This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

India: Cinema List‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Business List‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Film: Indian List‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force. Lists List‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles List This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Hello, I'm Tevar shaa. I wanted to let you know that According to reports at that time, #Mungarumale was the first film to touch ₹50 crore and even within 300 days See this.^[1] And ran for 1 year continuously in PVR with packed houses. And went on to run over 865 days and raked over ₹75 crore in its life time in #Karnataka. ^[2][3]

Actually the the Mungarumale collection is not announced by any primary sources like producer/actor/director/distributors, it is by critic, named C.H. Prahlada Rao, who told to "DNA" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tevar shaa (talk • contribs)

Malayalam movie Ramaleela has entered 59cr pls update that.. Ajayk97 (talk) 10:49, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Please provide a source for that. ToThAc (talk) 16:04, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ramaleela collect more than 56 crore Nabhan nbn (talk) 15:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nabhan nbn: Still lacks a sufficient reference. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:42, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ramaleela 50+crore Nabhan nbn (talk) 02:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ramaleela Malayalam Movie Box Office Collection Report - Indian movie planet indianmovieplanet.com › ramaleela-mala... Ramaleela 50 crore Nabhan nbn (talk) 02:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/ramaleela-earns-rs-55-crore-55-days-arun-gopy-says-he-owes-success-specially-dileep-748819

https://www.filmibeat.com/malayalam/news/2017/ramaleela-box-office-collections-the-dileep-starrer-joins-the-55-crore-club-269390.html

http://www.manoramaonline.com/movies/movie-news/2017/11/08/its-official-dileep-ramaleela-enters-50-crore-club.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramaleela_(film)

^ Above are the links proving it. Ramaleela Malayalam Movie Entered 55 Crore Club.Italic text — Preceding unsigned comment added by PuliMurugan (talk • contribs) 02:52, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@PuliMurugan: The source of the content is the film's director. We don't use primary sources for controversial content, since a director would have every reason to inflate financial figures, and (big surprise) there is a lot of lying in the world of Indian cinema financials. We use sources that provide independent verification. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:58, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But then how will any movies box office collection be known? Most of the movies like Bahubali are known to everyone by the producer or someone else on how much the movie makes at boxoffice. Malayalam Manorama is a trustable news website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PuliMurugan (talk • contribs) 18:08, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Here is the link which gives clear reference that Ramleela has entered 50cr club.This article is given by Times of India which is the most reliable source.The collection they said is not given by the producer or the director . https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/malayalam/movies/news/dileeps-ramaleela-enters-50-crores-club/articleshow/61564289.cms . Please take necessary actionsMuhammed.suhail (talk) 10:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC) Admin can yku please add Ramleela in the list the source is provided above which is by TOI Muhammed.suhail (talk) 08:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Muhammed Suhail... and that link was 1 or 2 weeks ago when the movie collected 50 Crores, Now the movie crossed 55 Crores. http://www.manoramaonline.com/movies/movie-news/2017/11/08/its-official-dileep-ramaleela-enters-50-crore-club.html Manorama Online or Malayalam Manorama is a trustable news channel and website. The movie crossed 55 Crores. Plz Update... Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by PuliMurugan (talk • contribs) 22:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, wait, I'm really confused here. Do both of you live in a mindset where you're unaware of the well-known corruption in Indian film finances? Is that a shocking mystery to you? Because it's certainly not a mystery to me, and I am an outsider who has zero passion for any Indian film. But if you're both aware that Indian film finances are untrustworthy, there's no excuse for asserting that this data, as confirmed by the producers, is the true information. Even Muhammed.suhail's post of this reference says, "Now we hear that the film has also entered the 50 crores club. 'Ramaleela' is Dileep's second movie after 'Two Countries,' reportedly, to enter the 50 crores club." This is a cautious tip-toeing around information that was leaked to them. This isn't an independent confirmation. Do you believe the producers of Kabali who tried to generate hype that the film made ₹600 crore? Are you comfortable swallowing that data? If not, then please stop trying to republish rumours and producer claims as incontrovertible fact. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb Then you tell us how much ramaleela movie collected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PuliMurugan (talk • contribs) 19:46, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It made as much money as independent reliable sources have been able to confirm independently. If that number is not available yet, then we publish nothing. Wikipedia has no deadline. We're not under any obligation to act as shills for the producers by regurgitating their financial claims. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:50, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As you are providing only reliable sources in case of Ezra the source you are provided is not available then how did you add that movie in the List of Malayalam Movies expecting a reliable answer from you sirMuhammed.suhail (talk) 13:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Muhammed.suhail: There is something known as dead url, when a url stops working and dies. This is what happened to the Ezra source. Since most of the users around here must have examined the source and confirmed it's reliability for its inclusion in the article, there is no urgency to remove it. It seems to be a Yahoo News source, from the url. About the gross of Ramaleela, an OR Observation: The actor Dileep was arrested prior to the release of the film, so there is probably a lot of inflation of the figures by the producers as a publicity stunt. This was the latest source I could find which did not use director/producer figures. Also, if the film really has crossed 50 crore, there is bound to be a lot of hype in media, with multiple news reports, not blog reports and reliable sources reporting "reports suggest it crossed 55 crore." King Prithviraj II (talk) 16:34, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I understand what you mean i will provide you the source which proves Ezra , The Great Father , MunthiriVallikal Thalirkkumbol reaches 50cr.You can add this source which is stating that these movies collected 50cr . http://m.manoramaonline.com/movies/movie-news/2017/11/08/its-official-dileep-ramaleela-enters-50-crore-club.html . In the second paragraph it mention about 50cr movies — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muhammed.suhail (talk • contribs) 07:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit I updated the Ezra reference with an archived copy of the Yahoo article. (It actually came from Catch News, filtered through Yahoo.) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:52, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb This is a trustable website. Manorama Online. Please update Ramaleela Final Gross. 55 Crores. http://www.manoramaonline.com/movies/movie-news/2017/11/08/its-official-dileep-ramaleela-enters-50-crore-club.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by PuliMurugan (talk • contribs) 02:12, November 30, 2017 (UTC)

@PuliMurugan: 1) Please sign your talk page posts by typing four tildes like this: ~~~~ This will append your name and a time stamp. This is a requirement. If you post any more unsigned comments, I will just ignore you. 2) I've already explained what the problem is with using content that originates from producers/directors/actors or other primary sources. Either you don't understand for some reason, or you are deliberately ignoring the explanation. Maybe this article can help paint a better picture of the issue. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:01, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• @Cyphoidbomb: I speak Malayalam to an extent, translating the first sentence of the source (ദിലീപ് ചിത്രം രാമലീലയുടെ ബോക്സ്ഓഫീസ് കലക്ഷൻ അണിയറപ്രവർത്തകർ പുറത്തുവിട്ടു) A rough translation would be "Dileep's film Ramaleela's Box Office collection was revealed by the filmakers." This sentence itself shows the figures are primary. King Prithviraj II (talk) 18:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@King Prithviraj II: Thank you for the translation! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, also, check out the headline of this source, the 50 crore claim is met with skepticism. King Prithviraj II (talk) 15:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Financial Express & Indian Express confirmed the Kabali movie grossed 650crores in first 13days from the movie release. Jahir cer (talk) 11:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop raising this nonsensical issue over and over. Your previous comments have been responded to. Now you're just wasting people's time. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As per the reports of TOI Premam has collected 63cr worldwide. Please update this information https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/malayalam/movies/highest-grossing-malayalam-films-of-all-time/photostory/49755072.cms — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muhammed.suhail (talk • contribs) 23:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As per wikipedia the more sources added the more can be believed by the user. For The Great Father only one source is provided. I added new topic mainly because of giving another source validating that the movie has collected 50cr http://m.manoramaonline.com/movies/movie-news/2017/11/08/its-official-dileep-ramaleela-enters-50-crore-club.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muhammed.suhail (talk • contribs) 00:09, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Muhammed.suhail: This reference has been mentioned at least four other times on this page, and you previously mentioned it on 20 November. Read the comments above if you want to understand why the source is problematic. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not talking about Ramleela i am talking about The Great Father In second para it shortly says about the movies that collected 50cr The Great Father is there in the list and it doesnt says that according to produver or actor Muhammed.suhail (talk) 09:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Editors, Please do edit the thupakki release year from 2012 to 2016. Proof - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thuppakki Thank you very much. Nithish Singh (talk) 12:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nithish Singh:  Done I assume you mean that you wanted us to change the release year from 2016 to 2012, right? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The box office gross of 3 Idiots is flawed. As per the given source, it grossed $30.5 overseas. This has been converted at the exchange rate of 2013 rather than that of 2009- which was the year when the film released. If this is converted at the exchange rate of December 2009(the month of release of the film), the overseas gross would be about ₹140-145 crore. I request this to be corrected. Besides, how does the release of a remake of the film in another language make it a franchise? ~Rajan51 (talk) 12:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The $30.5 million figure is the final overseas gross given in early 2017, so it would be better to use a conversion rate nearer to the date of the source. The last territory it released in was Japan in 2013, which is closest to the date of the source. As for the franchise question, while not a series, licensed remakes fit the definition of a franchise, which is a broader concept than a series. Maestro2016 (talk) 05:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that the overseas gross was given in 2017 does not change the year of release in all countries. If the film released in 2013 in Japan, then the collections of Japan alone can be converted at the 2013 rate. This would apply to delayed releases in other countries/territories too. Regarding the 3 idiots franchise, the heading of the table clearly states Highest-grossing franchises and film series which would mean that for an inclusion, it would have to be a film series and a film franchise. ~Rajan51 (talk) 11:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on what exchange rates IB Times were using to convert from local currency to US dollars. For all we know, they could've been using 2017 exchange rates. A 2013 exchange rate makes sense as 2013 is the last time it had an overseas release, and also happens to fall right in the middle between 2009 and 2017. As for the franchise/series, the heading "franchises and film series" means that the list includes both franchises and series, not necessarily that each entry must be both a franchise and series. Maestro2016 (talk) 15:58, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

please remove vivegam from tamil films it is a box office flop and actual collection is 112 crore as of november article http://www.catchnews.com/regional-cinema/vivegam-thala-ajith-starrer-emerges-big-flop-final-collections-lesser-than-opening-weekend-collections-of-thalapathy-vijay-s-mersal-88892.html Thank you --49.206.113.14 (talk) 18:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vivegam's 160 crore gross was attributed to India Today. Do you normally shun this source in favor of Catch.com, or only when it pertains to Vivegam's gross? Because it could be argued that there is a disparity of opinion, and so both sources should be presented in the form of a range. What do you say to that? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spyder is a Telugu Tamil bilingual movie so please do include the '#+' sign which shows it is bilingual. Nithish Singh (talk) 09:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove remakes from the film series. These are not from the same production house. JumboRock (talk) 14:11, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly! When did 3 Idiots became a franchise??? The story didn't go on... It's just that other adaptations in different languages are made... — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarpSinghh (talk • contribs) 05:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained above: "As for the franchise question, while not a series, licensed remakes fit the definition of a franchise, which is a broader concept than a series." They don't need to be from the same production house either. A number of international film franchises have films produced by different companies. Maestro2016 (talk) 09:31, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kollywood Tamil Movie Thuppakki collection is 120 crores Source : http://www.ibtimes.co.in/photos/all-time-highest-grossing-tamil-films-2881-slide-21713#JrEkSJAutV1IH7kS.97 Senthil Babu PM (talk) 21:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please add the film Ramaleela in the list of highest grossing Malayalam films. The film is the second highest grossing Malayalam movie and has grossed approximately 80 crores in the box office. Source for the films collection :https://www.filmibeat.com/malayalam/news/2017/ramaleela-box-office-the-dileep-starrer-is-now-next-only-mohanlal-s-pulimurugan-270556.html. 103.94.138.84 (talk) 14:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Filmibeat is not considered a reliable source for financial information. See WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:48, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Add Ramaleela to the list of highest grossing Malayalam films as the film is the second highest grossing Malayalam film and has grossed 80 crores in the box office as per the information given out by the film's director through his Facebook page. Another source for the collections of Ramaleela : http://www.catchnews.com/regional-cinema/dileep-s-ramaleela-unseats-mohanlal-blockbuster-drishyam-to-become-the-all-time-second-highest-malayalam-grosser-93444.html 103.94.138.84 (talk) 04:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: We don't use primary sources for controversial data like a film's finances. A director/producer/actor would have every reason to inflate these numbers. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:27, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Add information on Tiger Zinda Hai it grossed 256 crores as of now JV Tuber (talk) 07:48, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--- @ JV Tuber you can also add.. anybody can edit wikipedia given sources are reliable

No, this article can only be updated by extended-confirmed users due to protection against vandalism.DarpSinghh (talk) 09:57, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please change the places/rankings of the list for 'India's top 25 highest-grossing films, which include films from all the Indian languages'. It is very messy and most of it are in wrong places/rankings according to the grossing, some of the films are also not similar with the list of 'highest-grossing films by languages' like based on grossing. Please change it to make it look professional and descent, i believe someone vandalize it. Thank you .. 183.78.95.173 (talk) 15:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. I don't see the problem that you're reporting. As of this version of the article, the gross values in the Top 25 list at the top of the article seem to be in descending order. Did you maybe click on the sorting tab in another column, and that threw off the formatting? Maybe I'm missing something. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:45, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please check with tzh how can it be ahead of 300 cr + movies with less bo ^🦂😎 Nabeelgm 😎^🦂(Talk)•°(contribs) Nabeel Gm 09:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC) Nabeel Gm 09:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 09:46, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

please cheak that kabali was 450 cr+ [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Indian_films&diff=817587364&oldid=817582226 here — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.186.144.114 (talk) 12:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The content in the article currently presents a gross of ₹286–499 crore. This range is explained by the note that follows the information. You can read it here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Although just noticed that the Forbes link is attributed to Rob Cain, a contributor, not a staff writer. @Maestro2016: Wasn't there a discussion somewhere about whether or not Rob Cain's opinions were sufficient for inclusion as a reliable source? Was that matter ever resolved? Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 53 external links on List of highest-grossing Indian films. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=145&catName=MTk0MA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=146&catName=MTk1MQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=147&catName=MTk0Mg==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=148&catName=MTk0Mw==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=149&catName=MTk0NA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=150&catName=MTk0NQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=151&catName=MTk0Ng==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=152&catName=MTk0Nw==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Journey-of-Indian-rupee-since-independence/articleshow/21844179.cms
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=154&catName=MTk0OQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=155&catName=MTk1MA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=156&catName=MTk1MQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=158&catName=MTk1Mg==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=159&catName=MTk1Mw==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=160&catName=MTk1NA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=161&catName=MTk1NQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=162&catName=MTk1Ng==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=163&catName=MTk1Nw%3D%3D
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=164&catName=MTk1OA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=165&catName=MTk1OQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=166&catName=MTk2MA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=167&catName=MTk2MQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=168&catName=MTk2Mg==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=169&catName=MTk2Mw==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=170&catName=MTk2NA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=171&catName=MTk2NQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=172&catName=MTk2Ng==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=173&catName=MTk2Nw==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=174&catName=MTk2OA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=175&catName=MTk2OQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=176&catName=MTk3MA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=177&catName=MTk3MQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=178&catName=MTk3Mg==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=179&catName=MTk3Mw%3D%3D%2F1973.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=180&catName=MTk3NA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=182&catName=MTk3Ng==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=183&catName=MTk3Nw==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=184&catName=MTk3OA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=185&catName=MTk3OQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=186&catName=MTk4MA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=187&catName=MTk4MQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=188&catName=MTk4Mg==
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170725023456/https://www.rbth.com/amp/495697 to https://www.rbth.com/amp/495697
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=189&catName=MTk4Mw==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=190&catName=MTk4NA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=191&catName=MTk4NQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=192&catName=MTk4NQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=193&catName=MTk4OA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=194&catName=MTk4OA==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=195&catName=MTk4OQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=201&catName=MTk5NQ==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=202&catName=MTk5Ng==
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=212&catName=MjAwNg==

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please update it to 419.80 crores as of now so rank it up Source:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_Zinda_Hai JV Tuber (talk) 10:51, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]