Content deleted Content added
Assessment (Mid): Virginia, Television (Rater) |
Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) Tag: |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DYK talk|26 June|2023|entry=... that '''[[PBS Appalachia Virginia]]''' is the first all-digital public TV station in the United States?|nompage=Template:Did you know nominations/PBS Appalachia Virginia}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Television |importance=Low |television-stations=yes |television-stations-importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Did you know nomination== |
==Did you know nomination== |
||
{{Template:Did you know nominations/PBS Appalachia Virginia}} |
{{Template:Did you know nominations/PBS Appalachia Virginia}} |
||
== One reference is just a press release! == |
|||
We can't cite press releases! [[User:Secretlondon|Secretlondon]] ([[User talk:Secretlondon|talk]]) 08:26, 26 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:Who says? --[[User:Washuotaku|WashuOtaku]] ([[User talk:Washuotaku|talk]]) 16:28, 26 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::[[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]] [[User:Secretlondon|Secretlondon]] ([[User talk:Secretlondon|talk]]) 17:46, 1 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::After reading reliable sources link, it without question that using a press release, in regards of this article specifically, was valid. It only questioned the use of it for health- and science-related breaking news, which is not the case here. Thank you for the refresher. --[[User:Washuotaku|WashuOtaku]] ([[User talk:Washuotaku|talk]]) 18:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 09:57, 27 January 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 01:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- ... that PBS Appalachia Virginia is the first all-digital public TV station in the United States? Source: https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/638510859/pbs-appalachia-virginia-launches-first-all-digital-public-tv-station-in-partnership-with-hard-rock-bristol https://cardinalnews.org/2023/06/08/new-bristol-casino-will-house-pbs-appalachia-virginia-nations-first-all-digital-public-tv-station/ https://current.org/2022/09/an-all-digital-public-tv-station-for-southwest-virginia-slated-to-launch-next-year/
- ALT1: ... that PBS Appalachia Virginia is intended as a separate public television station despite having no over-the-air transmitters? Source: https://current.org/2022/09/an-all-digital-public-tv-station-for-southwest-virginia-slated-to-launch-next-year/
- Reviewed:
- Comment: This is my first nomination I was told by several people that I should nominate the article.
Created by Bobherry (talk). Self-nominated at 21:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/PBS Appalachia Virginia; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Adding an ALT1. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 21:12, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
One reference is just a press release![edit]
We can't cite press releases! Secretlondon (talk) 08:26, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Who says? --WashuOtaku (talk) 16:28, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources Secretlondon (talk) 17:46, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- After reading reliable sources link, it without question that using a press release, in regards of this article specifically, was valid. It only questioned the use of it for health- and science-related breaking news, which is not the case here. Thank you for the refresher. --WashuOtaku (talk) 18:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources Secretlondon (talk) 17:46, 1 July 2023 (UTC)