Archives

no archives yet (create)

Gastrich, PRT, October 2005, December 2005, January 2006, January 2006a, February 2006, February 2006a, March 2006, April 2006, May 2006, June 2006, July 2006, September 2006, October 2006, November 2006, December 2006, January 2007, February 2007, March 2007, April 2007, May 2007, June 2007, July 2007, August 2007, October 2007, December 2007, January 2008, February 2008, March 2008, April 2008, May 2008, June 2008, July 2008, August 2008, September 2008, October 2008, November 2008, December 2008, January 2009, February 2009, March 2009, April 2009, May 2009, June 2009, July 2009

• In science, any compromise between a correct statement and a wrong statement is a wrong statement. Thanks, user:Stephan Schulz.
• Sad now. Special:Contributions/Geogre.
• My Last.fm profile
• vGuyUK on Twitter | SceptiGuy on Twitter

Obligatory disclaimer

I work for Dell Computer but nothing I say or do here is said or done on behalf of Dell. You knew that, right?

This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify) This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time. This user is a Rouge admin.

Hello, JzG. You have new messages at Talk:Christian_Science#Pseudoscience_in_the_lead.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I worked as a recording engineer when I was younger and would encourage you to consider recording with your Bach choir, just keep it simple.

There were two schools of thought, German and British, about recording classical music. The former preferred multitrack recording — this was in the days before digital — while the latter would record directly to stereo if possible and often with a single pair of mics.

All it took was a hall with excellent acoustics and performers who could balance levels correctly, in other words, good musicians.

Technology has lowered the cost of high-grade recording if you keep it simple and mic prices have plummeted.

Get yourself a two-channel mic or matched pair for a few hundred and a two-channel recorder, preferably 24-bit, and make music! — Robert Greer (talk) 20:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• That was the way Suvi Raj Grubb preferred to do it, if I recall correctly, and I am pretty sure that's how he managed to make the farewell disc for Gerald Moore in such short order. The problem we always have is getting good enough mics; every amateur choir tends to be sop-heavy, our tenors and basses are strong and the balance is good in the venue but when we record it we've almost always found that the bass line is lost. I suspect this is because of where the mics are positioned, the fact that they are designed to pick up speech tones not sung tones, and of course the fact that you have to filter out background noise in a hall. We should try a studio day, I think, with a good engineer with proper kit. Maybe the next Douai programme, which will revisit Schoenberg's Friede Auf Erden. It's a good idea and thank you. Guy (Help!) 22:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicholas Parsons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rector (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JzG, just following up a comment you made elsewhere. When companies contact OTRS, why not ask them to put their drafts on their websites? That way, editors can use them as source material, as we would any other source. The objection at the moment is that source material from the company is being privileged over any other source, by not being cited, but instead being added directly to the article, with no way to tell the readers that they are reading the company's text.

That was what we always used to do when an article subject asked to add perspective. We asked him to put it on his personal website, then we were able to cite it and quote him. Primary sources are allowed to be used that way so long as they don't swamp the article. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 22:18, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]