These accounts have made some 3700 edits. Zhanzhao is highest with 3470 edits.

DanS76

Contributions in 100 percent same namespaces.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

• "TALK",[8][9] "possibly vandalism",[10][11] " already summarized",[12][13] "Removed POV language",[14][15] "my 2 cents",[16][17] "properly attributed",[18][19] "more accurate to", [20][21] "Re-added",[22][23] "overly detailed",[24][25], "my defense".[26][27]
• Page move war,[28][29] and edit war[30][31] on a specific article at the same time.
• Exactly same votes and choices;

• AfD,([32][33], [34][35] )
• RFC/UA ([36][37])
• Deletion review,([38][[39])
• Ban discussion.[40][41]
• ANI,([42] [43], [44],[45], specific weight to "COATRACK"[46][47])
• Accepting own article for submission.[48]

• Edit warring, evading 3RR.

• Signed in Wikipedia after 58 days[49] for evading 3rr. Zhanzhao,[50][51] DanS76.[52]
• Zhanzhao [53][54][55] DanS76 [56], previous edit was 45 days ago.
• Zhanzhao [57], DanS76 [58]

29 March

49.244.254.146, Bargolus,(12 edits in 8 years, 10 edits today) 124.41.243.167

Bargolus claimed that he was 49.244.254.146,[59] he edited the comment of 49 as well, and soon he edited the own comment with 124.41.243.167.[60]

• Start message with "Hi there"[61] like Zhanzhao.[62][63][64]

• Attempts to create wikilink([[ ]]) of URLs.([[http://www.example.com/example]])[65] like Zhanzhao.[66][67][68][69]

• Edit war on other article.[70][71]

• Zhanzhao pushes an "article from WSJ"[72]

• Bargolus pushes "a link to a WSJ article"[73]

• Same objections and POV about the lead of the article.

• Zhanzhao claims that "Actually there is already one section dedicated to the issue of unreported rape.(doh). We could just take that whole para in the lead out rather than have the lead go into grey area by sourcing from opinion pieces."[74]

49.244.254.146 says "Commenting on underreporting is entirely appropriate.."[75]

• Bargolus claims "Having three sentences in the main paragraph stating exactly the same figures that India has the lowest reported rape rate in the world is misleading, because it makes readers think that rape is not a societal problem in India, because it is so low."[76]

• "Revert to old"[77][78]

Made his edit at 2:00 - 3:00,[79] before Human3015 would revert again[80], he asked asked Bgwhite to mostly provide full protection to the article.[81] Then talked to Bgwhite against protection,[82] because Bgwhite had also reverted this version.

Look, why don't you send me your Skype ID and we talk it over in person instead of endless edit warring? Obviously I've landed in the middle of someone else's war and I don't want to get involved in that, but if we Skype about it you can perhaps help clarify for me, what discussions you've already had about this article and point me to those discussions so I'm not repeating something that someone else has already done and argued through?Bargolus (talk) 12:11, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Other socks

TCKTKtool, 72.196.235.154, Resaltador.

• [83][84] and [85][86] (same edit summary)

• 72 says "This article is about Rape in India",[87]

• TCKTKtool says "This article is about Rape in India".[88]

• Zhanzhao says "it IS about rape in india".[89]

• TCKTKtool says "major news around the world".[90]

• Zhanzhao says "news agencies around the world".[91]

• Edit summaries having only a username [92] [93][94] and [95][96][97]

• Resaltador, like Zhanzhao was blocked before for evading his block[98] with 96.231.161.128. This IP that shows same geolocation as 72.196.235.154.

• Zhanzhao says "you're shutting people up everytime they say something",[99]

• Resaltador says that "OccultZone seems to attack anyone that disagrees".[100]

• "forgot to sign"[101][102]
• Creation of 3 words userpage.[103][104]
• Resaltador[105] also types "TALK", like Zhanzhao[106][107] and DanS76.[108]
• "NPOV issues"[109][110]
• "to make it clear"[111][112]
• Capital 't' of "talk"[113][114][115][116]
• "to match".[117][118][119]
• "childish"[120][121][122]
• "This is Wikipedia not.." [123][124]
• Over-usage of slash(/) [125][126]
• Considers others to have been "stalking" him. [127][128]
• Refer articles, publications as 'piece' [129][130][131][132]
• Starts messages with "Hi" [133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140]
• Misuse of the word, "boomerang".[141][142]
• "formatting"[143][144][145]
• "Please do not remove",[146][147] and other "Please do not"s[148][149]
• "wrong section"[150][151]
• Specific identification, "by IP". [152][153][154]
• Misrepresents blocked as banned.[155][156]
• "whitewashing",[157][158][159] doesn't even end here. Zhanzhao had considered the edits on this same section as "an attempt to whitewash"[160] similar to the IP.[161] Wonder if IP went to read a buried conversation just for picking up this word and regard same edits as "whitewashing" like Zhanzhao.
• "headline"[162][163]
• Interest in "Suicide of.." articles[164][165] "court case",[166][167] "outcome",[168][169] "church"[170][171]
• Edit summaries for discussion. [172][173][174][175]

Note that Zhanzhao had admitted to have grasped WP:SOCK#LEGIT in his own words,[176] when he was blocked for evading his block, he also created SPIs[177][178] and since 2010 he was abusing these accounts for socking.