Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Turgidson (talk | contribs)
tags
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
Line 7: Line 7:
==Sourcing tags==
==Sourcing tags==
User Anonimu: Please refrain from adding all those (dozen or more) sourcing tags to an article you have not contributed anything except these annoying, disruptive, multiple tags that do not add an iota to the substance of the article, and only distract from the subject matter. As I explained in my edit comment, most of these sources are standard in articles about [[Romanian Land Forces]] Generals, with some of them used in dozens or articles (for at least a decade). Having all these challenges all of a sudden to this article that I brought pretty much single-handedly from stub level to C-level is unwarranted, not even-handed, and an overkill, in my opinion. If you have a specific question about a source, please discuss on this talk page, instead of reverting my edit, with a rather abusive comment, such as "sourcing vandalism". [[User:Turgidson|Turgidson]] ([[User talk:Turgidson|talk]]) 00:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
User Anonimu: Please refrain from adding all those (dozen or more) sourcing tags to an article you have not contributed anything except these annoying, disruptive, multiple tags that do not add an iota to the substance of the article, and only distract from the subject matter. As I explained in my edit comment, most of these sources are standard in articles about [[Romanian Land Forces]] Generals, with some of them used in dozens or articles (for at least a decade). Having all these challenges all of a sudden to this article that I brought pretty much single-handedly from stub level to C-level is unwarranted, not even-handed, and an overkill, in my opinion. If you have a specific question about a source, please discuss on this talk page, instead of reverting my edit, with a rather abusive comment, such as "sourcing vandalism". [[User:Turgidson|Turgidson]] ([[User talk:Turgidson|talk]]) 00:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
:Please see [[WP:RS]]. Using unreliable sources degrades WP quality, the fact such sources were introduced in the past in low-traffic articles is not an excuse to continue propagating them. Thanks.[[User:Anonimu|Anonimu]] ([[User talk:Anonimu|talk]]) 01:19, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:19, 11 January 2021

Sourcing tags

User Anonimu: Please refrain from adding all those (dozen or more) sourcing tags to an article you have not contributed anything except these annoying, disruptive, multiple tags that do not add an iota to the substance of the article, and only distract from the subject matter. As I explained in my edit comment, most of these sources are standard in articles about Romanian Land Forces Generals, with some of them used in dozens or articles (for at least a decade). Having all these challenges all of a sudden to this article that I brought pretty much single-handedly from stub level to C-level is unwarranted, not even-handed, and an overkill, in my opinion. If you have a specific question about a source, please discuss on this talk page, instead of reverting my edit, with a rather abusive comment, such as "sourcing vandalism". Turgidson (talk) 00:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:RS. Using unreliable sources degrades WP quality, the fact such sources were introduced in the past in low-traffic articles is not an excuse to continue propagating them. Thanks.Anonimu (talk) 01:19, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply