Second Quantization (talk | contribs) m m |
Dave of Maryland (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have finished with this. '''[[User:Dave of Maryland|Dave of Maryland]] ([[User talk:Dave of Maryland#top|talk]]) 01:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)''' |
I have finished with this. '''[[User:Dave of Maryland|Dave of Maryland]] ([[User talk:Dave of Maryland#top|talk]]) 01:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)''' |
||
:You have strong feelings about astrology and science. Why not try editing stuff unrelated to astrology and science? |
:You have strong feelings about astrology and science. Why not try editing stuff unrelated to astrology and science? [[User:IRWolfie-|IRWolfie-]] ([[User talk:IRWolfie-|talk]]) 10:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC) |
||
Dear IRWolfie, |
|||
Over the past two weeks I have learned the best way to get a Wiki editor's attention is to tell them to go away. |
|||
I have finished with this phase. |
|||
The situation is grave. I will present this to the community on Monday. In two days. The presentation is nearly done. I will most strongly urge immediate legal action. The community has 30 years case law experience. I do not think Wikipedia will present much problem. |
|||
If Wiki knows of a law that prohibits Astrologers from speaking for themselves, it should avail itself of it. I will make a presentation and I will await instruction, but I do not think Wiki covenants will be a problem. |
|||
On behalf of the astrological community, with 2000 years of recorded history, I welcome Wiki. |
|||
'''David R. Roell |
|||
AstroAmerica.com |
|||
[[User:Dave of Maryland|Dave of Maryland]] ([[User talk:Dave of Maryland#top|talk]]) 16:52, 22 September 2012 (UTC)''' |
|||
Revision as of 16:52, 22 September 2012
I have finished with this. Dave of Maryland (talk) 01:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- You have strong feelings about astrology and science. Why not try editing stuff unrelated to astrology and science? IRWolfie- (talk) 10:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Dear IRWolfie,
Over the past two weeks I have learned the best way to get a Wiki editor's attention is to tell them to go away.
I have finished with this phase.
The situation is grave. I will present this to the community on Monday. In two days. The presentation is nearly done. I will most strongly urge immediate legal action. The community has 30 years case law experience. I do not think Wikipedia will present much problem.
If Wiki knows of a law that prohibits Astrologers from speaking for themselves, it should avail itself of it. I will make a presentation and I will await instruction, but I do not think Wiki covenants will be a problem.
On behalf of the astrological community, with 2000 years of recorded history, I welcome Wiki.
David R. Roell AstroAmerica.com Dave of Maryland (talk) 16:52, 22 September 2012 (UTC)