It is approximately 2:39 PM where this user lives (NSW). [refresh]

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31

Archive index This talk page is automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. Threads with no replies in 7 days may be automatically moved. Discussions here are automatically indexed by User:Legobot)

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

• [1]
• [2]

I know you actively watch Category:Pages using infobox television with unknown parameters and I've pretty much filled it up with empty invalid parameters now being tracked, but give me a week or so and I'll (hopefully) slowly remove all entries. --Gonnym (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've just come home and was thinking "I really should ask Gonnym if he's doing anything with all those articles." :) --AussieLegend (✉) 15:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hoping to get a bot help with cleaning most of these. Did not expect there to be around 10k of articles here. The other pages had around 1k. :) --Gonnym (talk) 16:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not at all surprised that there were 10k. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I want this issue with episode and seasons to be settled already. But right now there’s a discussion on whether they should be included or not. So far people seem to split on the issue. I thought we should revert the pages back to before everything was an issue. I even asked for your help on this issue. Rodent Zuna (talk) 18:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have investigated this and the TBS sources support Riggleby. Are you arguing that TBS doesn't know its own episode numbers? Please discuss this at the LoE page talk page, not here. --AussieLegend (✉) 18:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please stop reverting edits that you disagree with. A dispute or disagreement should be discussed in the article's talk page, not in the form of constant reverting. Your reverts are disruptive and unconstructive to proper discussion and progress. - Cement4802 (talk) 00:41, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]