Hi Kend94! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

The article Asian in Sweden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article seems to have been created off the back of other diasporic ethnic group articles. There are no WP:RS for the stub (nor is it even marked as being a stub), and the only connected article with some little sourcing is Swedish Indians. It is WP:OR that doesn't meet with WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you made a changes to the articles Overseas Indonesians and Indonesians, but you didn't provide reliable sources. They've been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add them, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Swedish Indians, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:32, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Arabs in Sweden, you may be blocked from editing. —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 09:05, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:58, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the status of the page after so many edits.Xx236 (talk) 09:55, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{ is not a correct page. I don't know what to do, but you aren't cooperative either.Xx236 (talk) 10:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Sro23 (talk) 11:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Swedish Indians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Meriam Abbas has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. noq (talk) 11:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb is not considered a reliable source, because much of its content is user-generated, see WP:USERG. JohnCD (talk) 14:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Algerians in Sweden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algerians in Sweden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Novarupta (talk) 12:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey please do not delete Algerians in Sweden I beg you, dont do that it I'll do anything what do you want! Please dont! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kend94 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kend94! Please discuss the article and its deletion proposal at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algerians in Sweden. It's not me who decides if it will be deleted, but community Consensus, and as a part of the community you can (and should!) participate in the discussion.

As for "I'll do anything" — this is not blackmail :-) Nobody wants you to beg for mercy or do favors. However, what I would like you to do, is to get familiar with the Policies and guidelines, in particular the following three which apply in this particular case as well as for other pages you created: Copying within Wikipedia · Notability · Verifiability. I very much appreciate your interest in migration and your motivation to improve coverage of this topic on Wikipedia. But you need to understand that, while everybody is invited to edit Wikipedia, certain basic standards apply. Your contributions don't have to be perfect, there's a whole lot of mistakes that you're allowed to make (and this being Wikipedia, somebody will eventually come and fix it), but there are a few things that you must adhere to, like Copyrights and Core content policies. If you do that in the future, your contributions will have a much better chance of not being deleted. Please read those guidelines I linked to, and then keep contributing well-sourced content! Happy editing :-) --Novarupta (talk) 08:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In case you're a bit overwhelmed with all the rules and guidelines (I sure am sometimes!), Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset gives a great summary. But be aware it's only a summary, the actual guidelines give much more information, so click on those links if you want to know more. --Novarupta (talk) 09:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Algerians in Sweden. Dl2000 (talk) 21:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Algerian in Sweden. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Algerians in Sweden. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Algerians in Sweden – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to European Australians, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why so delete Algerians in Sweden? Why? you do that i beging you dont do that i do what ever you want if you can take back please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kend94 (talk • contribs) 07:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1. When you comment on talk pages (like this one), please always leave an empty line before your comment and sign it by writing ~~~~ after your comment.
2. It was deleted because of Copyright violations. Which you would know if you would had bothered to read Articles for deletion/Algerians in Sweden.
3. Please read the guidelines. I posted some links in my previous comment above. If you follow the guidelines you're welcome to continue adding content to Wikipedia, but if you violate Copyrights or other important guidelines the content will be deleted and you may get blocked from further contributing.

--Novarupta (talk) 09:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

what do you mean i have ride it! but i why delete this page algerians why? who i can take contact ? Why do that?

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you made a change to an article, African immigrants to Sweden, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Manxruler. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Slovene Australians, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Manxruler (talk) 12:18, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Afghanistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Syrians in Austrian. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Syrians in Austria. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Syrians in Austria – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. cyrfaw (talk) 08:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kend94. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Iranians in Denmark. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Iraqis in Denmark. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Iraqis in Denmark – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. agtx 16:36, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Template:Middle Eastern American without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let me Explain because Afghanistan its not Middle East and dont forget Afghanistan its Asian !!!!

A) Please do not WP:SHOUT; B) Always leave a WP:ES when you are making major changes; C) Read the note: "The U.S. Census Bureau considers Afghanistan a South Asian country, but does not classify Afghan Americans as Asian, but as Middle Eastern American." with sources provided. It is the template for "Middle Eastern American", therefore the template follows the U.S. definition of the ethnic group because we cannot engage in WP:OR no matter if it seems to be an anomaly. Okay? Have you finished edit warring the content now? --Iryna Harpy (talk) 09:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An edit summary is a brief explanation of an edit to a Wikipedia page. When you edit a page, there is a small text entry field labeled Edit summary located under the main edit box and above the Save page button:

It is good practice to fill in the Edit summary field, or add to it in the case of section editing, as this helps others to understand the intention of your edit. Edit summaries are displayed in lists of changes (such as page histories and watchlists), and at the top of diff pages.

Hi. I see that you've been creating articles such as Moroccans in Belgium but haven't been citing sources that support the article content. Please have a read of WP:VERIFY to understand why it is important to cite source - especially for things such as population estimates. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't add unsourced material to articles with citation needed tags included in the edit. Those tags are for tagging existing unsourced content with. If you don't have a source that supports the material, then you shouldn't be adding it in the first place. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've also removed this, which was also unsourced. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Syrians in the United Kingdom has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear from inspecting the edit evidence that 84.208.144.64 (talk · contribs) is you editing while logged out. Editing while logged out at times in controversial areas is in violation of our policy on multiple accounts. We are going to treat the combined edits as being the responsibility of the account, going forwards, and in addition you should avoid logged out edits in the future to avoid possible sanctions for IP sockpuppetry. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 21:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:39, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note that continuing to edit in the same way after this block expires will result in longer blocks. Please carefully read (and ideally respond to) the concerns other editors have posted here. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

excuse me?? why have you blocked me I just want to save profile to Syrians in the Netherlands !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kend94 (talk • contribs) 19:51, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see all of the warnings above, and the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#84.208.144.64 and Kend94 (again). Cordless Larry (talk) 19:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ok can you do me a favor Remove block from me?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kend94 (talk • contribs) 20:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The process for requesting an unblock is outlined in the block message above. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)‎[reply]

Huh What you say ? i dont understand! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kend94 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Use {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} to request a lifting of the block. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:09, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Syrians in the Netherland. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Syrians in the Netherlands. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Syrians in the Netherlands – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Syrians in the Netherland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://syrianrefugees.eu/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Refugees of the Syrian Civil War into Syrians in Egypt. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:32, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Syrians in the Netherland. Hi there, I'm quite certain that you are adding to these articles in good faith. But you are duplicating existing articles, adding facts with no supporting references, and copying material from other websites to paste in directly. You can't do that here. Please post here on your own talk page, or ask for help on mine. I would like to help but if you continue to act without taking our advice here then you will be blocked again and ultimately could be permanently barred from editing here.Template:Z46 Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 12:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]