Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. - F.A.A.F.A. 00:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think that accusing someone of having a bias -- in other words, violating WP:NPOV -- is a personal attack? That would set a very dangerous precedent indeed. -- BryanFromPalatine 20:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. - F.A.A.F.A. 01:10, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia guidelines dictate that you assume good faith in dealing with other editors. Please stop being uncivil to your fellow editors, and assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia. Thank you. - F.A.A.F.A. 01:10, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:30, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed DP1976 and BryanFromPalatine. It is  Possible that 12ptHelvetica is the same. Dmcdevit·t 09:05, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry Findings DP1976 & BryanFromPalantine

Reposted by F.A.A.F.A. 09:34, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

12ptHelvetica (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been blocked indefinitely for being a "possible" sock puppet, not a "confirmed" sock puppet. (See above post by Dmcdevit, reposted by FAAFA.) This is like a life sentence without parole for being a "possible" drunk driver. There was no conviction. If I may continue to use this analogy, the Breathalyzer test was inconclusive. I encourage you to commute the "sentence" to time served. Thank you.

Decline reason:

By this comment you are effectively confirming that you are indeed a sockpuppet. You have confused Wikipedia processes with a criminal court, where such a comment might have any weight. - Mike Rosoft 17:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.