Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
→‎SPI: Reply
Line 30: Line 30:
:{{rto|Wee Curry Monster}} No, the additional tells I was thinking of were linguistic. I didn't notice any wikilawyering in the sock's edits. Maybe my inability to see it is one the reasons I get along with Martin. I'm an [[Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors|aspie]], so I tend to read what Martin writes more or less literally. I suspect that you and others find much more in there, perhaps more than Martin intended. Ultimately, that's Martin's problem to deal with, but that might help explain why the two of you keep locking horns. (Or maybe not; I haven't been around for the MOSNUM conversations, so maybe I'm off base here.) [[User:Lesser Cartographies|Lesser Cartographies]] ([[User talk:Lesser Cartographies#top|talk]]) 00:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
:{{rto|Wee Curry Monster}} No, the additional tells I was thinking of were linguistic. I didn't notice any wikilawyering in the sock's edits. Maybe my inability to see it is one the reasons I get along with Martin. I'm an [[Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors|aspie]], so I tend to read what Martin writes more or less literally. I suspect that you and others find much more in there, perhaps more than Martin intended. Ultimately, that's Martin's problem to deal with, but that might help explain why the two of you keep locking horns. (Or maybe not; I haven't been around for the MOSNUM conversations, so maybe I'm off base here.) [[User:Lesser Cartographies|Lesser Cartographies]] ([[User talk:Lesser Cartographies#top|talk]]) 00:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
::I'd spotted linguistic similarities too but I would pick out one edit in particular as characteristically wikilawyering in the Martin style. I don't know what his issue is, I have my suspicions but even when I walk away and leave him to it, he just won't let it drop. At the root of it, is that I think Martin sees things in binary terms, if you disagree, even slightly, from his position, then you're the enemy. Being an engineer, I'm pragmatic and I'll compromise, whereas I don't think he can. I just find the waste of potential, well sad, for want of a better expression. He's blown it again as far as I can tell. <span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Wee Curry Monster|W]][[Special:contributions/Wee Curry Monster|C]][[User talk:Wee Curry Monster|M]]</span><sub>[[Special:EmailUser/Wee Curry Monster|email]]</sub> 00:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
::I'd spotted linguistic similarities too but I would pick out one edit in particular as characteristically wikilawyering in the Martin style. I don't know what his issue is, I have my suspicions but even when I walk away and leave him to it, he just won't let it drop. At the root of it, is that I think Martin sees things in binary terms, if you disagree, even slightly, from his position, then you're the enemy. Being an engineer, I'm pragmatic and I'll compromise, whereas I don't think he can. I just find the waste of potential, well sad, for want of a better expression. He's blown it again as far as I can tell. <span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Wee Curry Monster|W]][[Special:contributions/Wee Curry Monster|C]][[User talk:Wee Curry Monster|M]]</span><sub>[[Special:EmailUser/Wee Curry Monster|email]]</sub> 00:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

== Self-notifying to save DeFacto the bother ==


{{Ivmbox
|'''Please read this notification carefully:'''<br>A community discussion has authorised the use of [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|general sanctions]] to curtail disruption related to [[systems of measurement]] in the [[United Kingdom]]. Before continuing to make edits that involve units or systems of measurement in [[United Kingdom]]-related contexts, please read the full description of these sanctions [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Units in the United Kingdom|here]].

[[Wikipedia:General sanctions|General sanctions]] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behaviour]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Units in the United Kingdom#Log of notifications|here]]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
| Commons-emblem-notice.svg
| icon size = 50px}}

Revision as of 04:55, 14 November 2014


A page you started (The News Letter of the LXIVmos) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The News Letter of the LXIVmos, Lesser Cartographies!

Wikipedia editor Slashme just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Fascinating article!

To reply, leave a comment on Slashme's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SPI

I take it from your comments on the IP SPI you spotted the same behavioural similarities I did eg wikilawyering? WCMemail 21:36, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Wee Curry Monster: No, the additional tells I was thinking of were linguistic. I didn't notice any wikilawyering in the sock's edits. Maybe my inability to see it is one the reasons I get along with Martin. I'm an aspie, so I tend to read what Martin writes more or less literally. I suspect that you and others find much more in there, perhaps more than Martin intended. Ultimately, that's Martin's problem to deal with, but that might help explain why the two of you keep locking horns. (Or maybe not; I haven't been around for the MOSNUM conversations, so maybe I'm off base here.) Lesser Cartographies (talk) 00:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'd spotted linguistic similarities too but I would pick out one edit in particular as characteristically wikilawyering in the Martin style. I don't know what his issue is, I have my suspicions but even when I walk away and leave him to it, he just won't let it drop. At the root of it, is that I think Martin sees things in binary terms, if you disagree, even slightly, from his position, then you're the enemy. Being an engineer, I'm pragmatic and I'll compromise, whereas I don't think he can. I just find the waste of potential, well sad, for want of a better expression. He's blown it again as far as I can tell. WCMemail 00:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Self-notifying to save DeFacto the bother

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions to curtail disruption related to systems of measurement in the United Kingdom. Before continuing to make edits that involve units or systems of measurement in United Kingdom-related contexts, please read the full description of these sanctions here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Leave a Reply