This is just notification that I am using your edits as an example in the Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 March 19 # COI article-space templates discussion on how the template should not be used. (diff to my comment) --Zache (talk) 20:10, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is nothing short of a miracle that we have any volunteer editors like BMK left with people leaving such ridiculous comments and accusations on their talk page. VAXIDICAE💉 20:20, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, just to make my point more clear. Adding problem templates to articles where there is no problems is misuse of the problem templates. No matter what is single user opinnion on how they should be used. Also edit warring ([1], [2]) to impose your own way and giving self-declared topic bans related to own editing is an example of Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. I guess that as Beyond My Ken is experienced editor he knows this, but it is maybe little bit hard to see from own perspective and I dont see how the pattern of the operation would change if nobody says it aloud. --Zache (talk) 05:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. I had written a long explanation of why you are wrong, but I really don't care to spiel it again, since you have clearly not paid it any attention previously. Frankly, I'm not impressed by the number of Finnish editors banding together to protect the sub-standard edits of a Finnish paid editor, which shows me that they're not at all dedicated to the Wikipedia volunteer ethic, as I and most other en.wiki editors are.

Paid editors are a serious problem, one that undermines the credibility of Wikipedia in general and, if not more strictly controlled, could lead to the demise of the encyclopedia as a credible source of unbiased information. In my opinion, paid editors should not be allowed at all, and their contributions, when found, should be completely reverted, but for one reason or another that does not seem to be possible. Therefore, I will continue to use all the methods -- all the legal methods -- available to let our readers know when editing by outside agents has sullied our articles.

Now, this is the end of this discussion on this page. Go elsewhere, please. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say that I appreciate your recent comments at WP:AN re that community ban - "What a mess this entire thing is...". Indeed it was and is, what a sad situation. Shearonink (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:27, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After seeing your minor c/e here, I assume in some clerking/admin capability, shouldn't the section 'Statement by {Tataqp}' be renamed to 'Statement by Tataqp'? The relevant username here is Tataqp, not {Tataqp}. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:34, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm neither an admin or a clerk. I made that edit because, like you, minor things like extra lines bug me. I saw the unnecessary braces, though, and decided to let it be. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond My Ken, No worries, I'll ping a clerk then (User:Dreamy Jazz?). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:41, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 19:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, are you fit enough to participate in that RfC ?Halbared (talk) 14:04, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I actually agree that WP:AN is probably a better place for Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Suggested edit restriction for Carlossuarez46. The reason I posted it to ANI was that Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Placed by the Wikipedia community seem to be mostly on ANI, especially recently, so I thought it belonged there. (and if there hadn't been an existing AN discussion that would have probably been right) So thanks for moving the discussion. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 14:04, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. My understanding is that discussions about sanction created ex nihilo should go on AN instead of ANI, but a sanction discussion which arises organically from a discussion on ANI should stay there and not be split up. Since there was already an ongoing discussion on AN, I thought it was best to keep them together there. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:20, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Command Decision screenshot1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Command Decision screenshot1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aspects (talk • contribs) 18:06, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @ Beyond My Ken; Please do not make personal attacks; but keep your comment on content, not on the contributor. I have removed your attack on another editor at the referenced discussion. See [[3]]. Please be civil. Apart from anything else, this will make you more likely to carry the day with your argument. With friendly regards and all respect. Springnuts (talk) 20:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening, I have responded to the 3O request at Talk:Rob_Brezsny#Trump_prediction. I hope it may prove helpful. Regards, Springnuts (talk) 19:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I saw. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I got a message from you. In this regard, can you pay attention to this discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Duchy_of_St_Sava#Why_does_someone_block_pointing_to_the_practice_of_double_standards?. We discussed the topic and then someone makes meaningless objections without knowing the topic (without knowing the facts, also) and tries to edit Wikipedia in accordance with their political beliefs. I find that unacceptable.

P.S. At the very bottom of the page you have a summary of this discussion.

I find this to be completely unacceptable behavior - Disruption on Wikidata by Santasa 99

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Duchy_of_St_Sava#Disruption_on_Wikidata

Great Khaan (talk) 19:28, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]