Woodensuperman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Woodensuperman (talk | contribs) Undid revision 542389100 by Robsinden (talk) |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
This section needs clarification; Is it as I believe for content editor of news/political programmes such as [[Panorama (TV series)|Panorama]] and [[Newsnight]] or as many seem to think for film editors. If it is film editors surely it should be after director of photography. Comments please. [[User:REVUpminster|REVUpminster]] ([[User talk:REVUpminster|talk]]) 18:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC) |
This section needs clarification; Is it as I believe for content editor of news/political programmes such as [[Panorama (TV series)|Panorama]] and [[Newsnight]] or as many seem to think for film editors. If it is film editors surely it should be after director of photography. Comments please. [[User:REVUpminster|REVUpminster]] ([[User talk:REVUpminster|talk]]) 18:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
{{edit protected}} |
Revision as of 16:08, 6 March 2013
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Television Template‑class | ||||||
|
Index
|
|||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Edit request on 30 January 2013
I was thinking that the template should say "Original language(s)," not just "Languages" to be clearer, or to stop readers from thinking that the series/movie got dubbed when it really didn't. That should help.
166.137.100.42 (talk) 05:03, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- What specific change are you proposing? Ruslik_Zero 18:39, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Done, seems straightforward enough. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:03, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Head writer
Back in 2006, there was a brief discussion about having head_writer as a parameter, at a time when there wasn't a writer parameter. It didn't get much discussion back then, but since its easy to find nearly 400 uses of "head writer" in existing articles, and over 170,000 hits for the term on IMDb, I'd like to get feedback from some of the 117 editors interested in this template as to whether you think adding "head writer" would be an good idea. Thanks in advance — 68.165.77.155 (talk) 11:00, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Editor
This section needs clarification; Is it as I believe for content editor of news/political programmes such as Panorama and Newsnight or as many seem to think for film editors. If it is film editors surely it should be after director of photography. Comments please. REVUpminster (talk) 18:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC)