Cannabis Ruderalis

Article
in question
Initial
edit
1st
revert
2nd
revert
3rd
revert
Talk Page
history
Belarus [1] [2] [3] [4] history
Bosnia and Herzegovina [5] [6] [7] [8] history
Croatia [9] [10] [11] - history
Denmark [12] [13] [14] - history
Estonia [15] [16] [17] [18] history
France [19] [20] [21] [22] history
Greece [23] [24] [25] - history
Iceland [26] [27] [28] - history
Lithuania [29] [30] [31] [32] history
Mexico [33] [34] - - history
Netherlands [35] [36] [37] [38] history
PRC [39] [40] - - history
Poland [41] [42] [43] [44] history
Portugal [45] [46] [47] [48] history
Serbia and Montenegro [49] [50] [51] [52] history
Slovenia [53] [54] [55] [56] history

User:Gzornenplatz was blocked today for violations of the arbitration decision (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Gzornenplatz, Kevin Baas, Shorne, VeryVerily/Proposed decision#Enforcement), which says "2) If Gzornenplatz, Shorne, or VeryVerily should revert a page without discussing it on the relevant talk page, an administrator may ban him for up to 24 hours."

As can be seen in the table, Gzornenplatz has been repeatedly removing the country infobox template link, and replacing it with the full text. This has been done carefully at just over 24 hour increments (so as not to break that Arbitration ruling), but he has not discussed these edits on the relevant pages, nor abided by the consensus from many editors that his edits are not wanted, and this effort is creating an extra burden on other users. Rather than being constructive, he continues to push this particular agenda. As such, he is being blocked for one day for each offence listed here, for a total of 56 days. In reality, this only represents a portion of the edits, specifically only those articles he has reverted 2, 3, or 4 times. Many articles have been only reverted once by him in this way. --

Leave a Reply