Welcome to My talk page! Feel free to leave a message here, thanks!

Hello 344917661X,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Concert Properties for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dom from Paris (talk) 23:28, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 344917661X. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 16:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Concert Properties, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Development (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that {{stub}} goes right at the end of an article -see WP:ORDER. Putting it anywhere else makes life harder for stub-sorters. Thanks. PamD 23:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Mount Dennis (disambiguation), 344917661X!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please note that disambiguation pages should only list things that have the same name and are thus likely to be confused, not titles that are merely similar to each other or are partial title matches. The articles Mount Dennis and Mount Denson do not need disambiguation from each other. Also, disambiguation pages should have only one link per bullet point, so that the reader is quickly and accurately conveyed to the correct page. I've removed improper titles, and since this only disambiguates two articles (Mount Dennis is the primary topic, Mount Dennis station is the only other article which might realistically be called "Mount Dennis"), I will nominate this page for speedy deletion, since it functionally duplicates the hatnote at Mount Dennis.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mount Dennis (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunnybrook Stable Fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunnybrook Stable Fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Quek157 (talk) 11:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I withdrawn the nomination since you had added all info, I turned it into a redirect. I hope you can expand on things rather than one article, the park itself is not defensible per WP:ROTM and WP:GNG already FYI. --Quek157 (talk) 12:42, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Sourcing gives no indication that this is a serious topic with anything like significant coverage. Suspect it's actually an advert.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fatblogging and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fatblogging, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 22:02, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to put MAME or other emulators under ports, per this edit. Practically every arcade game can be played in MAME, so we don't need to mention it. Namcokid47 (talk) 20:10, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I don't know why I added that. 344917661X (talk) 00:37, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ZI Jony was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Draft:Parascenium, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Don't submit duplicate drafts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:344917661X/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:344917661X/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 00:08, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that! I had no idea the other one had been submitted! 344917661X (talk)

Listen, I understand your saying, but honestly. Your making it very difficult for me to enjoy Wikipedia now. I hope your satisfied with the deletion, but know that people who word comments so rudely that it puts a bad rep on the wiki. I don't even like the game! It was just fun to make an article that was a W.I.P!!!! So thanks, also real original name :( Timwardo (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please calm down, I am not trying to be mean to you. I'm just pointing out that your edits were uncyclopedic as metioned in the AFD. Also, the article is getting deleted because there are not enough independent, reliable, secondary sources for it to be on this website, see the nominator's comment on the AFD page for more information. Also, complaining over your edits getting deleted and articles getting deleted is just not worth it. Please listen to what other people have to say before you get mad at people like me. Three of my articles were deleted, but did I whine and complain about it? No, instead, I looked at their point of view and understood why they were doing what they were doing. Wikipedia has rules, and if you don't like them, then leave. Also, you insulting me for wording myself rudely is very hypocritical because you insulted me as well at the end of your comment by making fun of my username. Please do not leave bad faith comments like the ones you left and attack others just because they deleted your edits or articles. If you want to act like that, then this website is not for you. Again, i'm not trying to be rude. 344917661X (talk) 18:10, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly believe that article satisfies the minimum criteria of notability and should not be abruptly deleted. Instead, an improvement is needed. Please do take part in AfD. AchaksurvisayaUdvejin (talk) 18:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? I didn't participate in that AfD. I think you're talking to the wrong person. 344917661X (talk) 20:24, June 20 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Firefly was:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I would suggest incorporating this content into the entry at Wiktionary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Parascenium and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Parascenium, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ƒirefly ( t · c · who? ) 22:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree, I just submitted it because it was in the 1911 edition of the Encyclopaedia Brittanica and I wanted to see what would happen if I submitted it. 344917661X (talk) 23:27, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Apple Watch Series 4. Since you had some involvement with the Apple Watch Series 4 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 18:24, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ping-O-Tronic, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

(t) Josve05a (c) 02:46, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Last month you added a "Context" banner to the article on John Francis Fortescue Horner. I have just got around to looking at this and wondered if you could explain a little more (perhaps on the article talk page) about what you think is needed?— Rod ^talk 17:17, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, more is needed in the introduction. 344917661X (talk) 22:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a go at expanding the lead, could you take a look and see if this is what you wanted?— Rod ^talk 08:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. 344917661X (talk) 22:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC) 14:38, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Theatre of ancient Greece#Characteristics of the buildings. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Theatre of ancient Greece refers to this as a paraskenia. We need to verify which is the correct spelling. Or maybe both are legitimate?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Parascenium and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Parascenium, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 18:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

MER-C 11:37, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]