Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 4 discussion(s) to Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films/Archive 9) (bot
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films/Archive 9) (bot
Line 27: Line 27:
|archive = Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}

== Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2016 ==

{{edit semi-protected|List of highest-grossing Indian films|answered=y}}
[[User:Raminder0707|Raminder0707]] ([[User talk:Raminder0707|talk]]) 10:49, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> as you have not requested a change.<br />If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".<br />Please also cite [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 12:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


== ''[[Mumbai-Pune-Mumbai 2]]'' and Lokmat.com ==
== ''[[Mumbai-Pune-Mumbai 2]]'' and Lokmat.com ==

Revision as of 04:57, 14 December 2016

Mumbai-Pune-Mumbai 2 and Lokmat.com

Mumbai-Pune-Mumbai 2 is indicated in the top Marathi films list as supported by this reference, lokmat.com. Anyone want to address whether or not that should be considered a reliable source? It looks like every other blog on the planet to me. What makes it an authority on the subject of film performance? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments requested - Proposal to cut INRConvert template from this and similar highest-grossing articles

Please participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force#PROPOSAL: The INRConvert template should be cut from various list articles if you have thoughts about whether or not {{INRConvert}} should be removed from highest-grossing Indian film articles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kabali Box office money

http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/rajinikanth-kabali-box-office-collection-rs-650-crore-leaves-salman-khan-sultan-behind/ According to this page Kabali made over 600 crore — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:8040:CA00:133:CF86:F523:33AB (talk) 00:09, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This has been discussed numerous times here, at WP:RSN, at Talk:Kabali (film) and so on. The Indian Express/Financial Express figures were dubious, and both IBT and Firstpost called them fake, noting that the exaggerated totals included satellite rights sales. So far no other reliable sources have addressed numbers that high, and the lack of support speaks volumes. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:55, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply