Cannabis Ruderalis

Former good articleUncyclopedia was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 24, 2006Articles for deletionKept
July 23, 2006Articles for deletionKept
January 19, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
January 21, 2007Articles for deletionKept
January 22, 2007Articles for deletionKept
March 22, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
March 26, 2007Articles for deletionKept
April 7, 2007Articles for deletionKept
November 27, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
November 27, 2007Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
November 29, 2007Good article nomineeListed
March 30, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 18, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Removing Fandom Inc. template?

I am currently questioning whether removing the Fandom Inc template located at the bottom of Uncyclopedia would be a good idea or no. This is because Uncyclopedia has not been affiliated with the aforementioned corporation for almost two years by this point, and therefore, doesn't really have a place there; however, it has been formerly affiliated for, depending on your take on Uncyclopedia's history, between 2006 and either 2013 or 2019.

As such... would removing the Fandom Inc template at the bottom of the page be something you would support or oppose? I'm just trying to gather consensus here. KevTYD (wake up) 15:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would check as regards precedent with other examples outside the world of Uncyclopedia. In other words, I don't know. Perhaps a Wikipedia admin would assist here? --Gepid (talk) 10:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Green tickY Support removing the template, as per the above. KevTYD (wake up) 15:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Green tickY Wikia was a host for a while; one fork left it in disgust, it dropped the other website later. The situation is comparable to having an article include a template for a television network on which a subject program no longer appears. Spike-from-NH (talk) 02:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Green tickY Climbing off the fence. Remove Fandom template. --Gepid (talk) 14:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Psyklopedin" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Psyklopedin. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 21#Psyklopedin until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't get the connection to Uncyclopedia. --Gepid (talk) 15:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked at it and joined the discussion, which should clarify it for you. (Have taken the liberty of revising the link above, as the discussion period was extended. Spike-from-NH (talk) 01:32, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply