---
- [1] (starting from You cannot pretend you are an educated and skillful person...) - personal attack on article talk page. This is clearly a personal comment, not just a criticism of something I have written during any discussions.
- [2] unsubstantiated accusation of bad faith (I asked: "do you assume I act in a bad faith?" He responds: Yes).
- [3]. His "explanation" why I act in the bad faith, followed by assertion: That is why you are acting in bad faith. No, I do not.
- [4] (last phrase at the bottom of the diff) - false accusation of misinterpreting a source. The accusation is completely groundless.
- [5] Paul tells: if you see no anti-Semitism in these Solzhenitsyn's words, that tells something about you - reply to this. No, I do not see anti-Semitism in this quotation (last diff). Do you?
- [6] - reply to this. A "troll"? Paul tells: "Nobody claims executions was Berg's own initiative. Obviously, he was doing that [executions of people in gas vans] according to the order of his supervisors. The question was if the construction and usage of gas vans was the order of his supervisors" to justify these edits [7],[8] (see edit summaries). I do not understand what he means. Do you?
Similar behavior with another user: [9] (at the bottom): You are repeatedly adding the text that violates WP:NPOV without properly explaining this addition on the talk page, citing a deliberately wrong reason. Paul tells "deliberately wrong reason". I did not follow much their further exchange, but it resulted in this: [10] ("you accused me of lying"), [11] ("I never accused you of lying, ... You falsely accused me in 1RR violation.")
Additional comments
- That could be just ignored, but Paul continue doing this every day.