Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Please don't remove templates like you did [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Expulsion_of_Cham_Albanians&type=revision&diff=734068639&oldid=733829950 here] until issues have been resolved. You have no special authority as a [novice] DRN volunteer, even though you seem to be under the impression that ''your'' "instructions" with regards to the content dispute can be enforced by administrators. [[User:DevilWearsBrioni|DevilWearsBrioni]] ([[User talk:DevilWearsBrioni|talk]]) 12:57, 13 August 2016 (UTC) |
Please don't remove templates like you did [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Expulsion_of_Cham_Albanians&type=revision&diff=734068639&oldid=733829950 here] until issues have been resolved. You have no special authority as a [novice] DRN volunteer, even though you seem to be under the impression that ''your'' "instructions" with regards to the content dispute can be enforced by administrators. [[User:DevilWearsBrioni|DevilWearsBrioni]] ([[User talk:DevilWearsBrioni|talk]]) 12:57, 13 August 2016 (UTC) |
||
:{{Ping|DevilWearsBrioni}}They can, as per [[WP:M]] I have given you the link to it three times. [[User:Iazyges|Iazyges]] ([[User talk:Iazyges#top|talk]]) 13:29, 13 August 2016 (UTC) |
:{{Ping|DevilWearsBrioni}}They can, as per [[WP:M]] I have given you the link to it three times. [[User:Iazyges|Iazyges]] ([[User talk:Iazyges#top|talk]]) 13:29, 13 August 2016 (UTC) |
||
::{{Ping|DevilWearsBrioni}} Here's a direct quotation: Any administrator[4] may upon request by a mediator, and after a single warning by either the mediator or the administrator, block, ban, or otherwise sanction a participant who continues to participate in mediation in a manner which violates the rules established by the mediator or the editing rights granted to the mediator.[5] |
Revision as of 13:37, 13 August 2016
Case | Created | Last volunteer edit | Last modified | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Title | Status | User | Time | User | Time | User | Time |
Neith | In Progress | Potymkin (t) | 11 days, 7 hours | Potymkin (t) | 1 days, 9 hours | A. Parrot (t) | 3 hours |
Riley Gaines | Closed | Lisha2037 (t) | 7 days, 16 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 11 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 11 hours |
Chechil | Closed | Lemabeta (t) | 1 days, 21 hours | Kovcszaln6 (t) | 1 days, 20 hours | Kovcszaln6 (t) | 1 days, 20 hours |
Algeria | In Progress | Potymkin (t) | 1 days, 18 hours | Kovcszaln6 (t) | 20 hours | Skitash (t) | 5 hours |
Turntablist transcription_methodology | Closed | WikiSkratch2000 (t) | 1 days, 11 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 7 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 7 hours |
Collatz Conjecture | Closed | 45.50.231.56 (t) | 12 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 5 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 5 hours |
If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put {{DRN case status}} on your page. Click on that link for more options.
Last updated by FireflyBot (talk) at 03:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
.
format of your user page
Hello Iazyges and thanks for the comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Crusades/archive2. :-)
On your user page, the Byzantine Military History group seems interesting; I might join if I have time. On my screen/resolution/browser at least, however, that bit of text physically overlaps one of your userboxes. I can try to make a screen capture if you like, but this problem is easily resolved by adding {{-}} (just a hyphen between two pairs of curly braces). That clear a line of text. Cheers and thanks again Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 02:48, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Lingzhi You can join even if your inactive, we dont really have room to be picky and i must say you have a very cool user page. Iazyges (talk) 03:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- I joined. And tks for the kind words about my upage. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 03:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Regarding this edit, I live in Asia; we're a day ahead. :-) Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 09:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- I joined. And tks for the kind words about my upage. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 03:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the patience.
Hi, I am one of the participants in the odd Cham Albanian NOR case which you have recently mediated, and I just wanted to thank you for your patience towards me, because my nerves with this never-ending NOR dispute, I admit, they have broke for good... We have been debating this NOR dispute on THREE separate pages, and you can imagine how this, for some users, can unfortunately be too much . I just passed by here to thank you and assure you that this is not your fault nor you have something to do with it. Just I really want to exit this counter-productive situation of a never-ending nonsense dispute and focuse on other but more practical things. Have a good day, and again thank you for your patience. -- SILENTRESIDENT 14:18, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Closure on Cham Albanians
Thank you for taking over the case. You marked the case closed, but didn't provide a close summary and didn't archive (box) the case. Since you are a new volunteer, I understand that is a nitty-gritty detail. If you want to write a summary of what you think the resolution is, I will be glad to handle the detail of boxing the case with a closure summary. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Robert McClenon, thanks a lot for helping me. Summary: "The provided sentences were found to not be OR." Is that good or should it be longer? Iazyges (talk) 18:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Question on Rollbacking multiple edits
Hello once again. This is my second comment in your talk page (and pardon me I did not intend to flood your talkpage with that many messages lol). The reason of this message is just to ask something I have noticed often, in the History logs of various articles: a feature called "Rollback" I have been a Wiki user for so many years, and yet, I haven't figured how to do that Rollback feature (aka, revert multiple minor edits at once). Can you spare just a mere a minute of your time and let me know how to do rollback and how to access this function? Well, I am not exactly sure if special privileges (such as Administrator or Moderator privileges) are needed for Rollbacking? Or is it accessible to regular users such has me? In fact, rollback could be handy tool because, in the past, I have had stumbled upon various anonymous IP users who often showed up and vandalized various politically sensitive articles such as the Balkans and Middle East, but their edits were spread across multiple history log entries rather than one single edit with a single history log entry. And thus, reverting all these many edits, one-by-one, by clicking on the revert button multiple times, can be tedious and I was wondering if there is any way to revert multiple edits with just a click? My apologies if asking you about Rollbacking is inappropriate or something, just I have no clue about it at all. Any info will be much appreciated. Thanks. -- SILENTRESIDENT 08:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Nevermind, my question is now obsolete and can be ignored - rollback info found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Rollback . Thank you for your time and understanding and have a good day (And feel free to remove my messages from your talk page if you like) -- SILENTRESIDENT 08:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Ping
To alert others the usage is {{ping|Example}} not [[ping|Example]]. Using [[User:Example]] will also alert the user, but doesn't add a @ in front of the users name as {{Ping}} does, which is mainly used when responding to someone in a discussion. SilkTork ✔Tea time 10:22, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Don't remove OR template until issue(s) have been settled
Please don't remove templates like you did here until issues have been resolved. You have no special authority as a [novice] DRN volunteer, even though you seem to be under the impression that your "instructions" with regards to the content dispute can be enforced by administrators. DevilWearsBrioni (talk) 12:57, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- @DevilWearsBrioni:They can, as per WP:M I have given you the link to it three times. Iazyges (talk) 13:29, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- @DevilWearsBrioni: Here's a direct quotation: Any administrator[4] may upon request by a mediator, and after a single warning by either the mediator or the administrator, block, ban, or otherwise sanction a participant who continues to participate in mediation in a manner which violates the rules established by the mediator or the editing rights granted to the mediator.[5]