Pirelli section too? Then you will be satisfied. Shareholds of Pirelli is another thing. Since Pirelli will be ALWAYS based in Italy as well as the 100% of Technology and research will be made by La Bicocca University of Milan as well the students and Scientists are Italians ,So the spine, technology, and commercial will always be Italian. Otherwise it would be another thing, it would not be Pirelli anymore. it is clearly that you want think that "all" Pirelli is now Chinese?, Wrong, You must look at the Official Page of Pirelli, they even not mentioned yet Chem Chen as the main Shareholds of Pirelli Because before it was an industrial Plan 2003-2016. So in summary the official company does not even show that ChemChina is the major shareholder of Pirelli, so YOU is doing Patriotic vandalism not I. I'm trying simply to do a better version. LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 08:44, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Luigi, i appreciate your efforts in the article of Italy. However, one needs to keep in mind that in that particular section it is about the economy of the whole Nation. In this context an image depicting an vehicle of Fiat is without a doubt more representative than a vehicle of Ferrari. Moreover an image of a Ferrari car is already included in the section of sports, and you can still include an image of a Ferrari in the main article of Economy of Italy. So much on that topic so far. Grazie.--Joobo (talk) 14:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since i just read your edit comment again, i see that you stated i am for whatever reason "not impartial". I expect an apology or explanation for this from yourself otherwise this is a violation of WP:PA.--Joobo (talk) 14:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry , Of course that you are not the right to add and delete images WITHOUT even know about Italy, if the Ferrari cost more than The mercedes and the Jaguar, I don't know. as well Germany is very Know for the Volkswagen not for the Mercedes , Italy is very Know for the Ferrari. why you are obsessed with Italy?, If you want to make a Good Job, Start doing it around in other Pages .--LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 15:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you sorry if you say i am not the right one for editing on that page? Looks like sarcasm to me. And how do you come to the conclusion that i am not capable of editing on the article page of Italy, or "not knowing" about Italy, just because my username on Wikipedia is not Luigi as well or Alessandro or Ventura? I am flabbergasted that you apparently even continue with your personal attack on me openly questioning my capabilities for edits on this page without any evidence to back that up. I just want to let you know that the Ferrari is a sports car. Mercedes and Jaguar are "only" luxury vehicles manufacturers. That is one major difference. Another one was already mentioned by me earlier. Ferrari as well known, and famous it is, is simply a fairly small Italian company and does not stand for the broad Italian auto industry, whereas Fiat or FCA does. Another important mentioning is the fact, that an image of Ferrari is now already included in the sports section of the article. One does not need two images of Ferrari in this country article.--Joobo (talk) 15:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not do on Italy. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. --Joobo (talk) 20:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can write in the Template to delete history of great powers.Benniejets (talk) 14:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you write in Template for the deletion of Ggreat power history plese?I already wrote for it.You are doing a great job.Thanks.)Benniejets (talk) 16:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Bravo!) Benniejets (talk) 14:35, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) --LuigiPortaro29 15:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)