Aaron Brenneman (talk | contribs) →Falling off the wagon: As if in subconscious rebellion for the excellent advice I gave... |
Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
== Falling off the wagon == |
== Falling off the wagon == |
||
As if in subconscious rebellion for the excellent advice I gave, I suffered a relapse at Wikipedia:Deletion policy yesterday. 0_ο <br/> <br/>I know it's difficult, but really try to just ''do nothing''. Think of it as a Zen version of extreme sports, where they shove [[wasabi]] up your nose and you have to sit perfectly still and smile.<br/> <br/>[[User:Aaron Brenneman|<font color="#2f4f4f">brenneman</font>]][[User Talk:Aaron Brenneman|<font color="#2f4f4f"><sup>(t)</sup></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Aaron Brenneman|<font color="#2f4f4f"><sup>(c)</sup></font>]] 23:28, 5 December 2005 (UTC) |
As if in subconscious rebellion for the excellent advice I gave, I suffered a relapse at Wikipedia:Deletion policy yesterday. 0_ο <br/> <br/>I know it's difficult, but really try to just ''do nothing''. Think of it as a Zen version of extreme sports, where they shove [[wasabi]] up your nose and you have to sit perfectly still and smile.<br/> <br/>[[User:Aaron Brenneman|<font color="#2f4f4f">brenneman</font>]][[User Talk:Aaron Brenneman|<font color="#2f4f4f"><sup>(t)</sup></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Aaron Brenneman|<font color="#2f4f4f"><sup>(c)</sup></font>]] 23:28, 5 December 2005 (UTC) |
||
==Personal attack injunction== |
|||
In my opinion [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SaltyWater&diff=prev&oldid=30262928 This] edit in which you describe Pigsonthewing's conduct as bullying, violates the personal attack injunction placed on you by the arbitration committee for the duration of the case, as does [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Leonig_Mig&diff=prev&oldid=30261748 this] in which you characterize his conduct as trolling. I don't think a block is yet merited in your case, but I am warning you not to engage in this kind of characterization again. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]]|[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 05:53, 6 December 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:53, 6 December 2005
| Please put your messages below. Also if you get a chance, please take a few minutes to assist me by contributing to my user subproject on the Political Perspectives of Wikipedians. |
ArbCom elections
I answered your question regarding my Candidate statement. I also made comments you my be interested in @ Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2005/Straw_poll#No_more_appointees. Cheers, Sam Spade 22:54, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
Keetoowah’s 60 day ban
I think your action against Keetoowah is outside your authority and exceeds the recommendations of the arbitration committee. I mean, 60 days, that’s a bit harsh especially considering your apparent personal relationship with LuLu. I hope you reconsider. TDC 22:25, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed you reverting this page several times to remove a particular disputed paragraph, could I ask you to join the discussion on the talk page Talk:Phoenix Park please?
Thanks,
Demiurge 23:11, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Falling off the wagon
As if in subconscious rebellion for the excellent advice I gave, I suffered a relapse at Wikipedia:Deletion policy yesterday. 0_ο
I know it's difficult, but really try to just do nothing. Think of it as a Zen version of extreme sports, where they shove wasabi up your nose and you have to sit perfectly still and smile.
brenneman(t)(c) 23:28, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Personal attack injunction
In my opinion This edit in which you describe Pigsonthewing's conduct as bullying, violates the personal attack injunction placed on you by the arbitration committee for the duration of the case, as does this in which you characterize his conduct as trolling. I don't think a block is yet merited in your case, but I am warning you not to engage in this kind of characterization again. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 05:53, 6 December 2005 (UTC)