Content deleted Content added
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Lieutcoluseng (talk | contribs) Clean up/copyedit |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{merge|Trainband|discuss=Talk:Trainband#Merge proposal|date=February 2024}} |
|||
{{EngvarB|date=September 2020}} |
{{EngvarB|date=September 2020}} |
||
[[File:Trained Bands of London, 1643.jpg|thumb|A member of the [[London Trained Bands]] in 1643]] |
|||
'''Trained Bands''' were companies of part-time [[militia]] in [[England]] and [[Wales]]. Organised by [[county]], they were supposed to drill on a regular basis, although this was rarely the case in practice. The regular army was formed from the Trained Bands in the event of war, though the inability or unwillingness of many of the bands to serve outside of their home regions often left the army short on manpower compared to the paper strength implied by the Trained Bands rolls. |
|||
They later became common in the [[British_America|American colonies]], where they are normally referred to as '''Trainbands'''. Similar organisations include the Dutch [[Schutterij]], and the [[Swiss_Armed_Forces|Swiss militia]], elements of which remain in existence today. |
'''Trained Bands''' were companies of part-time [[militia]] in [[England]] and [[Wales]]. Organised by [[county]], they were supposed to drill on a regular basis, although this was rarely the case in practice. The regular army was formed from the Trained Bands in the event of war, though the inability or unwillingness of many of the bands to serve outside of their home regions often left the army short on manpower compared to the paper strength implied by the Trained Bands rolls. They later became common in the [[British_America|American colonies]], where they are normally referred to as '''Trainbands'''. Similar organisations include the Dutch [[Schutterij]], and the [[Swiss_Armed_Forces|Swiss militia]], elements of which remain in existence today. |
||
==Trained Bands in England and Wales== |
==Trained Bands in England and Wales== |
||
| ⚫ | Founded in 1572, and organised by county, it was not until the 'Exact Militia Programme' of 1625 that they began to have regular training and weapons drill. Even then, standards varied considerably, and depended on the level of financial support by the local gentry. Although [[Charles_I_of_England|Charles I]] tried to assemble armies of around 30,000 militia for the 1639 and 1640 [[Bishops' Wars]], there was considerable reluctance to serve outside their counties, and a proportion were armed only with [[longbow]]s.{{sfn|Braddick|2000|p=194}}<ref>Fissell, Chapter 5.</ref> In 1588, the Trained Bands consisted of 79,798 men, categorized by their primary weapon: 36% arquebusiers, 6% musketeers, 16% bowmen, 26% pikemen, and 16% billmen.<REf>J. Tincey and R. Hook, ''The Armada Campaign'' (1996), p. 47.</ref> |
||
| ⚫ | A standard drill book was issued in February 1638, which was used throughout the 1639 to 1653 [[Wars of the Three Kingdoms]], together with a muster roll by county. This shows large variations in size, equipment and training; the largest was [[Yorkshire]], which had 12,000 men, then [[London]], with 8,000, increased in 1642 to 20,000. Counties like [[Shropshire]] or [[Glamorgan]] had fewer than 500 men.<ref>{{cite web |title=Trained Bands |url=http://wiki.bcw-project.org/trained-band/start |website=BCW Project |access-date=13 March 2020 |archive-date=6 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230606100505/https://wiki.bcw-project.org/trained-band/start |url-status=dead }}</ref> |
||
| ⚫ | Founded in 1572, and organised by county, it was not until the 'Exact Militia Programme' of 1625 that they began to have regular training and weapons drill. Even then, standards varied considerably, and depended on the level of financial support by the local gentry. Although [[Charles_I_of_England|Charles I]] tried to assemble armies of around 30,000 militia for the 1639 and 1640 [[Bishops Wars]], there was considerable reluctance to serve outside their counties, and a proportion were armed only with [[ |
||
| ⚫ | A standard drill book was issued in February 1638, which was used throughout the |
||
In the early stages of the 1642 to 1646 [[First English Civil War]], the Trained Bands provided the bulk of the forces used by both [[Cavalier|Royalists]] and [[Roundhead|Parliamentarians]], but were often unwilling to serve outside their home areas. They were rapidly replaced by more professional bodies, the most important being the [[New Model Army]]. |
In the early stages of the 1642 to 1646 [[First English Civil War]], the Trained Bands provided the bulk of the forces used by both [[Cavalier|Royalists]] and [[Roundhead|Parliamentarians]], but were often unwilling to serve outside their home areas. They were rapidly replaced by more professional bodies, the most important being the [[New Model Army]]. |
||
==American train bands== |
==American train bands== |
||
In the early American colonies the trained band was the most basic tactical unit.<ref name=" |
In the early American colonies the trained band was the most basic tactical unit.<ref name="Library">{{Cite web |title=Sample text for Library of Congress control number 94005199 |url=https://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/simon052/94005199.html |access-date=2023-08-30 |website=catdir.loc.gov}}</ref> However, no standard company size existed and variations were wide. As population grew these companies were organised into regiments to allow better management.<ref name="M&M1984">Allan R. Millett and Peter Maslowski: ''For the common defense: A military history of the United States of America'', New York: Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan, 1984, Library of Congress bibliographic record, http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/simon052/94005199.html, last accessed 27 Oct 2018: "Although the basic tactical unit in all the colonies was the company, or trainband, regional variations and changes over time were as important as the superficial uniformity. No standardized company size existed, some companies containing as few as sixty-five men and others as many as two hundred. Some trainbands elected their officers, but in others the governors appointed them. Southern colonies, with widely dispersed populations, often organized companies on a countywide basis, while in New England, with its towns and villages, individual communities contained their own trainbands. As populations increased and the number of trainbands grew, colonies organized companies into regiments to preserve efficient management."</ref> But trainbands were not combat units. Generally, upon reaching a certain age a man was required to join the local trainband in which he received periodic training for the next couple of decades. In wartime, [[Provincial troops in the French and Indian Wars|military forces were formed by selecting men from trainbands on an individual basis and then forming them into a fighting unit]]. |
||
The exact derivation and usage is not clear. |
The exact derivation and usage is not clear. A nineteenth-century dictionary says, under "Train": |
||
{{Quotation|train-band, i.e. train'd band, a band of trained men, Cowper, John Gilpin, st. I, and used by Dryden and Clarendon (Todd)|''Skeat's Etymological Dictionary of the English Language'' (Oxford 1879)<ref name="WWS">Walter W. Skeat: ''An Etymological Dictionary of the English Language'', Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, N.Y., an unabridged republication of the work originally published in 1910, p. 658, https://books.google.com/books?id=jeeGAAAAQBAJ&q=Train-band#v=snippet&q=Train-band&f=false, last accessed 27 Oct 2018.</ref>}} |
{{Quotation|train-band, i.e. train'd band, a band of trained men, Cowper, John Gilpin, st. I, and used by Dryden and Clarendon (Todd)|''Skeat's Etymological Dictionary of the English Language'' (Oxford 1879)<ref name="WWS">Walter W. Skeat: ''An Etymological Dictionary of the English Language'', Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, N.Y., an unabridged republication of the work originally published in 1910, p. 658, https://books.google.com/books?id=jeeGAAAAQBAJ&q=Train-band#v=snippet&q=Train-band&f=false, last accessed 27 Oct 2018.</ref>}} |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
The issue is whether the men "received training" in the modern sense, or whether they were "in the train" or retinue or were otherwise organised around a [[train (military)|military "train"]] as in horse-drawn artillery. |
The issue is whether the men "received training" in the modern sense, or whether they were "in the train" or retinue or were otherwise organised around a [[train (military)|military "train"]] as in horse-drawn artillery. |
||
In the 17th century [[New England]] colonial militia units were usually referred to as "train bands" or, sometimes, "trained bands".<ref name="CJH"> |
In the 17th century [[New England]] colonial militia units were usually referred to as "train bands" or, sometimes, "trained bands".<ref name="CJH">{{Cite book |last=Connecticut |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uWhKAAAAYAAJ&q=%22trainband%22,&pg=PA267 |title=The Public Records of the State of Connecticut ... with the Journal of the Council of Safety ... and an Appendix: Pub. in Accordance with a Resolution of the General Assembly, by Charles J. Hoadly |date=1894 |publisher=Case, Lockwood & Brainard Company |language=en}}</ref> Typically, each town would elect three officers to lead its train band with the ranks of captain, lieutenant and ensign. As the populations of towns varied widely, larger towns usually had more than one train band. In the middle of the 1600s train bands began to be referred to as companies. |
||
On December 13, 1636 the Massachusetts Militia was organised into three regiments - North, South and East. As there are National Guard units descendants of these regiments, this date is used as the "birthday" of the [[National Guard of the United States|National Guard]], despite the fact that citizen militias in the American Colonies date back to the [[Jamestown, Virginia|Jamestown settlement]] in 1607. |
On December 13, 1636 the Massachusetts Militia was organised into three regiments - North, South and East. As there are National Guard units descendants of these regiments, this date is used as the "birthday" of the [[National Guard of the United States|National Guard]], despite the fact that citizen militias in the American Colonies date back to the [[Jamestown, Virginia|Jamestown settlement]] in 1607. |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
* {{cite web |title=Trained Bands |url=http://wiki.bcw-project.org/trained-band/start |website=BCW Project |access-date=13 March 2020}} |
* {{cite web |title=Trained Bands |url=http://wiki.bcw-project.org/trained-band/start |website=BCW Project |access-date=13 March 2020 |archive-date=6 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230606100505/https://wiki.bcw-project.org/trained-band/start |url-status=dead }} |
||
{{Portal bar|British Empire}} |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
[[Category:Infantry units and formations]] |
[[Category:Infantry units and formations]] |
||
[[Category:Militia |
[[Category:Militia of England]] |
||
[[Category:Militia of the United |
[[Category:Militia of the United States]] |
||
Latest revision as of 20:21, 20 February 2024
Trained Bands were companies of part-time militia in England and Wales. Organised by county, they were supposed to drill on a regular basis, although this was rarely the case in practice. The regular army was formed from the Trained Bands in the event of war, though the inability or unwillingness of many of the bands to serve outside of their home regions often left the army short on manpower compared to the paper strength implied by the Trained Bands rolls. They later became common in the American colonies, where they are normally referred to as Trainbands. Similar organisations include the Dutch Schutterij, and the Swiss militia, elements of which remain in existence today.
Trained Bands in England and Wales[edit]
Founded in 1572, and organised by county, it was not until the 'Exact Militia Programme' of 1625 that they began to have regular training and weapons drill. Even then, standards varied considerably, and depended on the level of financial support by the local gentry. Although Charles I tried to assemble armies of around 30,000 militia for the 1639 and 1640 Bishops' Wars, there was considerable reluctance to serve outside their counties, and a proportion were armed only with longbows.[1][2] In 1588, the Trained Bands consisted of 79,798 men, categorized by their primary weapon: 36% arquebusiers, 6% musketeers, 16% bowmen, 26% pikemen, and 16% billmen.[3]
A standard drill book was issued in February 1638, which was used throughout the 1639 to 1653 Wars of the Three Kingdoms, together with a muster roll by county. This shows large variations in size, equipment and training; the largest was Yorkshire, which had 12,000 men, then London, with 8,000, increased in 1642 to 20,000. Counties like Shropshire or Glamorgan had fewer than 500 men.[4]
In the early stages of the 1642 to 1646 First English Civil War, the Trained Bands provided the bulk of the forces used by both Royalists and Parliamentarians, but were often unwilling to serve outside their home areas. They were rapidly replaced by more professional bodies, the most important being the New Model Army.
American train bands[edit]
In the early American colonies the trained band was the most basic tactical unit.[5] However, no standard company size existed and variations were wide. As population grew these companies were organised into regiments to allow better management.[6] But trainbands were not combat units. Generally, upon reaching a certain age a man was required to join the local trainband in which he received periodic training for the next couple of decades. In wartime, military forces were formed by selecting men from trainbands on an individual basis and then forming them into a fighting unit.
The exact derivation and usage is not clear. A nineteenth-century dictionary says, under "Train":
train-band, i.e. train'd band, a band of trained men, Cowper, John Gilpin, st. I, and used by Dryden and Clarendon (Todd)
— Skeat's Etymological Dictionary of the English Language (Oxford 1879)[7]
The issue is whether the men "received training" in the modern sense, or whether they were "in the train" or retinue or were otherwise organised around a military "train" as in horse-drawn artillery.
In the 17th century New England colonial militia units were usually referred to as "train bands" or, sometimes, "trained bands".[8] Typically, each town would elect three officers to lead its train band with the ranks of captain, lieutenant and ensign. As the populations of towns varied widely, larger towns usually had more than one train band. In the middle of the 1600s train bands began to be referred to as companies.
On December 13, 1636 the Massachusetts Militia was organised into three regiments - North, South and East. As there are National Guard units descendants of these regiments, this date is used as the "birthday" of the National Guard, despite the fact that citizen militias in the American Colonies date back to the Jamestown settlement in 1607.
References[edit]
- ^ Braddick 2000, p. 194.
- ^ Fissell, Chapter 5.
- ^ J. Tincey and R. Hook, The Armada Campaign (1996), p. 47.
- ^ "Trained Bands". BCW Project. Archived from the original on 6 June 2023. Retrieved 13 March 2020.
- ^ "Sample text for Library of Congress control number 94005199". catdir.loc.gov. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
- ^ Allan R. Millett and Peter Maslowski: For the common defense: A military history of the United States of America, New York: Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan, 1984, Library of Congress bibliographic record, http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/simon052/94005199.html, last accessed 27 Oct 2018: "Although the basic tactical unit in all the colonies was the company, or trainband, regional variations and changes over time were as important as the superficial uniformity. No standardized company size existed, some companies containing as few as sixty-five men and others as many as two hundred. Some trainbands elected their officers, but in others the governors appointed them. Southern colonies, with widely dispersed populations, often organized companies on a countywide basis, while in New England, with its towns and villages, individual communities contained their own trainbands. As populations increased and the number of trainbands grew, colonies organized companies into regiments to preserve efficient management."
- ^ Walter W. Skeat: An Etymological Dictionary of the English Language, Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, N.Y., an unabridged republication of the work originally published in 1910, p. 658, https://books.google.com/books?id=jeeGAAAAQBAJ&q=Train-band#v=snippet&q=Train-band&f=false, last accessed 27 Oct 2018.
- ^ Connecticut (1894). The Public Records of the State of Connecticut ... with the Journal of the Council of Safety ... and an Appendix: Pub. in Accordance with a Resolution of the General Assembly, by Charles J. Hoadly. Case, Lockwood & Brainard Company.
Sources[edit]
- Braddick, Michael (2000). State Formation in Early Modern England, C.1550-1700. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521783460.
- Mark Charles Fissell, The Bishops' Wars: Charles I's campaigns against Scotland 1638–1640, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, ISBN 0-521-34520-0.
- Harris, Tim (2014). Rebellion: Britain's First Stuart Kings, 1567-1642. OUP. ISBN 978-0199209002.
- Warton, Jonathan (April 1997). "Ludlow's Trained Band: A Study of Militiamen in Early Stuart England". Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research. 91 (365): 86–102. JSTOR 44232985.
External links[edit]
- "Trained Bands". BCW Project. Archived from the original on 6 June 2023. Retrieved 13 March 2020.
