Cannabis Ruderalis

ITM Power

  • ... that ITM Power's profits increased 60-fold between the fiscal year of 2010-11 and the fiscal year of 2011-12?

Created/expanded by W.D. (talk), Theopolisme (talk), Dru of Id (talk). Nominated by W.D. (talk) at 15:52, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Article contains a {{notability}} template at the top. I don't think that it meets WP:CORP. I also think that the prose needs work done, even in the first sentence: "founded in June 2004." Also "Million" should not be capitalised. That's just in the lead. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
AFD is going on. --Redtigerxyz Talk 19:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Needs a review now that it's been kept. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:30, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • I did some minor MOS clean-up but I came across one discrepancy that I would like to see some clarity on. In the lead, and backed by reference footnote #2, it says that the company was founded in 2004. In the history section, and backed by a source behind a paywall in footnote #4, it says that it was "created" in 2001. It also has the 2001 date in the infobox. I know you could play semantics between founded/created (is the "creation" date when the company was first thought up and the founding being the date of incorporation?) but I think at the very least this should be clarified in the article. I'm also wondering if this is the most "punchiest" hook that could be taken from the article? Sure a 60-fold increase in profit margin might excite a stock broker but would it intrigue the average reader as much? I know it is hard to make a topic like fuel cells "sexy" but, for me personally, I thought that facts like ITM being the first UK-based fuel cell company to go public or the plan to make the Isle of Wight completely carbon neutral were a little more eye-catching. AgneCheese/Wine 20:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
    • Thanks. I have full access to the source behind the paywall which says The Cambridge-based company was formed in June 2001... Their company history only starts at 2004, but doesn't actually say when the company was founded. I'll try and look for more sources to figure out which one is right. Legoktm (talk) 02:41, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Leave a Reply