Hi Archersbobsburgers! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 12:41, Sunday, September 23, 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Bancor protocol. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:Zackmann08 Thanks for the tip I was able to fixed a few of them Archersbobsburgers (talk) 19:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To fix 'timebinding', we indeed change phrases like "currently" and "recently" (i.e., relative terms) to "as of 2014", etc (i.e., absolute terms).

As for "sources with uta", I'm not 100% clear what you're asking. Stripping out UTM tags? DS (talk) 18:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DS thanks for the clarification on that. Far as the stripping tags yes I meant UTM. Take a look at these. There are dozens maybe more from the same site with the same "incorrect" UTM that looks like it was organized to be that way. Thanks for you maintence list. You can see have I have worked on it lots. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daegu_International_Airport&diff=prev&oldid=860839094
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kumamoto_Airport&diff=prev&oldid=860839107
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Los_Cabos_International_Airport&diff=prev&oldid=860839037
Archersbobsburgers (talk) 19:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

MER-C 11:53, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]