Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
→‎Clutter: new section
(400 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{ArticleHistory
{{Article history
|action1=PR
|action1=PR
|action1date=21:11, 21 February 2007
|action1date=21:11, 21 February 2007
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Uranium
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Uranium/archive1
|action1result=reviewed
|action1result=reviewed
|action1oldid=109812699
|action1oldid=109812699

|action2=FAC
|action2=FAC
|action2date=03:45, 3 March 2007
|action2date=03:45, 3 March 2007
Line 10: Line 12:
|action2result=promoted
|action2result=promoted
|action2oldid=112241714
|action2oldid=112241714

|action3=GTC
|action3date=21:07, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Actinides/archive1
|action3result=promoted

|action4 = FAR
|action4date = 2023-08-05
|action4link = Wikipedia:Featured article review/Uranium/archive1
|action4result = demoted
|action4oldid = 1167622681

|action5 = GTR
|action5date = 09:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
|action5link = Wikipedia:Featured topic removal candidates/Actinide/archive1
|action5result = Removed

|maindate=March 19, 2007
|maindate=March 19, 2007
|currentstatus=FA
|currentstatus=FFA
}}
}}
{{afd-merged-from|Uranium pentaiodide|Uranium pentaiodide|4 June 2021}}
{{WikiProjectBanners
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|1=
|1={{physics|class=FA|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Elements|importance=Top|1=old-peer-review|vital=yes}}
|2={{Chemical Element|class=FA|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Physics|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Mining|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Energy|importance=High|auto=yes}}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{WPCD}}
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 2
|minthreadsleft = 5
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(730d)
|archive = Talk:Uranium/Archive %(counter)d
}}

== Atomic weight should be 238.028906 ±0.00027, not 238.02891 ±0.0003 ==

We reproduce a rounded figure here from the 2013 CIAAW report, but the 2000 report (https://www.ciaaw.org/pubs/EXER-2000.pdf) included a more precise figure before rounding. I tried to edit the underlying wikidata entry but do not see the changes reflected here. [[User:Anomalistic|Anomalistic]] ([[User talk:Anomalistic|talk]]) 16:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)


== Physics ==
Article changed over to new [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements]] format by contributors to [[/Temp]] and [[User:Maveric149|mav]] 11:18, 9 Jan 2004 (UTC). Elementbox converted 10:57, 17 July 2005 by [[User:Femto|Femto]] (previous revision was that of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uranium&oldid=18858888 02:00, 15 July 2005]).


Gy [[User:Abeeb olasupo|Abeeb olasupo]] ([[User talk:Abeeb olasupo|talk]]) 19:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
{{Archive box|* [[Talk:Uranium/Archive 1|Archive 1]]}}


==Reference==
== Physics ==
{{cite journal
| title = Depleted and natural uranium: chemistry and toxicological effects
| author = E. S. Craft, A. W. Abu-Qare, M. M. Flaherty, M. C. Garofolo, H. L. Rincavage, M. B. Abou-Donia
| journal = Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B: Critical Reviews
| year = 2004
| volume = 7
| issue = 4
| pages = 297 - 317
| doi = 10.1080/10937400490452714}} would be a good reference.--[[User:Stone|Stone]] 15:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


Which metal is used for containers that store radioactive sources? Answer in words not symbols. [[User:Abeeb olasupo|Abeeb olasupo]] ([[User talk:Abeeb olasupo|talk]]) 19:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
== Nitride ==


:Lead storage containers can be used to store and transport radioactive material. The standard outside and inside finishing is coated lead so there is no exposure to the lead by personnel. A stainless steel finishing is also available to provide a stronger housing. [[User:Rawsar6|Rawsar6]] ([[User talk:Rawsar6|talk]]) 22:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Please create an article for [[uranium nitride]]. N<sub>2</sub> reacts with U at 700 K, forming UN and UN<sub>2</sub> [[nitride]]s per [http://bovik.org/du/scans/Cotton126.jpg Cotton, Simon (1991) Lanthanides and Actinides. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 126.] [[User:64.0.232.39|64.0.232.39]] 05:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC) [[User:75.18.210.218|75.18.210.218]] 18:32, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
:Except some people in the production of nuclear fuel this type of chemical is simply not used and therefor nobody started one.--[[User:Stone|Stone]] 07:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


==Answers.com?==
:That reaction is important because it takes place in uranium combustion in air. Here is what [http://www.webelements.com/webelements/compounds/text/U/N3U2-12033839.html WebElements] says:
What is with the references being answer.com? Seems cheesy and is rather indirect.
; uranium nitride
* Formula: U<sub>2</sub>N<sub>3</sub>
* CAS registry number: [12033-83-9]
* Formula weight: 518.078
* Synonyms: uranium nitride, diuranium trinitride
* Colour: dark grey
* Appearance: crystalline solid
* Melting point: 900°C (decomposes to UN)
* Density: 11300 kg m<sup>-3</sup>
''[[User:Nrcprm2026|James S.]]'' 08:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
::*{{cite journal
| title = Fabrication and testing of uranium nitridenext term fuel for space power reactors
| author = R. B. Matthews, K. M. Chidester, C. W. Hoth, R. E. Mason, R. L. Petty
| journal = Journal of Nuclear Materials
| volume = 151
| issue = 3
| year = 1988
| pages = 345
| doi = 10.1016/0022-3115(88)90029-3}} --[[User:Stone|Stone]] 11:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
::* {{DOI|doi:10.1016/0022-3115(63)90115-6}}-[[User:Stone|Stone]] 11:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


== Some points on the article ==


Uranium metal reacts with almost all non-metal elements (with the exception of the [[noble gas]]es) and their [[chemical compound|compounds]], with reactivity increasing with temperature.{{cite encyclopedia|title=uranium|encyclopedia=Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia|url=http://'''www.answers.com'''/uranium|publisher=Columbia University Press|edition=6th|access-date=27 September 2008|archive-date=27 July 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110727194715/http://'''www.answers.com'''/uranium|url-status=dead}}
Well done to mav and the other editors for getting this article to Featured Article Status. <br>
The following was posted on a different page (that is now archived and no replies to the points below were posted) and I'm posting here so people can comment on the points:<br>
[[Uranium#Production and reserves|Production and reserves]] section.
* ''Three million metric ton of uranium ore reserves are known to exist and an additional five billion metric ton of uranium are estimated to be in sea water''
:Both of these statistics need sources.
:There would be more than 3Mt of uranium ore reserves – Olympic Dam alone has 761Mt @ 0.6kg/t U3O8. [http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/ourBusinesses/baseMetals/olympicDam.jsp]
:It would be more like 3Mt of mineable U3O8 is known to exist. I don’t think you’ll find a figure for straight uranium.<br>
*Consider changing metric ton to just tonne through out the article. Ton is used for imperial units throughout the article and it would be more readable for metric users to see ‘tonne’.
*''Yellowcake is then generally further refined using nitric acid to create a solution of uranyl nitrate.''
:For this general discussion the step to uranyl nitrate can be skipped and mention of uranium hexafluoride should be mentioned instead.
*I don’t think the picture comment ‘to extract pure uranium’ is what is generally done. Uranium is mainly used as [[Uranium dioxide]] in nuclear reactors. Also 'yellowcake' is not generally the colour in the picture anymore (see below and [[yellowcake]]). I do appreciate that there are few pictures out there but maybe you could change the comment to reflect that this is an historic picture of yellowcake.
*“The resulting mixture, called yellowcake, contains..”. It would be more correct to use “the resulting mixture is U3O8 and is commonly called yellowcake…” The powdered form is not yellow [http://www.riotinto.com/library/reviewmagazine/72/article6-5.aspx], Australia’s second largest producer doesn’t use the term yellowcake [http://www.google.com.au/search?as_q=yellowcake&hl=en&num=50&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=www.bhpbilliton.com&as_rights=&safe=images], their largest producer uses it only once [http://www.google.com.au/search?num=50&hl=en&as_qdr=all&q=yellowcake+site%3Awww.riotinto.com&btnG=Search&meta=], and the worlds largest producer uses the term U3O8 [http://www.google.com.au/search?num=50&hl=en&as_qdr=all&q=u3o8+site%3Awww.cameco.com&btnG=Search&meta=] more than yellowcake [http://www.google.com.au/search?num=50&hl=en&as_qdr=all&q=yellowcake+site%3Awww.cameco.com&meta=].
:And [[Uranium mining]] makes no mention of yellowcake. I guess my point on this one is that general public usage is 'yellowcake' however the mining companies that produce the oxide (where you can go for more info) use U3O8. The section also uses yellowcake and ‘concentrated uranium oxides’ interchangeably when they are describing the same thing - it could be confusing.


As little as {{cvt|15|lb}} of uranium-235 can be used to make an atomic bomb.{{cite encyclopedia|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Espionage, Intelligence, and Security|publisher=The Gale Group, Inc.|title=uranium|url=http://'''www.answers.com'''/uranium|access-date=27 September 2008|archive-date=27 July 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110727194715/http://www.answers.com/uranium|url-status=dead}}
In reference to the [[Uranium#Cold War legacy and waste|Cold War legacy and waste]] section, it would be useful to have a sentence on the use of dismantled nuclear warheads for nuclear fuel for power stations. [http://www.ne.doe.gov/pdfFiles/HEUAgreement2001.pdf] [[Megatons to Megawatts Program]]<br>


He named the newly discovered element after the planet [[Uranus]] (named after the primordial [[Uranus (mythology)|Greek god of the sky]]), which had been discovered eight years earlier by [[William Herschel]].{{cite encyclopedia|edition=4th|title=Uranium|encyclopedia=The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language|publisher=Houghton Mifflin Company|url=http://'''www.answers.com'''/uranium|access-date=15 January 2007|archive-date=27 July 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110727194715/http://'''www.answers.com'''/uranium|url-status=dead}}
For the [[Uranium#Biotic and abiotic|Biotic and abiotic]] section:<br>
--[[User:Smokefoot|Smokefoot]] ([[User talk:Smokefoot|talk]]) 17:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
*Do we need the sub heading ‘[[Biotic]] and [[abiotic]]’. If so can we mention in the next paragraph which one it is or link to the words some how? I didn’t know what they were – more encompassing words for organic and inorganic? I’ve only checked [[lead]] and [[potassium]] and there is no similar sub headings. Can we remove?
*In reference to ''Its average concentration in the Earth's crust is (depending on the reference) 2 to 4 parts per million'' do those references really say ''Earth’s crust''. Most reference on the net have ‘Uranium occurs in ''rocks'' in concentrations of 2 to 4 ppm’ [http://www.british-energy.com/opendocument.php?did=536]. If it says rocks in the reference can we change it to the previous sentence. If it is crust then a number closer to 4 maybe correct. [[Crust (geology)|crust]] is made up mainly of basalt (0.5ppm) and granite (4ppm) [http://www.energyscience.org.au/FS03%20Nucl%20Power%20Clmt%20Chng.pdf] [http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=300650&gsessionid=2VQkBqUCSNQ], 4ppm could be reasonable as [[basalt]] is more associated with the earths surface. The 2ppm most likely is a reference to Uranium in soils. Greater than 2.5ppm is ‘high uranium concentrations’ [http://energy.cr.usgs.gov/radon/midwest2.html]. US studies indicate that fertilised soils have 0.8 to 1.2ppm [http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/papers/uranium_and_sulfur/uranium.html] and [http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/papers/uranium_and_sulfur/results_discuss.html]. And I like the quality [http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Features/DU/du_qaa.shtml] of sites when I run 2ppm [http://www.google.com.au/search?num=50&hl=en&q=uranium+%222+parts+per+million%22&meta=] in google compared to 4ppm [http://www.google.com.au/search?num=50&hl=en&q=uranium+%224+parts+per+million%22&meta=] when looking at soils. So can we remove ‘depending on the reference’ and match the correct words with the correct numbers.
*''(it is recovered commercially from these sources with as little as 0.1% uranium[9]).'' This should be ''with less than 0.1% uranium''. Olympic Dam is mining at 0.6kg/t (0.06%) of U3O8 and if uranium makes up 81% of this compound by weight then they are mining at about 0.05% uranium. This is due to the uranium being a by product (although these days it’s more a co-product) but the life of Olympic Dam will make this statement correct for as long as most of us are alive.
Thanks - [[User:Ctbolt|Ctbolt]] 06:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
::It might also be good for someone to double-check the cited sources. One especially suspicious-looking "fact" (which I deleted) claimed that Israel had one or more above-ground nuclear tests that caused pollution. A reliable source for this would contradict [[Israel and weapons of mass destruction]] and [[Vela Incident]], and indeed, neither Israel nor France (the other country mentioned) is in the "Uranium" section of ''Building Blocks''. Other errors in fact or attribution might be less obvious but just as serious. [[User:Calbaer|Calbaer]] 22:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
:::That is no error of attribution; Look at the last paragraph of page 480 of the Emsley reference and look at note 187 on the same page. The note says "Some countries, such as France and Israel, continued above-ground tests in the 1970s and 1980s." Also, removing all mention of nuclear testing from that section was not the greatest way to deal with seeing the odd-looking fact. A better way of dealing with that would have been to comment out 'and Israel' and bring the issue to the talk page (something I did after restoring the removed text). Even books written by a PhD in chemistry and published by Oxford Press can be wrong, however. So if that is the case, then lets work it out here. Hopefully, this is rare error for the reference; I've already had to junk another book-o-elements due to it being filled with incorrect facts (avoid Krebs ''The History and Use of Our Earth's Chemical Elements'' - it is worse than useless). --[[User:Maveric149|mav]] 01:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
* [[commons:File:Nuclear Power Plant 2.jpg|Nuclear Power Plant 2.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2023-03-25T22:44:09.113725 | Nuclear Power Plant 2.jpg -->
::Sorry; I read the main text and missed the footnote. Hopefully it is a rare error, but it is a glaring one. I don't know of any other source (this side of conspiracy theorists) who claim that above-ground Israeli nuclear tests are a fact rather than a conjecture or falsehood. [[User:Calbaer|Calbaer]] 19:42, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nuclear Power Plant 2.jpg|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 22:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
:Thanks for all the great feedback Ctbolt! Truth is, I'm going to work on some geology articles for a while and won't get back to this article for at least a month. But I do plan to address each of your points and then put the article through another peer review. I do invite anybody and everybody else interested to beat me to it though. :) --[[User:Maveric149|mav]] 01:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2023 ==


{{Edit semi-protected|Uranium|answered=yes}}
urainum is found in most cheeses [[Special:Contributions/86.13.252.226|86.13.252.226]] ([[User talk:86.13.252.226|talk]]) 11:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Actualcpscm|Actualcpscm]] ([[User talk:Actualcpscm|talk]]) 11:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)


"...and poses significant health threat and environmental impact." should be "...and poses a significant health threat..." or "...and poses significant health threats..." <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:YSWEISS|YSWEISS]] ([[User talk:YSWEISS#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/YSWEISS|contribs]]) 15:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== LOCK THE PAGE ==
Serious vandalism. Please lock and remove vile photo--[[User:Diablorex|Diablorex]] 02:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)


"...The development and deployment of these nuclear reactors continue on a global base as they are powerful sources of CO2-free energy." Should be "The development and deployment of these nuclear reactors continue on a global base as they are powerful sources energy." The fuel cycle of nuclear plants is not CO2-free. Mining, enrichment, and disposal are high CO2 pollutants. Only the operating part of the cycle is free of CO2 emissions. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:1C0:6701:C850:DF0C:A1ED:F89C:E4BC|2601:1C0:6701:C850:DF0C:A1ED:F89C:E4BC]] ([[User talk:2601:1C0:6701:C850:DF0C:A1ED:F89C:E4BC#top|talk]]) 21:48, 10 September 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I agree I was plesently disgusted when i open the link.


== Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2023 ==
== Floating shock image ==


{{edit semi-protected|Uranium|answered=yes}}
There's a shock image being superimposed. I suspect it's from a template - could somebody fix it? <font color="blue">-[[User:Wooty|'''Wo''']][[User:Wooty/b|'''''o''''']][[User:Wooty/Avoid presenting Wikipedia as anything but an encyclopedia|'''ty''']]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Wooty|'''Woot?''']]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Wooty|'''contribs''']]</small></font> 02:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
The final sentence in the first paragraph states that uranium can be eaten and is an extremely dense source of calories. This is patently false; uranium is toxic, the energy referred to here is the energy released upon fission and hence not usable by the human body, and the citation used says little if anything to support the statement. Please remove the sentence entirely. [[Special:Contributions/82.0.251.175|82.0.251.175]] ([[User talk:82.0.251.175|talk]]) 13:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
:{{already done}} by {{u|Praseodymium-141}}; thanks for pointing this out. <sup>[[User:ComplexRational|'''<span style="color:#0039a6">Complex</span>''']]</sup>/<sub>[[User talk:ComplexRational|'''<span style="color:#000000">Rational</span>''']]</sub> 13:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)


== Clutter ==
wow someone got rid of it pretty fast


In the article "[[Isotopes of uranium]]", i edited out an astonishing amount of unnecessary verbiage, particularly from the section "Uranium-234". Okay? [[User:Solomonfromfinland|Solomonfromfinland]] ([[User talk:Solomonfromfinland|talk]]) 05:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
:It's not permanently removed. I removed the template (or templates), it was being transcluded from. When the templates are fixed, please revert. <font color="blue">-[[User:Wooty|'''Wo''']][[User:Wooty/b|'''''o''''']][[User:Wooty/Avoid presenting Wikipedia as anything but an encyclopedia|'''ty''']]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Wooty|'''Woot?''']]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Wooty|'''contribs''']]</small></font> 02:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
::The image has been deleted but I still don't know which of the many templates is affected. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 02:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
:::yeah, on another note, this article still needs to be locked. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/71.240.228.111|71.240.228.111]] ([[User talk:71.240.228.111|talk]]) 02:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
:::All of them have been removed. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Alexneu0 contribs of user that added them]. We don't protect main page articles, either. <font color="blue">-[[User:Wooty|'''Wo''']][[User:Wooty/b|'''''o''''']][[User:Wooty/Avoid presenting Wikipedia as anything but an encyclopedia|'''ty''']]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Wooty|'''Woot?''']]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Wooty|'''contribs''']]</small></font> 02:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
::::Why does this article need over 40 templates anyway? <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 02:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
:::::It doesn't, really. Why is it using a ton of templates for element boxes when it could be much easier to put them all into one and use series=, blah blah blah? <font color="blue">-[[User:Wooty|'''Wo''']][[User:Wooty/b|'''''o''''']][[User:Wooty/Avoid presenting Wikipedia as anything but an encyclopedia|'''ty''']]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Wooty|'''Woot?''']]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Wooty|'''contribs''']]</small></font> 02:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
::::::Exactly- I'll ask someone who's good with templates if they can narrow down to needing just one template (or at least only a few). <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 02:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
:::::There's a single template called [[Template:Elementbox]] (but it doesn't contain every parameter included in these 40 or so templates), and I've noticed an inconsistency in the chemical element articles on infobox usage. +[[User:A.Ou|A.0u]] 02:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
:::::FYI, here's a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Elements#Elementbox_infobox_templates|listing of elementbox infobox templates]]. +[[User:A.Ou|A.0u]] 02:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:54, 29 March 2024

Former featured articleUranium is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 19, 2007.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 21, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
March 3, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
September 29, 2014Good topic candidatePromoted
August 5, 2023Featured article reviewDemoted
February 15, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Atomic weight should be 238.028906 ±0.00027, not 238.02891 ±0.0003

We reproduce a rounded figure here from the 2013 CIAAW report, but the 2000 report (https://www.ciaaw.org/pubs/EXER-2000.pdf) included a more precise figure before rounding. I tried to edit the underlying wikidata entry but do not see the changes reflected here. Anomalistic (talk) 16:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Physics

Gy Abeeb olasupo (talk) 19:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Physics

Which metal is used for containers that store radioactive sources? Answer in words not symbols. Abeeb olasupo (talk) 19:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lead storage containers can be used to store and transport radioactive material. The standard outside and inside finishing is coated lead so there is no exposure to the lead by personnel. A stainless steel finishing is also available to provide a stronger housing. Rawsar6 (talk) 22:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Answers.com?

What is with the references being answer.com? Seems cheesy and is rather indirect.


Uranium metal reacts with almost all non-metal elements (with the exception of the noble gases) and their compounds, with reactivity increasing with temperature.www.answers.com/uranium "uranium". Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia (6th ed.). Columbia University Press. Archived from [http://www.answers.com/uranium the original] on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 27 September 2008. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Check |url= value (help)

As little as 15 lb (6.8 kg) of uranium-235 can be used to make an atomic bomb."uranium". Encyclopedia of Espionage, Intelligence, and Security. The Gale Group, Inc. Archived from [http://www.answers.com/uranium the original] on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 27 September 2008. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Check |url= value (help)

He named the newly discovered element after the planet Uranus (named after the primordial Greek god of the sky), which had been discovered eight years earlier by William Herschel.www.answers.com/uranium "Uranium". The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th ed.). Houghton Mifflin Company. Archived from [http://www.answers.com/uranium the original] on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 15 January 2007. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Check |url= value (help) --Smokefoot (talk) 17:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2023

urainum is found in most cheeses 86.13.252.226 (talk) 11:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"...and poses significant health threat and environmental impact." should be "...and poses a significant health threat..." or "...and poses significant health threats..." — Preceding unsigned comment added by YSWEISS (talk • contribs) 15:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"...The development and deployment of these nuclear reactors continue on a global base as they are powerful sources of CO2-free energy." Should be "The development and deployment of these nuclear reactors continue on a global base as they are powerful sources energy." The fuel cycle of nuclear plants is not CO2-free. Mining, enrichment, and disposal are high CO2 pollutants. Only the operating part of the cycle is free of CO2 emissions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C0:6701:C850:DF0C:A1ED:F89C:E4BC (talk) 21:48, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2023

The final sentence in the first paragraph states that uranium can be eaten and is an extremely dense source of calories. This is patently false; uranium is toxic, the energy referred to here is the energy released upon fission and hence not usable by the human body, and the citation used says little if anything to support the statement. Please remove the sentence entirely. 82.0.251.175 (talk) 13:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done by Praseodymium-141; thanks for pointing this out. Complex/Rational 13:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clutter

In the article "Isotopes of uranium", i edited out an astonishing amount of unnecessary verbiage, particularly from the section "Uranium-234". Okay? Solomonfromfinland (talk) 05:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply