Merge
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Merge, an attempt to reduce the articles to be merged backlog and improve the merging process. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MergeWikipedia:WikiProject MergeTemplate:WikiProject MergeMerge articles

Archives

Related archived pages: Voting archive "Mergewith" (superseded) discussion archive

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

This talk page is for the discussion of the following templates:

• {{Merge}}
• {{Merge to}}
• {{Merge from}}
• {{Merging}}

Please be clear in your comments which template you are referring to.

Only some of these templates have been protected. But since these templates should work similarly, please discuss any changes on this talk page first. Any user can edit the documentation, add interwikis and categories, since as usual the /doc sub-pages are not protected.

==Preposition to merge an item==

It appears that the article List of Lithuanian monarchs (Wikipedia item ID: Q111379094), along with its counterpart in French, should be merged with another set of articles (Wikipedia item ID: Q2639920) where currently an article in English does not exist. --SeriousThinker (talk) 13:09, 17 August 2022 (UTC) SeriousThinker (talk) 10:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the template {{Merge}}. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:24, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) There is a redirect, Grand Duke of Lithuania, here in the English Wikipedia, so there is no need to merge. If there is material from another-language Wikipedia with which to create the Grand Duke article here that might be a good way to go. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^put'r there 14:31, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Description of suggested change: make the example something normal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael21107 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? You'll need to be much more specific about what exactly you want changed for this to get implemented. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:40, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the example says ''a page that has not been specified. If you are the editor who added this template, please specify.''...would be good to have it a normal example Michael H (talk) 19:12, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The example at the top is exactly what the template renders as when given no parameters. This is standard practice in template namespace and should not be changed without a good reason. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:37, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

apologies for not signing, i forget Michael H (talk) 19:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By default, {{Merge to}} produces output that reads "([[|Discuss]])" if you don't specify a |discuss= value; {{Merge from}} doesn't have this issue. I'm guessing that we should have them do the same thing. I would surmise that the best thing to do in both cases (though it might use different code in the two templates) is include a link to the talk page of the merge-to target, since that is the default location to discuss any merge.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This whole family of templates are unhelpfully displaying "Proposed since {{{date}}}.", when no |date= value has been specified. This entire item should probably just be suppressed in such a case (and a bot will date-fix it later anyway; there's no reason for it to be ugly and confusing in the short interim).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]