This is the Dario D. Talk Page.

1. [1] I don't know where else to turn for this, so I'm posting it here in the hopes that someone who really understands Wikipedia policy can help. Someone deleted an entire, well-cited, carefully written criticism section I posted for the IPod Touch (no reason given), then after I restored it, they deleted it again, and pointed me to a FAQ posted at the top of the discussion page, which said that having a criticism section was "generally discouraged". (I COULDN'T BELIEVE WHAT I WAS READING - and it was proven shortly after that the statement was false) Here is a link to the absolutely pristine, irremovable crit section I wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IPod_Touch&oldid=295630451#Criticisms ...and the debate is actually on the Talk:IPhone page (notice 'IPhone', while the issue is mostly about the IPod Touch crit section, but ultimately covering the issue about whether or not BOTH pages get to have one) The discussion there is long, but you should get the entire gist in just a minute, either by skimming, or just reading the last couple posts. Look for "Call to Criticisms" and the 2 sections under it. Thanks. --[ Dario D. ] 15:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at iPhone shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Just to let you know, I would be justified in reporting you to the Administrators' notice board, but I'd rather not have to do that. Please don't edit war while we're trying to do work things out on the talk page. -- Atama^chat 17:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]