Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Panda619 (talk | contribs)
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
Panda619 (talk | contribs)
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
Line 83: Line 83:


In the Highest Grossing Telugu movies, Magadheera was removed just because IBTimes referred Andhraboxoffice in its content. Is it correct to remove the movie itself if the standard source refers to another source? There are numerous sources available substantiating the gross collections of Magadheera. But user [[User:Panda619|Panda619]] is interested towards deleting the movie just because of his Tamil bias and Telugu hatred. Lot of editors having Tamil ethnicity are trying to demean the recent success of Telugu movies. Why Wikipedia is tolerating such bias editing and giving Barnstar tags to such editors? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/106.222.237.50|106.222.237.50]] ([[User talk:106.222.237.50#top|talk]]) 12:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
In the Highest Grossing Telugu movies, Magadheera was removed just because IBTimes referred Andhraboxoffice in its content. Is it correct to remove the movie itself if the standard source refers to another source? There are numerous sources available substantiating the gross collections of Magadheera. But user [[User:Panda619|Panda619]] is interested towards deleting the movie just because of his Tamil bias and Telugu hatred. Lot of editors having Tamil ethnicity are trying to demean the recent success of Telugu movies. Why Wikipedia is tolerating such bias editing and giving Barnstar tags to such editors? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/106.222.237.50|106.222.237.50]] ([[User talk:106.222.237.50#top|talk]]) 12:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Stop the baseless accusation and read [[WP:FRUIT]] [[User:Panda619|Panda619]] ([[User talk:Panda619|talk]]) 12:31, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
:Stop the baseless accusation and read [[WP:FRUIT]] -- [[User:Panda619|Panda619]] ([[User talk:Panda619|talk]]) 12:31, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:32, 2 September 2019

Box-office updates of malayalam movies

Here in the list of highest grossing malayalam films, movie Madhura Raja is missing from the list. The movie has collected 100 crores gross. Please update the list. Sources which proves that the movie has done 100crores is given below for the references. Thanks. [1] [2] [3] [4] Ambeinghari (talk) 01:34, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All WP:PRIMARY sources. Promotional figures claimed by producer himself are not added into Wikipedia. Continental Rift (talk) 13:31, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I could see all box office figures in this list are released by producers themselves. In that case how can we have other movies figures in this list ? Please check. Tousifmt (talk) 06:58, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Admin brother, can you please say any malayalam movie boxoffice collection that reported by online news portals... Malayalam movies collection are always announce by producer himself. You can check it bro. Anyway i know you dont change anything from this list, but i am just saying it. Anyway Lucifer 175cr 😂 will not believe by fans themselves, 175cr collection 25cr business total 200cr.... Nowadays wikipedia has become fun.... Anyway i am thinking when you will block me from wikipedia Psychotraveller (talk) 18:12, 28 July 2019 (UTC) . Bro One more doudt is indianexpress also fake... For me its a reliable source, but according to you what,[reply]

https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/malayalam/best-of-malayalam-cinema-2019-so-far-5822693/ Psychotraveller (talk) 18:12, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Members in this panel can you please cross check this provided source for MadhuraRaja. Psychotraveller (talk) 07:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What is the problem for Indian express sorce. It purely says that the movie collected 100cr then what is the problem Psychotraveller (talk) 07:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit extended-protected}} template. Melmann 14:31, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Here comes a frustrated Mammootty fanboy called Psychotraveller who makes an odd and misleading claim about Lucifer's 175 crore but has no shame in believing Madhura Raja 100 crore. LOL. You first go cross check the gross of MadhuraRaja with various trade sources from tracked centers. I know this guy is desperate and has no shame, so I am writing this for people who are reading this conversation. Read this paragraph, this Madhura Raja don't even have the collection of Munthirivallikal Thalirkkumbol in tracked centers, that means it's gross is less than 50 crore. As said there, it has not even have grossed 1 crore in Kochi multiplexes (a major center in Kerala, equivalent to Chennai gross for Tamil movies). If this film cant't even be compared with Munthirivallikal Thalirkkumbol, see how ridiculous it is to compare it with the Malayalam top grosser Lucifer. 2405:204:D209:F5CB:BC2F:A8B3:7D27:7C5E (talk) 17:09, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kannada box office update

Add kurukshetra movie box office collection Yogeshsgowda (talk) 10:03, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yogeshsgowda: Are you making a request of other editors' time? If so, bringing quality references might make this process go faster, instead of putting the burden onto others to research the changes you are asking to be made. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Box office update of kannada movies

The villian movie box office update Yogeshsgowda (talk) 10:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yogeshsgowda: See above response. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.instagram.com/p/B1iy5U9HrS1/?igshid=rztqcuae3h34 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yogeshsgowda (talk • contribs) 14:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a suitable reference. We want to see published content from mainstream publications, like major news websites, not a random image you found on an unverified Instagram account. See WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Also, please don't create new discussion sections. Just respond below if you have anything else to add. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 August 2019

For the movies Baahubali: The Beginning and Baahubali 2: The Conclusion, the primary language is Telugu. Not Telugu, Tamil. The movie is made in Telugu and dubbed to other language versions and was released simultaneously.

Like how the primary language for 2.0 movie is Tamil, even though it was released all over Indian in dubbed versions simultaneously.

Except for Baahubali movies, all other movies in the list has only one primary language. Kindly, please change the primary language for both Baahubali movies to Telugu. Ambarish702 (talk) 00:05, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: @Ambarish702: You're four years late to raise this point. This was settled a long time ago. The Baahubali films were simultaneously shot in multiple languages, and we do not place undue focus on the ethnic industry that created the film. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:17, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If a standard source refers to another source, is it correct to remove the standard source

In the Highest Grossing Telugu movies, Magadheera was removed just because IBTimes referred Andhraboxoffice in its content. Is it correct to remove the movie itself if the standard source refers to another source? There are numerous sources available substantiating the gross collections of Magadheera. But user Panda619 is interested towards deleting the movie just because of his Tamil bias and Telugu hatred. Lot of editors having Tamil ethnicity are trying to demean the recent success of Telugu movies. Why Wikipedia is tolerating such bias editing and giving Barnstar tags to such editors? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.222.237.50 (talk) 12:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop the baseless accusation and read WP:FRUIT -- Panda619 (talk) 12:31, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply